2025-2026 Season — Page 510 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25451 | CUVC 14-R rochelle | 1457 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | NC |
| 25452 | NEPA ELITE 13-Landslides | 1457 | 2-6 | 25% | 13 | PA |
| 25453 | Dynamix 13-Black | 1457 | 19-19 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 25454 | 808 AC 17-Marcy | 1457 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | HI |
| 25455 | 808 Athletic Club 14 Gabby | 1457 | 10-13 | 43% | 14 | HI |
| 25456 | AVA 17-Azmabeth | 1457 | 8-9 | 47% | 17 | FL |
| 25457 | Mesa Juniors VBCO 13-Teal | 1457 | 1-2 | 33% | 13 | CO |
| 25458 | Boiler Jrs 14-3mi slate | 1457 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | IN |
| 25459 | Storm 13-White kris | 1457 | 1-2 | 33% | 13 | CO |
| 25460 | Canon City Velocity 13 | 1457 | 2-4 | 33% | 13 | CO |
| 25461 | SPIRIT VBC 13-1 | 1457 | 21-19 | 53% | 13 | OH |
| 25462 | IVC 16-Black | 1457 | 3-6 | 33% | 16 | IA |
| 25463 | OneVA 15-2 | 1457 | 5-5 | 50% | 15 | KS |
| 25464 | RoVo 15-Blue | 1457 | 16-15 | 52% | 15 | VA |
| 25465 | OT 16-J je'bria | 1457 | 23-29 | 44% | 16 | FL |
| 25466 | SRJ 16-Pink | 1457 | 4-9 | 31% | 16 | WA |
| 25467 | Anamosa 15 | 1457 | 8-8 | 42% | 15 | IA |
| 25468 | 603 United 13-Seacoast blue | 1457 | 15-19 | 44% | 13 | NH |
| 25469 | TCVA 18-Green adidas | 1457 | 20-24 | 42% | 18 | TX |
| 25470 | EAVC 16-2 | 1457 | 9-20 | 31% | 16 | UT |
| 25471 | Cass County 15-1 black | 1457 | 14-12 | 54% | 15 | IN |
| 25472 | Kaohi 18 | 1457 | 18-17 | 51% | 18 | UT |
| 25473 | Momentum 14-1 | 1457 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | IN |
| 25474 | IMUA 14-Mizuno regional | 1457 | 15-12 | 56% | 14 | MI |
| 25475 | Conway Juniors 15 Synergy Titanium (14) | 1457 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | AR |
| 25476 | PAO STL 14-Rda white | 1457 | 19-14 | 58% | 14 | MO |
| 25477 | Cape Elite 15 Izzy | 1457 | 16-11 | 59% | 15 | FL |
| 25478 | NYCLBVC 11 | 1457 | 2-3 | 40% | 11 | NJ |
| 25479 | Madfrog East 18-Diamond | 1457 | 2-5 | 22% | 18 | |
| 25480 | Commanders 14 | 1457 | 7-10 | 39% | 14 | |
| 25481 | Midway Elite 13-Red | 1457 | 18-13 | 58% | 13 | IL |
| 25482 | Leaside Volleyball Club 17 Leaside Voltage | 1457 | 5-8 | 38% | 17 | ON |
| 25483 | FH 13-Ikaika-miranda | 1457 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | TX |
| 25484 | NWI Premier 12-Blue | 1457 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | IA |
| 25485 | CJVA 13-Ruby | 1457 | 12-13 | 48% | 13 | NJ |
| 25486 | Club Apex 15-White | 1457 | 11-12 | 48% | 15 | KY |
| 25487 | OPVBC 15 National | 1457 | 35-36 | 49% | 15 | WA |
| 25488 | Blue Horses Volleyball Club 12 Blue Horses Aqua (PR) | 1457 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | KY |
| 25489 | Silverton Bearcats 18-1 | 1456 | 25-19 | 57% | 18 | OR |
| 25490 | WC 17-2 | 1456 | 7-5 | 58% | 17 | GA |
| 25491 | TKVBC 15-1 | 1456 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | GA |
| 25492 | CPA 11 Chelsie | 1456 | 8-13 | 38% | 11 | WA |
| 25493 | Architects 17-Black | 1456 | 2-2 | 40% | 17 | |
| 25494 | Thundercats Volleyball 15 Thundercats Hydra (CA) | 1456 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | |
| 25495 | LUVC 16-1 | 1456 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | GA |
| 25496 | Georgina Riptide VBC 15 Georgina Riptide Currents | 1456 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | |
| 25497 | Academy 16-E banshees | 1456 | 31-49 | 39% | 16 | IN |
| 25498 | Cincy Classics 16-Black | 1456 | 18-21 | 46% | 16 | OH |
| 25499 | Apex Volleyball Academy 13 Apex Davidson | 1456 | 6-7 | 46% | 13 | OH |
| 25500 | WVVC 13-Green | 1456 | 16-18 | 46% | 13 | NY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.