Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 529 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
26401 BC Bombers 12 1448 5-7 36% 12 LA
26402 Vegas Volley 13 1448 1-2 33% 13 NV
26403 Queen 11 1448 6-6 50% 11 WI
26404 Mission Volleyball Academy 12 1448 5-5 50% 12 OH
26405 Mintonette Sports 12-2 1448 26-62 30% 12 OH
26406 Montana Club 16-2 1448 20-26 40% 16 MT
26407 MVIce 12-R bri 1448 0-4 0% 12 UT
26408 Rise 17-Yellow 1448 20-21 49% 17 CO
26409 Team Colorado 17-N2 1448 28-24 54% 17 CO
26410 Jammers 10-Black 1448 14-21 40% 10 HI
26411 Jax Skyline 15-Grey 1448 1-2 33% 15 FL
26412 OVBC 10-Purple 1448 10-15 40% 10 WI
26413 Chicago Premier VBC 16 15 Gold (GL) 1448 1-2 33% 16
26414 OVA 15-G legacy 1448 9-44 17% 15 AZ
26415 Indiana South VBC 14U Silver 1448 25-19 57% 14 IN
26416 Team Atlantis 17-Day 1448 1-3 25% 17 OH
26417 Acceleration Volleyball 12 AVB Fire 11/12's 1448 4-2 67% 12 MN
26418 Legacy 18-1 1448 10-11 48% 18 FL
26419 CE LFT - Lite 13-Sophie 1448 5-5 50% 13 LA
26420 ATL Youth Sports 15-Blue 1448 1-2 33% 15 IL
26421 NKJV 17-White 1448 12-19 39% 17 KY
26422 Valley Flames 15-Black 1448 14-11 56% 15 TX
26423 FOCUS 12 12-Mariel 1448 14-12 54% 12
26424 NLVA 12-Collins 1448 7-10 37% 12 MO
26425 Mass Premier 14-2 gold 1448 20-16 56% 14 MA
26426 AV 13-1 diamond 1448 3-5 38% 13 GA
26427 VC United 14 VC United SP141 Regional (GL) 1448 8-13 36% 14 IL
26428 Red Slam 14 1448 11-8 58% 14 IN
26429 MVP 18-Blue 1448 29-42 41% 18 WI
26430 Aus Velocity 11-1 diamond 1448 12-13 48% 11 TX
26431 TX432 11-Gold 1448 14-20 41% 11 TX
26432 Cicero Elite SS 14-Purple 1448 9-7 56% 14 IL
26433 Iowa Vibe 16-Teal 1448 2-3 40% 16 IA
26434 Flatirons 15-Black 1448 24-19 56% 15 CO
26435 SA Juniors 14 Navy 1448 20-18 51% 14 TX
26436 KeAloha 17-2 cp 1448 19-16 54% 17 IN
26437 THNDR 13-1 1448 2-3 40% 13 OH
26438 Pioneer VBC 14-2 1448 5-6 45% 14 OH
26439 Queen City Volleyball Club 14 14U White 1448 2-3 40% 14 OH
26440 Azuri Performance 13-1 1448 9-12 43% 13 WI
26441 LAVA 13-2 a 1448 17-20 46% 13 OH
26442 Vancouver VBC 18-1 1448 24-30 44% 18 OR
26443 Team 27 13-Skielar 1448 10-11 48% 13 MI
26444 MVA 13-Premier 1448 34-34 50% 13 MI
26445 GCVC 13-DAYSHA 1448 6-13 32% 13 IN
26446 Pantera 13-Pardue 1448 14-18 44% 13 IN
26447 Norwalk 15-Purple 1448 3-7 30% 15 IA
26448 Eastside Volleyball Club 15-Storm 1448 22-26 46% 15 IA
26449 DCVB Navy 16-1 1448 5-5 50% 16 NC
26450 CSVC 16-White 1448 7-7 50% 16 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.