Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 536 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
26751 The Edge VBC 14-White 1445 17-14 53% 14 IL
26752 SKC 15-Black 1445 2-3 40% 15 KS
26753 HERR VOLLEYBALL CLUB 16 CORDYLINES (NO) 1445 8-13 36% 16
26754 NYC Volley Verse 13-1 1445 13-21 38% 13 NY
26755 Sky High 14-La porta 1445 4-4 50% 14 IL
26756 RISE 712 15-2 1445 8-12 40% 15 IA
26757 CC Rattlers 15-1 1445 15-20 43% 15 TX
26758 AAC 15-Regional 1445 22-20 52% 15 FL
26759 Heat 14-Ignite 1445 11-15 37% 14 NV
26760 NNJ 14-Black 1445 8-10 42% 14 NV
26761 Delano 12-Black 1445 3-6 33% 12 MN
26762 Platteville Fusion Power 15-S 1445 3-6 33% 15 IA
26763 Mighty Mo 12-Arnold 1445 8-11 32% 12 MT
26764 JVC 10-1 1445 5-9 36% 10 IN
26765 FVA 14-Blaze2 - m 1445 11-17 38% 14 AK
26766 Synergy 17-Ashburn 1445 3-2 60% 17 OH
26767 Alliance Nashville 16-1 1445 6-8 43% 16 TN
26768 SERV 18 Select 1445 18-19 49% 18 VA
26769 CPU CVB Storm 13-Black 1445 0-2 0% 13 IA
26770 NEVA 12-Graycin 1445 4-2 57% 12 UT
26771 NNVC 15 1445 15-14 48% 15 NV
26772 Sweet Digs 15 1445 7-5 58% 15 TX
26773 CGVOS 14 Lemieux 1445 13-7 65% 14 AZ
26774 OMNI 11 Elite 1445 12-11 52% 11 CA
26775 Idaho Force 15 1445 5-11 31% 15 ID
26776 RTV 10-Rockets 1445 8-11 36% 10 IL
26777 Nestor Starlings 18-Tee 1445 10-8 56% 18 CA
26778 MN North 16-2 black 1445 25-25 50% 16 MN
26779 Allegiant 15-Blue 1445 28-26 49% 15 TX
26780 TMB 16-S 1445 1-2 25% 16 MN
26781 FCE 16-1 1445 4-10 29% 16 FL
26782 PC Elite 14-2 1445 15-19 39% 14 TX
26783 CC Storm 14 Bailey 1445 13-12 52% 14 TX
26784 MoCo MAVS 11-Cp 1445 1-2 33% 11 TX
26785 HP South 13 Diamond 1445 21-26 45% 13 MO
26786 SVC 11 1445 1-2 33% 11 FL
26787 HRVC 16-National black 1445 19-25 43% 16 NC
26788 DrivenDragons 15 Sapphire 1445 14-14 48% 15 PA
26789 BVC GU 16 1445 4-5 44% 16 NJ
26790 Main Beach 15-Power 1445 11-19 37% 15 CA
26791 Blast Volleyball Club 14 14U Blast Black 1445 5-8 33% 14 PA
26792 Warren Sixpack 15-Black 1445 25-20 56% 15 NJ
26793 Synergy 13-Tsunami 1445 6-13 30% 13 PA
26794 Idaho ONE 14-Mccall 1445 11-12 48% 14 ID
26795 Benson 18 1445 0-2 0% 18 MN
26796 Midwest Juniors 14-2 1445 2-3 40% 14 KS
26797 Prime X Volleyball 14-1 1445 15-19 44% 14 TX
26798 Elevate 16-White 1445 14-10 58% 16 IL
26799 NGT 14U 1445 6-6 50% 14 GA
26800 Prime 10-Adidas 1445 10-17 37% 10 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.