2025-2026 Season — Page 492 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24551 | Eastlake 12-Cala | 1465 | 3-4 | 43% | 12 | CA |
| 24552 | Vibe VBC 12 Vibe, Jrs Orinda 1 | 1465 | 12-8 | 60% | 12 | CA |
| 24553 | Titan Premier 12-Ryann | 1465 | 8-6 | 57% | 12 | CA |
| 24554 | Stewie 12-Blue | 1465 | 16-22 | 42% | 12 | MN |
| 24555 | Club Fire 12-White | 1465 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 24556 | Centennial Volleyball Club 12-3 | 1465 | 12-8 | 60% | 12 | MN |
| 24557 | KaBoom 12-1 | 1465 | 5-7 | 42% | 12 | MN |
| 24558 | Blue Royals 12-Black | 1465 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | WA |
| 24559 | USA South 13-Elite jeff | 1465 | 21-16 | 57% | 13 | FL |
| 24560 | Western Mass 17-Scar | 1465 | 28-28 | 48% | 17 | MA |
| 24561 | Paris Purge 17 | 1465 | 8-8 | 44% | 17 | AR |
| 24562 | STX Digz 15-S | 1465 | 9-11 | 45% | 15 | TX |
| 24563 | Mt. Hood 18-1 timberline | 1465 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | OR |
| 24564 | RCVS 10-1 angela | 1465 | 9-13 | 41% | 10 | PR |
| 24565 | NIVBC 14-Sara | 1465 | 8-11 | 42% | 14 | WA |
| 24566 | Niagara Frontier 15-Red | 1465 | 15-15 | 47% | 15 | NY |
| 24567 | NH Brainerd 14-2 | 1465 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | MN |
| 24568 | EVA 11-Green cox | 1465 | 13-17 | 43% | 11 | KY |
| 24569 | KPV 13-White-s/z | 1465 | 12-8 | 55% | 13 | KY |
| 24570 | LES 15-Silver | 1465 | 16-9 | 53% | 15 | NY |
| 24571 | Boston United 15-Northeast | 1465 | 29-27 | 52% | 15 | MA |
| 24572 | USA South 14-Elite kat | 1465 | 17-17 | 50% | 14 | FL |
| 24573 | Sky High 13-Boelkens | 1465 | 9-10 | 47% | 13 | IL |
| 24574 | p25 16-Fuji | 1465 | 22-27 | 45% | 16 | OH |
| 24575 | Hype VB 17-Wilder | 1465 | 12-12 | 44% | 17 | MS |
| 24576 | United Sports Academies 16 Brasil SV - Colégio Dante Alighieri | 1465 | 4-5 | 44% | 16 | |
| 24577 | Oxford Hype Volleyball Club 15 Oxford Hype Heat-1 | 1465 | 4-5 | 44% | 15 | |
| 24578 | eteva 13 | 1465 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | |
| 24579 | DBQ Insanity 14-Blue | 1465 | 7-10 | 39% | 14 | IA |
| 24580 | EVC 15-Falcons elite | 1465 | 19-20 | 49% | 15 | FL |
| 24581 | Impact 14-Blue | 1465 | 20-21 | 49% | 14 | TX |
| 24582 | Southwest 14-E emily | 1464 | 23-27 | 46% | 14 | OH |
| 24583 | LA6 15-Taylor | 1464 | 13-10 | 57% | 15 | LA |
| 24584 | SKYVBC 16-30 | 1464 | 31-24 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 24585 | North Star 16 | 1464 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 24586 | WV Galaxy 12 | 1464 | 12-13 | 48% | 12 | WV |
| 24587 | Rocky Elite 16-Nation 2 | 1464 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | CO |
| 24588 | NYC Juniors Volleyball 15-Orange | 1464 | 16-26 | 38% | 15 | NY |
| 24589 | Pursuit 13-Elite | 1464 | 10-17 | 37% | 13 | MO |
| 24590 | Iowa United 11-1 elite | 1464 | 16-19 | 46% | 11 | IA |
| 24591 | CVH SELECT 18-2 | 1464 | 9-11 | 45% | 18 | PR |
| 24592 | Katy Stars 15 Elite | 1464 | 20-31 | 38% | 15 | TX |
| 24593 | Legit Royal 11 | 1464 | 1-2 | 25% | 11 | IA |
| 24594 | TVC 12-Royal | 1464 | 10-15 | 40% | 12 | OH |
| 24595 | Idaho LUV 15-Jenna | 1464 | 7-16 | 30% | 15 | ID |
| 24596 | London Elite 12-White | 1464 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | OH |
| 24597 | Sky High 16-Kolakowski | 1464 | 6-5 | 55% | 16 | IL |
| 24598 | Emerald Rain 12 Elite | 1464 | 31-32 | 49% | 12 | WA |
| 24599 | CCJ 14-2 | 1464 | 12-14 | 46% | 14 | OR |
| 24600 | Corpus Christi Storm 12-3 | 1464 | 12-8 | 60% | 12 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.