2025-2026 Season — Page 528 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26351 | Top Flight 16-Kappa | 1449 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | IL |
| 26352 | Top Flight SC 13 Eagle | 1449 | 15-15 | 50% | 13 | SC |
| 26353 | ESVC 13-Blue | 1449 | 16-17 | 48% | 13 | AL |
| 26354 | Synergy VBC 15-Typhoon | 1449 | 6-8 | 38% | 15 | NY |
| 26355 | RRS of MS 17-1 | 1449 | 4-5 | 44% | 17 | MS |
| 26356 | Alexandria Titans 16-1 | 1449 | 9-12 | 43% | 16 | VA |
| 26357 | MN Select 13-Gray | 1449 | 22-20 | 52% | 13 | MN |
| 26358 | Rapid Fire 17-Blue | 1449 | 10-14 | 42% | 17 | IL |
| 26359 | PVC 16-Blue | 1449 | 10-7 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 26360 | Illini United 18 | 1449 | 9-7 | 56% | 18 | IL |
| 26361 | Starlings S-N-P 16-Coach janille | 1449 | 10-9 | 53% | 16 | CA |
| 26362 | ESVC 12-Blue | 1449 | 16-14 | 53% | 12 | AL |
| 26363 | Ridgeland Reds-Red 16 | 1449 | 18-20 | 47% | 16 | WI |
| 26364 | Gulf Coast 11-Rain | 1449 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | FL |
| 26365 | NIVA 13-Onyx | 1449 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | IN |
| 26366 | CVC 11-Red | 1449 | 6-8 | 43% | 11 | OH |
| 26367 | Aspire 15-2 pink | 1449 | 16-23 | 41% | 15 | AB |
| 26368 | WGVC 12-2 national | 1449 | 15-13 | 54% | 12 | FL |
| 26369 | Soar VBC 14-Jackie | 1449 | 3-3 | 38% | 14 | AL |
| 26370 | AVC CLE 14 Gold | 1449 | 26-31 | 46% | 14 | OH |
| 26371 | WAVE 12-Alexa | 1449 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | CA |
| 26372 | HP 16-Nl onyx | 1449 | 19-15 | 56% | 16 | MI |
| 26373 | Gators VBC 14-Elite white | 1449 | 14-17 | 45% | 14 | OH |
| 26374 | Team Colorado 15-L | 1449 | 1-2 | 33% | 15 | CO |
| 26375 | Titanas 13 | 1449 | 3-4 | 43% | 13 | PR |
| 26376 | Corozal TIV 13-1 angel | 1449 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | PR |
| 26377 | Stingray 13-Select adyson | 1449 | 15-16 | 48% | 13 | CA |
| 26378 | 674 Manati 13-1 f jossy | 1449 | 1-2 | 33% | 13 | PR |
| 26379 | EMV 14-Metro white jess | 1449 | 0-1 | 0% | 14 | TX |
| 26380 | Pioneer VBC 13-1 | 1449 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | OH |
| 26381 | FTL 13-Nuclear esteban | 1449 | 15-15 | 50% | 13 | FL |
| 26382 | NJVBC 13-Thunder | 1449 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | NJ |
| 26383 | DN Red Oak 13-Elite | 1449 | 17-18 | 47% | 13 | |
| 26384 | PVA Select 13-3 | 1449 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | KS |
| 26385 | Southern Alberta Volleyball Club SAVC 15-Storm | 1448 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | |
| 26386 | VVC 15 | 1448 | 1-3 | 25% | 15 | |
| 26387 | Thundercats Volleyball 17 Thundercats Infinity (CA) | 1448 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | |
| 26388 | VL 17-Kali | 1448 | 4-6 | 29% | 17 | |
| 26389 | Novus 15-Purple | 1448 | 11-11 | 50% | 15 | IL |
| 26390 | NSVA 17-1 | 1448 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 26391 | SPRING Mini 407 14-Christin | 1448 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | FL |
| 26392 | Starlings 18-Black | 1448 | 1-2 | 25% | 18 | NE |
| 26393 | Cutthroat 11-1 | 1448 | 9-6 | 45% | 11 | MT |
| 26394 | PVA 18-2 | 1448 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | MO |
| 26395 | Mighty Mo 14-Wood | 1448 | 12-11 | 48% | 14 | MT |
| 26396 | Lancer 11-Scarlett | 1448 | 2-3 | 29% | 11 | IA |
| 26397 | Dragons 18-Phantoms | 1448 | 41-37 | 53% | 18 | MA |
| 26398 | Pleasure Island Storm 16 PIVC Storm Bobby | 1448 | 21-25 | 46% | 16 | AL |
| 26399 | Elevate AK 18-Purple | 1448 | 10-15 | 40% | 18 | AK |
| 26400 | Hermantown 17 | 1448 | 11-11 | 50% | 17 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.