Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 492 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24551 Eastlake 12-Cala 1465 3-4 43% 12 CA
24552 Vibe VBC 12 Vibe, Jrs Orinda 1 1465 12-8 60% 12 CA
24553 Titan Premier 12-Ryann 1465 8-6 57% 12 CA
24554 Stewie 12-Blue 1465 16-22 42% 12 MN
24555 Club Fire 12-White 1465 2-2 50% 12 MN
24556 Centennial Volleyball Club 12-3 1465 12-8 60% 12 MN
24557 KaBoom 12-1 1465 5-7 42% 12 MN
24558 Blue Royals 12-Black 1465 3-3 50% 12 WA
24559 USA South 13-Elite jeff 1465 21-16 57% 13 FL
24560 Western Mass 17-Scar 1465 28-28 48% 17 MA
24561 Paris Purge 17 1465 8-8 44% 17 AR
24562 STX Digz 15-S 1465 9-11 45% 15 TX
24563 Mt. Hood 18-1 timberline 1465 8-7 53% 18 OR
24564 RCVS 10-1 angela 1465 9-13 41% 10 PR
24565 NIVBC 14-Sara 1465 8-11 42% 14 WA
24566 Niagara Frontier 15-Red 1465 15-15 47% 15 NY
24567 NH Brainerd 14-2 1465 2-2 50% 14 MN
24568 EVA 11-Green cox 1465 13-17 43% 11 KY
24569 KPV 13-White-s/z 1465 12-8 55% 13 KY
24570 LES 15-Silver 1465 16-9 53% 15 NY
24571 Boston United 15-Northeast 1465 29-27 52% 15 MA
24572 USA South 14-Elite kat 1465 17-17 50% 14 FL
24573 Sky High 13-Boelkens 1465 9-10 47% 13 IL
24574 p25 16-Fuji 1465 22-27 45% 16 OH
24575 Hype VB 17-Wilder 1465 12-12 44% 17 MS
24576 United Sports Academies 16 Brasil SV - Colégio Dante Alighieri 1465 4-5 44% 16
24577 Oxford Hype Volleyball Club 15 Oxford Hype Heat-1 1465 4-5 44% 15
24578 eteva 13 1465 2-3 40% 13
24579 DBQ Insanity 14-Blue 1465 7-10 39% 14 IA
24580 EVC 15-Falcons elite 1465 19-20 49% 15 FL
24581 Impact 14-Blue 1465 20-21 49% 14 TX
24582 Southwest 14-E emily 1464 23-27 46% 14 OH
24583 LA6 15-Taylor 1464 13-10 57% 15 LA
24584 SKYVBC 16-30 1464 31-24 53% 16 TX
24585 North Star 16 1464 2-2 50% 16 MN
24586 WV Galaxy 12 1464 12-13 48% 12 WV
24587 Rocky Elite 16-Nation 2 1464 3-4 43% 16 CO
24588 NYC Juniors Volleyball 15-Orange 1464 16-26 38% 15 NY
24589 Pursuit 13-Elite 1464 10-17 37% 13 MO
24590 Iowa United 11-1 elite 1464 16-19 46% 11 IA
24591 CVH SELECT 18-2 1464 9-11 45% 18 PR
24592 Katy Stars 15 Elite 1464 20-31 38% 15 TX
24593 Legit Royal 11 1464 1-2 25% 11 IA
24594 TVC 12-Royal 1464 10-15 40% 12 OH
24595 Idaho LUV 15-Jenna 1464 7-16 30% 15 ID
24596 London Elite 12-White 1464 2-2 50% 12 OH
24597 Sky High 16-Kolakowski 1464 6-5 55% 16 IL
24598 Emerald Rain 12 Elite 1464 31-32 49% 12 WA
24599 CCJ 14-2 1464 12-14 46% 14 OR
24600 Corpus Christi Storm 12-3 1464 12-8 60% 12 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.