2025-2026 Season — Page 531 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26501 | Katy Volleyball 14-White | 1447 | 9-14 | 39% | 14 | TX |
| 26502 | ReNew Volleyball Club 12 ReNew VBC (XL) | 1447 | 11-8 | 48% | 12 | |
| 26503 | EliteZ 14-Girls hp black | 1447 | 18-19 | 49% | 14 | NH |
| 26504 | Black Swamp 16-4 | 1447 | 5-9 | 36% | 16 | OH |
| 26505 | TPV 14-Tango | 1447 | 33-34 | 49% | 14 | TN |
| 26506 | M1 18-Silver | 1447 | 21-14 | 60% | 18 | TN |
| 26507 | ClubCENTRAL 12-Black | 1447 | 4-4 | 50% | 12 | SD |
| 26508 | MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 17 MOCO (MD) Matrix | 1447 | 8-15 | 35% | 17 | MD |
| 26509 | Kokoro Volleyball 17-3 | 1447 | 30-30 | 50% | 17 | MN |
| 26510 | Xtreme 17-1 | 1447 | 4-5 | 44% | 17 | CO |
| 26511 | Crossfire 14-Jade | 1447 | 3-7 | 30% | 14 | MN |
| 26512 | Freeze ND 15 Ice | 1447 | 17-27 | 37% | 15 | ND |
| 26513 | White Hawks 11-2 | 1447 | 4-4 | 50% | 11 | MN |
| 26514 | Kingdom KC 12-1 | 1447 | 3-4 | 43% | 12 | MO |
| 26515 | SYA 14 Thunder | 1447 | 15-14 | 52% | 14 | VA |
| 26516 | Rockwood 10-Red | 1447 | 1-3 | 25% | 10 | MO |
| 26517 | LHVA 17-Elite | 1447 | 18-15 | 55% | 17 | NY |
| 26518 | Kansas Krush 18-1 | 1447 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | KS |
| 26519 | Aspire NW 15-3 power | 1447 | 15-24 | 38% | 15 | OR |
| 26520 | C2 14-3 reg orange gary | 1447 | 2-6 | 25% | 14 | TN |
| 26521 | OK Charge 16-West | 1447 | 14-17 | 44% | 16 | OK |
| 26522 | ITVC 13 Baden | 1447 | 19-25 | 43% | 13 | WA |
| 26523 | LEGACY 13-Premier amanda | 1447 | 16-13 | 55% | 13 | FL |
| 26524 | MPV 13-Elite green | 1447 | 9-18 | 29% | 13 | UT |
| 26525 | Southern Pines Volleyball Club 14 SPVC Spruce Pine | 1447 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | GA |
| 26526 | EVC 14-Blue 50 | 1447 | 1-6 | 14% | 14 | GA |
| 26527 | Next Gen 15-Maroon | 1447 | 26-20 | 55% | 15 | MO |
| 26528 | Ignition 16 U15 | 1447 | 5-4 | 56% | 16 | WA |
| 26529 | OVVC 15-North | 1447 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | OH |
| 26530 | GVJ 14-Sage | 1447 | 14-7 | 67% | 14 | AZ |
| 26531 | Aspire 13-Teal | 1447 | 3-4 | 43% | 13 | AZ |
| 26532 | BEVC 17-Blue | 1447 | 14-17 | 45% | 17 | SC |
| 26533 | AVA 13-Blue | 1447 | 29-38 | 43% | 13 | AZ |
| 26534 | WCA 14-Teal | 1447 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | NC |
| 26535 | Sonics VC 14-Blue | 1447 | 3-6 | 33% | 14 | MI |
| 26536 | LI Fury 16-Lauren | 1447 | 9-8 | 53% | 16 | NY |
| 26537 | NLVC 16-Elite | 1447 | 21-30 | 41% | 16 | TX |
| 26538 | Prime Time 12-Chipmunks | 1447 | 7-12 | 37% | 12 | IL |
| 26539 | STL Crossfire 13 T1 | 1447 | 15-23 | 38% | 13 | MO |
| 26540 | NWAS VBC 18-1 | 1447 | 5-5 | 50% | 18 | WA |
| 26541 | Metro Performance 16-Purple | 1447 | 12-27 | 31% | 16 | |
| 26542 | SPARKS VBC 14-Red | 1447 | 23-26 | 47% | 14 | PA |
| 26543 | Atlas Volleyball club 14 Atlas Rise (CH) | 1447 | 12-9 | 57% | 14 | PA |
| 26544 | 319 United 10 | 1447 | 1-2 | 33% | 10 | IA |
| 26545 | Academy Volleyball Club 18 | 1447 | 23-24 | 45% | 18 | DE |
| 26546 | Valley East 18-Prueter | 1447 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | MI |
| 26547 | CCVC 16 | 1447 | 7-10 | 41% | 16 | WY |
| 26548 | OT 11-T holly | 1447 | 22-21 | 51% | 11 | FL |
| 26549 | LHVA 15-Purple | 1447 | 6-4 | 60% | 15 | NY |
| 26550 | RVA WEST 11-Navy | 1447 | 17-19 | 47% | 11 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.