Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 510 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25451 CUVC 14-R rochelle 1457 7-8 47% 14 NC
25452 NEPA ELITE 13-Landslides 1457 2-6 25% 13 PA
25453 Dynamix 13-Black 1457 19-19 50% 13 CA
25454 808 AC 17-Marcy 1457 1-3 25% 17 HI
25455 808 Athletic Club 14 Gabby 1457 10-13 43% 14 HI
25456 AVA 17-Azmabeth 1457 8-9 47% 17 FL
25457 Mesa Juniors VBCO 13-Teal 1457 1-2 33% 13 CO
25458 Boiler Jrs 14-3mi slate 1457 1-2 33% 14 IN
25459 Storm 13-White kris 1457 1-2 33% 13 CO
25460 Canon City Velocity 13 1457 2-4 33% 13 CO
25461 SPIRIT VBC 13-1 1457 21-19 53% 13 OH
25462 IVC 16-Black 1457 3-6 33% 16 IA
25463 OneVA 15-2 1457 5-5 50% 15 KS
25464 RoVo 15-Blue 1457 16-15 52% 15 VA
25465 OT 16-J je'bria 1457 23-29 44% 16 FL
25466 SRJ 16-Pink 1457 4-9 31% 16 WA
25467 Anamosa 15 1457 8-8 42% 15 IA
25468 603 United 13-Seacoast blue 1457 15-19 44% 13 NH
25469 TCVA 18-Green adidas 1457 20-24 42% 18 TX
25470 EAVC 16-2 1457 9-20 31% 16 UT
25471 Cass County 15-1 black 1457 14-12 54% 15 IN
25472 Kaohi 18 1457 18-17 51% 18 UT
25473 Momentum 14-1 1457 2-3 40% 14 IN
25474 IMUA 14-Mizuno regional 1457 15-12 56% 14 MI
25475 Conway Juniors 15 Synergy Titanium (14) 1457 2-5 29% 15 AR
25476 PAO STL 14-Rda white 1457 19-14 58% 14 MO
25477 Cape Elite 15 Izzy 1457 16-11 59% 15 FL
25478 NYCLBVC 11 1457 2-3 40% 11 NJ
25479 Madfrog East 18-Diamond 1457 2-5 22% 18
25480 Commanders 14 1457 7-10 39% 14
25481 Midway Elite 13-Red 1457 18-13 58% 13 IL
25482 Leaside Volleyball Club 17 Leaside Voltage 1457 5-8 38% 17 ON
25483 FH 13-Ikaika-miranda 1457 2-3 40% 13 TX
25484 NWI Premier 12-Blue 1457 2-3 40% 12 IA
25485 CJVA 13-Ruby 1457 12-13 48% 13 NJ
25486 Club Apex 15-White 1457 11-12 48% 15 KY
25487 OPVBC 15 National 1457 35-36 49% 15 WA
25488 Blue Horses Volleyball Club 12 Blue Horses Aqua (PR) 1457 2-2 50% 12 KY
25489 Silverton Bearcats 18-1 1456 25-19 57% 18 OR
25490 WC 17-2 1456 7-5 58% 17 GA
25491 TKVBC 15-1 1456 3-5 38% 15 GA
25492 CPA 11 Chelsie 1456 8-13 38% 11 WA
25493 Architects 17-Black 1456 2-2 40% 17
25494 Thundercats Volleyball 15 Thundercats Hydra (CA) 1456 3-4 43% 15
25495 LUVC 16-1 1456 3-5 38% 16 GA
25496 Georgina Riptide VBC 15 Georgina Riptide Currents 1456 3-2 60% 15
25497 Academy 16-E banshees 1456 31-49 39% 16 IN
25498 Cincy Classics 16-Black 1456 18-21 46% 16 OH
25499 Apex Volleyball Academy 13 Apex Davidson 1456 6-7 46% 13 OH
25500 WVVC 13-Green 1456 16-18 46% 13 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.