Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 530 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
26451 1W 13 Crimson 1448 15-20 43% 13 WI
26452 EVC 15-Black 1448 7-12 37% 15 WA
26453 Small Town Storm 16-2 1448 2-3 40% 16 WI
26454 SW Spikers 16-Blue 1448 4-4 50% 16 WI
26455 Synergy 17 Hydra 1448 30-32 48% 17 PA
26456 PTV 15 1448 2-3 40% 15 MI
26457 Legacy 15-Select east 1448 26-17 60% 15 MI
26458 Ga Blaze 14-1 1448 19-18 51% 14 GA
26459 Dead Frog 14-Alana 1448 10-6 63% 14 MI
26460 MVC Panthers 10-Pink 1448 1-2 33% 10 IL
26461 Top Caliber 15 Kayla 1448 20-23 47% 15 NC
26462 LPH 15-1 1448 17-17 50% 15 NC
26463 KCV 15-#2 aurora 1448 2-3 40% 15 CA
26464 Mn Royals 15-2 1448 4-9 31% 15 MN
26465 Hollywood 15-2 rise 1448 5-8 38% 15 OH
26466 RVJ 12 Local 1448 9-12 43% 12 VA
26467 FTL 13-Fusion open-usa teddy 1448 0-3 0% 13 FL
26468 IMUA 13-Regional 1448 6-4 60% 13 MI
26469 Princeton 14-1 1448 5-9 36% 14 MN
26470 St. Joe Storm 17-1 1448 3-2 60% 17 MO
26471 Fort Wayne VBC 12-Thunder 1448 8-11 42% 12 IN
26472 RTR JO VB 13 1448 2-6 22% 13 SD
26473 Club 1 SS 13-Red 1448 2-2 50% 13 IL
26474 WVBC 14-Dakari 1448 13-11 54% 14 SC
26475 MAVA 16-Elite 1448 28-34 45% 16 KY
26476 WSRVBC 16-National 1448 3-4 43% 16 NV
26477 Metro Performance 15-Black 1448 3-4 43% 15
26478 Eclipse 17-1 1448 20-21 49% 17 WA
26479 ID Peak 17-Billie 1448 0-7 0% 17 WA
26480 Mizuno CNVBC 15-So/ro 1448 12-15 44% 15 MO
26481 LOTOVC 15 1448 3-3 50% 15 MO
26482 BEAST ATHLETICS 13 MAROON 1448 16-16 50% 13 TX
26483 360 13-National black 1448 11-11 41% 13 TX
26484 NC GOLD VOLLEYBALL 15-3 1448 0-0 0% 15 GA
26485 Vibe 15-Kaleigh 1448 13-14 48% 15 GA
26486 Ignite 17-White 1448 24-30 44% 17 WA
26487 Forward 17-Red 1448 1-2 33% 17 FL
26488 Victorium 16 UA 1448 16-37 30% 16 AZ
26489 Sandhills 17 Brandon 1448 14-14 50% 17 NC
26490 DN 12-Black 1448 3-4 30% 12 TX
26491 TW Skyline 12-Black 1448 10-12 43% 12 TX
26492 Cities 14-Rikki 1448 27-24 53% 14 VA
26493 HP Illinois 14-Tangerine 1448 0-2 0% 14 MO
26494 417 Juniors 14-3 1448 1-2 20% 14 MO
26495 Elite 13 Premier 1448 8-15 35% 13 MO
26496 PowerSetVC 17-1 1448 20-20 49% 17 TX
26497 NLV 16-1 1448 13-13 50% 16 GA
26498 KC Vipers 14-1 black 1447 3-4 43% 14 TX
26499 Air VBC 16-Black 1447 7-7 47% 16 WI
26500 3DGE 16-1 black 1447 11-23 32% 16 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.