Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 534 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
26651 VORTEX VBC 16-1 national sam 1446 6-10 38% 16 UT
26652 iRoySport 15-Blue 1446 20-16 48% 15 PA
26653 G1 13-1 1446 6-4 60% 13 AR
26654 Central Lakes 16-2 1446 4-2 67% 16 MN
26655 Alpha 12-1 1446 27-32 46% 12 KY
26656 Golden State 11-Black 1446 24-20 55% 11 CA
26657 AVA 15-Avalanche 1446 15-16 44% 15 MA
26658 AZ EVJ 17 Navy 1446 15-22 41% 17 AZ
26659 Eclipse 15-1 (CH) 1446 16-31 31% 15 CA
26660 OYA 15-Hm 1446 19-14 58% 15 CA
26661 FPVC 15-Jason 1446 14-14 50% 15 CA
26662 Prime Performance 17 1446 17-28 38% 17 AZ
26663 A5 South 12-Sam 1446 19-22 46% 12 GA
26664 TAV Houston 16-White 1446 22-36 38% 16 TX
26665 Huskies 14-1 1446 3-4 33% 14 ND
26666 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 11-1 1446 2-2 50% 11 MO
26667 FL Conquer 13 State 1446 16-18 47% 13 FL
26668 AVA 13-Royal 1446 25-25 50% 13 FL
26669 KKVC 17-Ne 1446 2-3 40% 17 SD
26670 Lonestar Thunder 12-Black 1446 18-15 53% 12 TX
26671 VIPER 14 HP 1446 18-23 43% 14 TN
26672 DIG 12-A mackenzie 1446 1-2 25% 12 TX
26673 Hastings Heat 14-1s 1446 6-8 43% 14 MN
26674 Medford 14-Maroon 1446 6-7 46% 14 MN
26675 MVP 12-Regional black 1446 7-9 35% 12 TX
26676 207VBC 16-1 1446 27-21 53% 16 ME
26677 SOMD 12-Black 1446 12-13 38% 12 MD
26678 chaos 12-U orange 1446 3-9 23% 12 ND
26679 FURY 15-Lenny 1446 1-4 20% 15 NJ
26680 PV 10-Navy 1446 2-3 40% 10 IA
26681 Tsunami 16-1n jayla 1446 8-12 40% 16 GA
26682 NIVA South 14-Flamingos 1446 1-3 25% 14 IN
26683 Ark VB 16 1446 18-16 53% 16 IN
26684 Diggersz 13-Spring-demi 1446 6-8 40% 13 IL
26685 Chicago Elite 13-Mango 1446 10-6 63% 13 IL
26686 The Bananas - 17 1446 8-6 57% 17 WY
26687 The Edge 13-Elite 1446 20-29 41% 13 IL
26688 FPVC 13-Ren 2 1446 15-15 50% 13 CA
26689 FUNdamentals Mytics 16 1446 2-2 50% 16 CO
26690 Balance 15 Silver 1446 33-34 49% 15 IL
26691 The Academy Volleyball Club 10-1 adams 1446 1-3 25% 10 IN
26692 Alabama Perf 15-N blue 1446 27-33 45% 15 AL
26693 CC Wave 15-1 1446 12-8 60% 15 TX
26694 RVC 15 Zonal 1446 30-38 44% 15 VA
26695 Texas Serve 15-S gold 1446 19-26 42% 15 TX
26696 Premier 17-1 blue 1446 13-22 35% 17 AL
26697 Pgh Elite 17-Premier 1446 21-38 36% 17 PA
26698 A5 West 13-Aerion 1446 14-26 35% 13 GA
26699 H2 13-Longhorns_kayla 1446 18-30 38% 13 MO
26700 SVC 12 Titanium 1446 9-10 47% 12 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.