Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 513 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25601 Vista 11-Airey 1455 2-3 40% 11 CA
25602 Champion 13-R purple 1455 2-3 40% 13 NC
25603 Onslow Freedom 16 1455 7-5 58% 16 NC
25604 Palm Beach Jrs 15-1 1455 11-13 46% 15 FL
25605 Mintonette Sports 14-5 1455 17-21 45% 14 OH
25606 THNDR 17-1 1455 3-2 60% 17 OH
25607 Greater Cincinnati Volleyball Club 17 17-Berling 1455 19-26 42% 17 OH
25608 LAV 13-Local black 1455 12-13 48% 13 AL
25609 Netforce 13-Annelyse 1455 14-20 39% 13 AL
25610 CMVBC 12-1 1455 2-3 40% 12 MO
25611 Southside Swarm VBC 12-1 1455 4-2 36% 12 MO
25612 Metro Volleyball Club 18-Central 1455 17-17 46% 18 DC
25613 Malulani M&M 12-S 1455 1-2 25% 12 HI
25614 Momentum 18-Blue 1455 18-24 43% 18 CO
25615 Architects Volleyball Club 15-Black 1455 14-18 38% 15 TX
25616 UVA 14-Club 1455 0-2 0% 14 CA
25617 Boss CLE Athletic Company 16-2 elite 1455 0-7 0% 16 OH
25618 Summit 17-Nat'l blue 1455 2-3 40% 17 TX
25619 Topeka Fury Volleyball Club 14-1 1455 3-4 43% 14 KS
25620 Illini NW 16U Teal 1455 6-7 46% 16 IL
25621 Top Flight 16-Psi sp 1455 3-1 75% 16 IL
25622 ELITE NEXT LEVEL 17-1 1455 9-12 41% 17 TX
25623 DBQ Mayhem 11-Girls 1455 1-2 25% 11 IA
25624 Storm 16 Gold 1455 9-12 43% 16
25625 Net Force 12 Legacy 1455 11-15 41% 12 IA
25626 Clark Fork Juniors 12-1 1455 2-2 50% 12 WA
25627 JJVA Club 13-G 1455 8-7 53% 13 FL
25628 Madison Starlings 17-Blue 1455 11-8 58% 17 WI
25629 Stars 16-S blue 1455 2-3 40% 16 MN
25630 Platinum 12-Ace 2 1455 1-3 25% 12 UT
25631 EASTSIDE ICE VOLLEYBALL CLUB 14 Eastside Ice Chill (WE) 1455 17-19 47% 14 NY
25632 CALI 14-White south 1455 20-21 49% 14 NY
25633 Maverick 13 Maroon 1455 20-29 41% 13 OH
25634 WGVC 14-2 elite purple 1455 33-36 48% 14 FL
25635 FH 12-Al'i-ninaaka 1455 0-1 0% 12 TX
25636 TX LEGACY 15 LIBERTY 1455 23-24 49% 15 TX
25637 Alabama Hellcats Volleyball Club 16 1455 10-9 53% 16 AL
25638 ARVBC 13-Purple 1455 3-5 38% 13 GA
25639 Rise 11-Blue 1455 2-3 40% 11 NE
25640 FW FIRE 14-2w 1455 9-11 39% 14 TX
25641 DN 14-Gold 1455 7-9 35% 14 TX
25642 Optimus Volleyball 18-1 1455 20-39 34% 18 PA
25643 HHVBC 13-2g 1455 1-2 25% 13 IA
25644 Thunder 16 (IA) 1455 5-5 50% 16 IA
25645 Platform 16-Navy 1455 14-17 37% 16 IA
25646 ASHOK 16-2 1455 21-16 57% 16 GA
25647 Idaho ONE 13-Im o'neil 1455 17-30 36% 13 ID
25648 PEAK 11-4 1455 11-15 38% 11 OK
25649 United 15-Mehdi 1455 4-4 50% 15 HI
25650 Cangrejeras 12-Dimar 1455 5-5 50% 12 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.