Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 491 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24501 ReNew Volleyball Club 18 18U ReNew VBC (XL) (1) 1465 7-4 41% 18
24502 GJ 12 SELECT 1465 14-20 41% 12 FL
24503 NE Elite 15-Ignite 1465 5-3 63% 15 NE
24504 Gold Cal Jrs Air 14-1 1465 17-23 43% 14 CA
24505 Uptime VB 14-Black 1465 19-15 56% 14 TN
24506 CID 14-Black 1465 14-12 54% 14 ID
24507 Rise 14-Katie 1465 7-8 47% 14 ID
24508 TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 14-1 1465 8-19 28% 14 TX
24509 OnSite Infinite Hustle 14 1465 38-30 54% 14 TX
24510 JKSports HEAT 14-National 1465 19-19 50% 14 VA
24511 Windom Zeds 12-1 fast 1465 2-4 29% 12 SD
24512 Club Tonka 13-1 1465 17-13 57% 13 MN
24513 BHJ 16-Gold 1465 3-2 60% 16 SD
24514 NE Top Flight 14-Blue 1465 1-2 25% 14 NE
24515 Independent 12-Dunfee 1465 2-2 50% 12 IN
24516 NE Top Flight 14-White 1465 1-2 25% 14 NE
24517 CADO 17-2 1465 3-2 60% 17 NY
24518 MVP 16-Orange 1465 6-5 55% 16 OH
24519 MADFROG 13-Elite black 1465 3-4 43% 13 TX
24520 Launch 15 1465 3-4 43% 15 MO
24521 CJVA 16-Ruby 1465 17-16 52% 16 NJ
24522 FVA 15-Blaze a 1465 12-16 41% 15 AK
24523 OT 15-T raul 1465 15-20 43% 15 FL
24524 Eclipse Volleyball Club 16 EVC Borton (OV) 1465 4-6 40% 16
24525 Boiler Jrs 13-R white 1465 20-20 50% 13 IN
24526 MADFROG 18-East diamond 1465 10-12 45% 18 TX
24527 Red Rock 15-Leandro - redwood city 1465 19-26 42% 15 CA
24528 NorCal Supreme 15-Blue 1465 3-5 38% 15 CA
24529 Alta Sierra 15-S 1465 12-16 43% 15 CA
24530 SIVBA 10-Steel 1465 3-5 33% 10 MO
24531 adidas DYNASTY 13-5 1465 3-2 60% 13 KS
24532 Vibe's 13-Black 1465 3-2 60% 13 CA
24533 Juggernaut 15-Regional1 1465 31-25 55% 15 CO
24534 Southern Storm 16 Ice 1465 21-25 46% 16 TN
24535 Blue Angels 16-Blue 1465 3-4 43% 16 WA
24536 Country Kids 14-S 1465 1-2 33% 14 HI
24537 Blues 12-1 gold 1465 10-10 48% 12 OR
24538 K2 12-Orange 1465 18-14 56% 12 TN
24539 Elite Alliance 14-Bury 1465 2-3 40% 14 SD
24540 Valley Fusion 14-Teal 1465 1-2 33% 14 CO
24541 Mass Premier 16-3 1465 16-13 55% 16 MA
24542 Metrowest VBC 16-Blue 1465 27-21 50% 16 MA
24543 2Legit 16-1 1465 3-3 50% 16 FL
24544 ATOMIC 16-Smack n2 1465 30-30 50% 16 AZ
24545 CJ Heat 14-Black 2 1465 3-3 50% 14 NJ
24546 NLV 18-1 1465 6-5 55% 18 GA
24547 ACCEL 11-Red lewis 1465 11-16 38% 11 TX
24548 Tigresas 16-A 1465 2-3 40% 16 PR
24549 Spark 18-1 maria 1465 19-22 46% 18 CA
24550 SoCal Athletics Volleyball Club 12-Beacons 1465 20-25 44% 12 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.