2025-2026 Season — Page 536 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26751 | The Edge VBC 14-White | 1445 | 17-14 | 53% | 14 | IL |
| 26752 | SKC 15-Black | 1445 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | KS |
| 26753 | HERR VOLLEYBALL CLUB 16 CORDYLINES (NO) | 1445 | 8-13 | 36% | 16 | |
| 26754 | NYC Volley Verse 13-1 | 1445 | 13-21 | 38% | 13 | NY |
| 26755 | Sky High 14-La porta | 1445 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | IL |
| 26756 | RISE 712 15-2 | 1445 | 8-12 | 40% | 15 | IA |
| 26757 | CC Rattlers 15-1 | 1445 | 15-20 | 43% | 15 | TX |
| 26758 | AAC 15-Regional | 1445 | 22-20 | 52% | 15 | FL |
| 26759 | Heat 14-Ignite | 1445 | 11-15 | 37% | 14 | NV |
| 26760 | NNJ 14-Black | 1445 | 8-10 | 42% | 14 | NV |
| 26761 | Delano 12-Black | 1445 | 3-6 | 33% | 12 | MN |
| 26762 | Platteville Fusion Power 15-S | 1445 | 3-6 | 33% | 15 | IA |
| 26763 | Mighty Mo 12-Arnold | 1445 | 8-11 | 32% | 12 | MT |
| 26764 | JVC 10-1 | 1445 | 5-9 | 36% | 10 | IN |
| 26765 | FVA 14-Blaze2 - m | 1445 | 11-17 | 38% | 14 | AK |
| 26766 | Synergy 17-Ashburn | 1445 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | OH |
| 26767 | Alliance Nashville 16-1 | 1445 | 6-8 | 43% | 16 | TN |
| 26768 | SERV 18 Select | 1445 | 18-19 | 49% | 18 | VA |
| 26769 | CPU CVB Storm 13-Black | 1445 | 0-2 | 0% | 13 | IA |
| 26770 | NEVA 12-Graycin | 1445 | 4-2 | 57% | 12 | UT |
| 26771 | NNVC 15 | 1445 | 15-14 | 48% | 15 | NV |
| 26772 | Sweet Digs 15 | 1445 | 7-5 | 58% | 15 | TX |
| 26773 | CGVOS 14 Lemieux | 1445 | 13-7 | 65% | 14 | AZ |
| 26774 | OMNI 11 Elite | 1445 | 12-11 | 52% | 11 | CA |
| 26775 | Idaho Force 15 | 1445 | 5-11 | 31% | 15 | ID |
| 26776 | RTV 10-Rockets | 1445 | 8-11 | 36% | 10 | IL |
| 26777 | Nestor Starlings 18-Tee | 1445 | 10-8 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 26778 | MN North 16-2 black | 1445 | 25-25 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 26779 | Allegiant 15-Blue | 1445 | 28-26 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 26780 | TMB 16-S | 1445 | 1-2 | 25% | 16 | MN |
| 26781 | FCE 16-1 | 1445 | 4-10 | 29% | 16 | FL |
| 26782 | PC Elite 14-2 | 1445 | 15-19 | 39% | 14 | TX |
| 26783 | CC Storm 14 Bailey | 1445 | 13-12 | 52% | 14 | TX |
| 26784 | MoCo MAVS 11-Cp | 1445 | 1-2 | 33% | 11 | TX |
| 26785 | HP South 13 Diamond | 1445 | 21-26 | 45% | 13 | MO |
| 26786 | SVC 11 | 1445 | 1-2 | 33% | 11 | FL |
| 26787 | HRVC 16-National black | 1445 | 19-25 | 43% | 16 | NC |
| 26788 | DrivenDragons 15 Sapphire | 1445 | 14-14 | 48% | 15 | PA |
| 26789 | BVC GU 16 | 1445 | 4-5 | 44% | 16 | NJ |
| 26790 | Main Beach 15-Power | 1445 | 11-19 | 37% | 15 | CA |
| 26791 | Blast Volleyball Club 14 14U Blast Black | 1445 | 5-8 | 33% | 14 | PA |
| 26792 | Warren Sixpack 15-Black | 1445 | 25-20 | 56% | 15 | NJ |
| 26793 | Synergy 13-Tsunami | 1445 | 6-13 | 30% | 13 | PA |
| 26794 | Idaho ONE 14-Mccall | 1445 | 11-12 | 48% | 14 | ID |
| 26795 | Benson 18 | 1445 | 0-2 | 0% | 18 | MN |
| 26796 | Midwest Juniors 14-2 | 1445 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | KS |
| 26797 | Prime X Volleyball 14-1 | 1445 | 15-19 | 44% | 14 | TX |
| 26798 | Elevate 16-White | 1445 | 14-10 | 58% | 16 | IL |
| 26799 | NGT 14U | 1445 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | GA |
| 26800 | Prime 10-Adidas | 1445 | 10-17 | 37% | 10 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.