Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 511 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25501 Athletic Empire 14 1456 13-15 46% 14 TX
25502 BCS Skyline H 15-Silver 1456 13-14 46% 15 TX
25503 417 MoJrs 16-Nat royal 1456 12-14 46% 16 MO
25504 MN North 16-1 red 1456 42-34 55% 16 MN
25505 Ignite 14-Black 1456 21-16 55% 14 MA
25506 Integrity Elite 16 1456 28-24 53% 16 IL
25507 Conquest 15-J 1456 14-13 52% 15 NJ
25508 Top Flight 16-Gamma sp 1456 2-2 50% 16 IL
25509 Strike Force 18-Black 1456 24-20 55% 18 WA
25510 Sunshine 10-Typhoons 1456 18-23 44% 10 CA
25511 Vaqueras 15-F fanie 1456 9-9 50% 15 PR
25512 EHS 18 1456 6-4 60% 18 WA
25513 Rockford 10-White 1456 1-3 25% 10 MN
25514 NE D-League 16-White 1456 4-4 44% 16 IA
25515 Spark 15-1 natalie 1456 25-21 54% 15 CA
25516 Cannon Falls JO 15-1 1456 9-9 50% 15 MN
25517 Freedom Aces 13-S 1456 3-5 38% 13 IA
25518 LAVA North 16 Elite 1456 14-19 42% 16 CA
25519 OPU 10-1 1456 21-23 48% 10 FL
25520 Ballyhoo 18-Purple 1456 13-18 42% 18 PA
25521 NMB 12-Blue isa 1456 8-9 47% 12 FL
25522 Crossroads 14U White 1456 13-13 50% 14 TX
25523 Horsehoe VBC 13-White 1456 5-8 36% 13 PA
25524 IA VIBE 14-3 ombré 1456 3-7 30% 14 IA
25525 LEGACY 12-Premier jay 1456 26-36 42% 12 FL
25526 AVC 11-2 1456 5-7 36% 11 MN
25527 Wrecking Crew 12-Elite 1456 3-6 33% 12 TX
25528 Sporting Albany Girls 14 1456 14-18 44% 14 NY
25529 Amann 13-Gold 1456 13-13 50% 13 OH
25530 DVA 14-Pablo 1456 1-2 33% 14 PR
25531 Petite Elite 12 Heather 1456 5-6 28% 12 WA
25532 ESO 13-Navy 1456 1-3 25% 13 OH
25533 Mets 10-Agneris 1456 5-6 45% 10 PR
25534 Benson 18-1 1456 0-1 0% 18 MN
25535 Roncalli Juniors 12-2 1456 11-11 50% 12 IN
25536 Tribe 13-Premier cardinal 1456 19-23 45% 13 FL
25537 SBVC Girls 16 Premier 1456 24-20 55% 16 CA
25538 SWMVB 14-2 1456 11-8 52% 14 MT
25539 Livingston Peaks 14-1 1456 11-13 33% 14 MT
25540 Cowboys 12 1456 9-6 53% 12 UT
25541 FCA Force 13-1 savannah m 1456 6-8 43% 13 NC
25542 310VBC 17-N leo 1456 14-18 44% 17 CA
25543 Performance Volleyball G13-1 1456 2-5 22% 13
25544 LRVA 14-Orange 1456 1-3 25% 14
25545 IMPACT 17U Regional 1456 6-15 29% 17 AK
25546 Cedar Mountain Area JO 14-Blue 1456 2-2 50% 14 MN
25547 NLVC 18-National 1456 8-15 35% 18 TX
25548 HVC 15-1 heat 1456 2-3 40% 15 ON
25549 Club Velocity 14-1 1456 24-31 44% 14 MN
25550 Champion 15-N purple 1456 34-30 53% 15 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.