2025-2026 Season — Page 513 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25601 | Vista 11-Airey | 1455 | 2-3 | 40% | 11 | CA |
| 25602 | Champion 13-R purple | 1455 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | NC |
| 25603 | Onslow Freedom 16 | 1455 | 7-5 | 58% | 16 | NC |
| 25604 | Palm Beach Jrs 15-1 | 1455 | 11-13 | 46% | 15 | FL |
| 25605 | Mintonette Sports 14-5 | 1455 | 17-21 | 45% | 14 | OH |
| 25606 | THNDR 17-1 | 1455 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | OH |
| 25607 | Greater Cincinnati Volleyball Club 17 17-Berling | 1455 | 19-26 | 42% | 17 | OH |
| 25608 | LAV 13-Local black | 1455 | 12-13 | 48% | 13 | AL |
| 25609 | Netforce 13-Annelyse | 1455 | 14-20 | 39% | 13 | AL |
| 25610 | CMVBC 12-1 | 1455 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | MO |
| 25611 | Southside Swarm VBC 12-1 | 1455 | 4-2 | 36% | 12 | MO |
| 25612 | Metro Volleyball Club 18-Central | 1455 | 17-17 | 46% | 18 | DC |
| 25613 | Malulani M&M 12-S | 1455 | 1-2 | 25% | 12 | HI |
| 25614 | Momentum 18-Blue | 1455 | 18-24 | 43% | 18 | CO |
| 25615 | Architects Volleyball Club 15-Black | 1455 | 14-18 | 38% | 15 | TX |
| 25616 | UVA 14-Club | 1455 | 0-2 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 25617 | Boss CLE Athletic Company 16-2 elite | 1455 | 0-7 | 0% | 16 | OH |
| 25618 | Summit 17-Nat'l blue | 1455 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | TX |
| 25619 | Topeka Fury Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1455 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | KS |
| 25620 | Illini NW 16U Teal | 1455 | 6-7 | 46% | 16 | IL |
| 25621 | Top Flight 16-Psi sp | 1455 | 3-1 | 75% | 16 | IL |
| 25622 | ELITE NEXT LEVEL 17-1 | 1455 | 9-12 | 41% | 17 | TX |
| 25623 | DBQ Mayhem 11-Girls | 1455 | 1-2 | 25% | 11 | IA |
| 25624 | Storm 16 Gold | 1455 | 9-12 | 43% | 16 | |
| 25625 | Net Force 12 Legacy | 1455 | 11-15 | 41% | 12 | IA |
| 25626 | Clark Fork Juniors 12-1 | 1455 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | WA |
| 25627 | JJVA Club 13-G | 1455 | 8-7 | 53% | 13 | FL |
| 25628 | Madison Starlings 17-Blue | 1455 | 11-8 | 58% | 17 | WI |
| 25629 | Stars 16-S blue | 1455 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | MN |
| 25630 | Platinum 12-Ace 2 | 1455 | 1-3 | 25% | 12 | UT |
| 25631 | EASTSIDE ICE VOLLEYBALL CLUB 14 Eastside Ice Chill (WE) | 1455 | 17-19 | 47% | 14 | NY |
| 25632 | CALI 14-White south | 1455 | 20-21 | 49% | 14 | NY |
| 25633 | Maverick 13 Maroon | 1455 | 20-29 | 41% | 13 | OH |
| 25634 | WGVC 14-2 elite purple | 1455 | 33-36 | 48% | 14 | FL |
| 25635 | FH 12-Al'i-ninaaka | 1455 | 0-1 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 25636 | TX LEGACY 15 LIBERTY | 1455 | 23-24 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 25637 | Alabama Hellcats Volleyball Club 16 | 1455 | 10-9 | 53% | 16 | AL |
| 25638 | ARVBC 13-Purple | 1455 | 3-5 | 38% | 13 | GA |
| 25639 | Rise 11-Blue | 1455 | 2-3 | 40% | 11 | NE |
| 25640 | FW FIRE 14-2w | 1455 | 9-11 | 39% | 14 | TX |
| 25641 | DN 14-Gold | 1455 | 7-9 | 35% | 14 | TX |
| 25642 | Optimus Volleyball 18-1 | 1455 | 20-39 | 34% | 18 | PA |
| 25643 | HHVBC 13-2g | 1455 | 1-2 | 25% | 13 | IA |
| 25644 | Thunder 16 (IA) | 1455 | 5-5 | 50% | 16 | IA |
| 25645 | Platform 16-Navy | 1455 | 14-17 | 37% | 16 | IA |
| 25646 | ASHOK 16-2 | 1455 | 21-16 | 57% | 16 | GA |
| 25647 | Idaho ONE 13-Im o'neil | 1455 | 17-30 | 36% | 13 | ID |
| 25648 | PEAK 11-4 | 1455 | 11-15 | 38% | 11 | OK |
| 25649 | United 15-Mehdi | 1455 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | HI |
| 25650 | Cangrejeras 12-Dimar | 1455 | 5-5 | 50% | 12 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.