Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 532 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
26551 ND Elite 16-Peterson 1447 12-16 43% 16 ND
26552 Coast Crew 14-1 red 1447 10-9 53% 14 OR
26553 Midwest Elite VBC 13 1447 12-10 52% 13 MO
26554 BOOST 16-1 navy 1447 6-9 40% 16 IA
26555 KIVA 11-White 1447 37-39 49% 11 KY
26556 Hunter's 12-Gray 1447 7-9 44% 12 FL
26557 DuPage Elite 15 United 1447 24-34 41% 15 IL
26558 Impact 13-Emma 1447 11-8 58% 13 MI
26559 NWVBC 17-1 1447 2-3 40% 17 WI
26560 575 16-Wsr zoe 1447 23-21 52% 16 GA
26561 OK Maverick 14 1447 13-16 45% 14 OK
26562 SA force 13 Select 1447 21-26 44% 13 TX
26563 SG Elite 14-Bolt 1447 11-7 61% 14 CA
26564 Viroqua Venom 17 1447 2-4 33% 17 WI
26565 TC ELITE 13-R 1447 2-4 20% 13 LA
26566 AVCN 16-1 red 1447 29-32 45% 16 VA
26567 SA MAGIC 14 SILVER 1447 17-15 53% 14 TX
26568 BBVCL 15 Gilbert 1447 24-32 43% 15 NV
26569 VIRAGO 18-Elite 1447 24-20 55% 18 OK
26570 MEVC 16 National 1447 42-36 52% 16 MD
26571 DG Warriors 13-Gray 1447 9-10 47% 13 OH
26572 SVBC 18-Teal 1447 5-5 50% 18 IA
26573 BVA 16-National 1447 19-21 44% 16 MD
26574 DSC ELITE 16 17 U 2025/2026 1447 3-3 50% 16 WI
26575 Sky High Adidas 13-Red 1447 15-18 45% 13 IL
26576 Hanover VC 17-1 1447 19-15 56% 17 PA
26577 Legacy Elite VBA 13-N 1447 18-18 50% 13 OH
26578 Shock 13-Ua storm 1447 18-21 46% 13 IL
26579 Club Fusion 13-Fire spring 1447 4-6 33% 13 IL
26580 purple storm 16-1 1447 5-4 56% 16 AL
26581 COLAVOL 13 Carolina 1447 12-10 52% 13 GA
26582 310VBC 16-Aaron 1447 3-4 43% 16 CA
26583 SVA 16-1 1447 8-11 42% 16 CA
26584 InnovativeVC 14-2 robert 1447 8-8 50% 14 PR
26585 Apex 12-Green 1447 4-6 40% 12 IL
26586 CWVC 13-Red 1447 2-3 40% 13 WI
26587 Ut Bounce 15-Blue 1447 14-18 40% 15 UT
26588 TCVA 15 Coach Phil 1447 1-2 20% 15
26589 Dome Defenders 15-Navy 1447 3-6 33% 15
26590 Havoc 16-Purple 1447 28-37 42% 16 MN
26591 Momentum 13-2 1447 2-3 40% 13 IN
26592 NE D-League 14-Red 1447 4-6 40% 14 IA
26593 High Voltage 14-3 1447 2-3 40% 14 MN
26594 Webo 12-2s stasia 1447 4-7 36% 12 IN
26595 NOVA Juniors 15-S maroon 1447 8-15 35% 15 OH
26596 Hutchinson 12-2 1447 1-2 33% 12 MN
26597 VVA 13-Petersen 1447 2-3 40% 13 CA
26598 Fortress Volleyball Medeiros 15 1446 3-5 38% 15
26599 Leaside 15-2 flash 1446 3-4 43% 15 ON
26600 NHE 10-Hailey 1446 0-2 0% 10 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.