Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 512 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25551 Big Sky 16-4 1456 10-11 32% 16 MT
25552 NVA 15-Elite rafa 1456 29-25 54% 15 FL
25553 ID Crush 10-Chadez 1456 3-4 43% 10 ID
25554 Academy 14-Mi ignite 1456 9-12 43% 14 IN
25555 Storm Volleyball Club 14-Silver 1456 10-11 45% 14 CO
25556 Quicksets 16-Pink 1456 4-6 40% 16 HI
25557 ESD 16-A 1456 5-7 42% 16 AZ
25558 Cap City 12 Navy 1456 3-6 33% 12 NC
25559 Digtown 15-Ice 1456 27-28 48% 15 IL
25560 Blue Royals 14 Topaz 1456 28-32 47% 14 WA
25561 MARIN 12-West 1456 23-24 49% 12 CA
25562 Oly Reign 16-Boys 1456 2-4 33% 16 WA
25563 LAVA West 15-Premier ca 1456 27-28 49% 15 CA
25564 Saints 12 1456 4-5 44% 12 MO
25565 Hot Shots 13 Teal 1456 9-10 38% 13 NY
25566 TVCG 14-1s 1456 9-12 43% 14 IN
25567 UNION 15-Ky white 1456 18-20 47% 15 IN
25568 Wrecking Crew 15-2 1456 2-2 40% 15 TX
25569 AVBC 12-S spades 1456 23-15 61% 12 AZ
25570 Sweets 16-Black 1456 7-14 33% 16 WA
25571 Golden State 14-Teal 1456 5-6 33% 14 CA
25572 Spartan Wave 12 1456 3-3 50% 12 MN
25573 Arabian Juniors 13-Green 1456 8-10 44% 13 IN
25574 FCA Force 17-2 natalie 1456 8-7 53% 17 NC
25575 Aus Velocity 13-3 sapphire 1456 18-17 51% 13 TX
25576 SKY Elite 17 Gold 1456 18-22 45% 17 PA
25577 High Voltage 12-White 1456 2-3 40% 12 MN
25578 Wranglers VBC 16-Lynn 1456 2-3 40% 16 MI
25579 UNION 14-Purple 1456 35-34 51% 14 IN
25580 Coamo Select 11-Black 1456 3-3 50% 11 PR
25581 KKVC 12-Sc - blue 1456 2-3 40% 12 SD
25582 SW Tidal Wave 17-1 1456 11-26 30% 17 FL
25583 KCE Supreme G18-1 1456 3-2 60% 18
25584 NorthShore 11-Tubbs/spettle 1456 2-2 50% 11 OH
25585 NJVBC 15-Storm 1456 4-4 50% 15 PA
25586 TNT 15 Siren 1456 14-17 41% 15 PA
25587 AVC CLE 12-White 1456 17-36 32% 12 OH
25588 Renaissance 16-Red bc 1456 11-10 52% 16 OH
25589 WD Nation 12-White 1456 10-12 42% 12 LA
25590 FVC 15-Vibe 1456 24-26 48% 15 MD
25591 Va Wave 16-Crest atlantic 1455 31-27 53% 16 VA
25592 Capital Region Volleyball Club 16-1 hawks 1455 4-12 25% 16 NH
25593 Top Flight 12-National 1455 4-7 36% 12 NV
25594 360 12-1 1455 1-2 20% 12 NV
25595 603 United 16-Seacoast national 1455 5-4 56% 16 NH
25596 United 15-Bhm black 1455 13-18 42% 15 AL
25597 Lakes Jr's 13-Diamond 1455 16-15 52% 13 WI
25598 Lex United 13 National 1455 57-70 45% 13 KY
25599 SEIVB 15 Issette 1455 8-9 47% 15 IN
25600 NHVB Youth-Purple 12 Orange 1455 2-2 50% 12 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.