Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 531 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
26501 Katy Volleyball 14-White 1447 9-14 39% 14 TX
26502 ReNew Volleyball Club 12 ReNew VBC (XL) 1447 11-8 48% 12
26503 EliteZ 14-Girls hp black 1447 18-19 49% 14 NH
26504 Black Swamp 16-4 1447 5-9 36% 16 OH
26505 TPV 14-Tango 1447 33-34 49% 14 TN
26506 M1 18-Silver 1447 21-14 60% 18 TN
26507 ClubCENTRAL 12-Black 1447 4-4 50% 12 SD
26508 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 17 MOCO (MD) Matrix 1447 8-15 35% 17 MD
26509 Kokoro Volleyball 17-3 1447 30-30 50% 17 MN
26510 Xtreme 17-1 1447 4-5 44% 17 CO
26511 Crossfire 14-Jade 1447 3-7 30% 14 MN
26512 Freeze ND 15 Ice 1447 17-27 37% 15 ND
26513 White Hawks 11-2 1447 4-4 50% 11 MN
26514 Kingdom KC 12-1 1447 3-4 43% 12 MO
26515 SYA 14 Thunder 1447 15-14 52% 14 VA
26516 Rockwood 10-Red 1447 1-3 25% 10 MO
26517 LHVA 17-Elite 1447 18-15 55% 17 NY
26518 Kansas Krush 18-1 1447 2-2 50% 18 KS
26519 Aspire NW 15-3 power 1447 15-24 38% 15 OR
26520 C2 14-3 reg orange gary 1447 2-6 25% 14 TN
26521 OK Charge 16-West 1447 14-17 44% 16 OK
26522 ITVC 13 Baden 1447 19-25 43% 13 WA
26523 LEGACY 13-Premier amanda 1447 16-13 55% 13 FL
26524 MPV 13-Elite green 1447 9-18 29% 13 UT
26525 Southern Pines Volleyball Club 14 SPVC Spruce Pine 1447 2-4 33% 14 GA
26526 EVC 14-Blue 50 1447 1-6 14% 14 GA
26527 Next Gen 15-Maroon 1447 26-20 55% 15 MO
26528 Ignition 16 U15 1447 5-4 56% 16 WA
26529 OVVC 15-North 1447 2-2 50% 15 OH
26530 GVJ 14-Sage 1447 14-7 67% 14 AZ
26531 Aspire 13-Teal 1447 3-4 43% 13 AZ
26532 BEVC 17-Blue 1447 14-17 45% 17 SC
26533 AVA 13-Blue 1447 29-38 43% 13 AZ
26534 WCA 14-Teal 1447 2-3 40% 14 NC
26535 Sonics VC 14-Blue 1447 3-6 33% 14 MI
26536 LI Fury 16-Lauren 1447 9-8 53% 16 NY
26537 NLVC 16-Elite 1447 21-30 41% 16 TX
26538 Prime Time 12-Chipmunks 1447 7-12 37% 12 IL
26539 STL Crossfire 13 T1 1447 15-23 38% 13 MO
26540 NWAS VBC 18-1 1447 5-5 50% 18 WA
26541 Metro Performance 16-Purple 1447 12-27 31% 16
26542 SPARKS VBC 14-Red 1447 23-26 47% 14 PA
26543 Atlas Volleyball club 14 Atlas Rise (CH) 1447 12-9 57% 14 PA
26544 319 United 10 1447 1-2 33% 10 IA
26545 Academy Volleyball Club 18 1447 23-24 45% 18 DE
26546 Valley East 18-Prueter 1447 1-4 20% 18 MI
26547 CCVC 16 1447 7-10 41% 16 WY
26548 OT 11-T holly 1447 22-21 51% 11 FL
26549 LHVA 15-Purple 1447 6-4 60% 15 NY
26550 RVA WEST 11-Navy 1447 17-19 47% 11 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.