2025-2026 Season — Page 490 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24451 | Circle City Elite 13 Circle City Whip | 1466 | 5-4 | 56% | 13 | IN |
| 24452 | Cats Volleyball 16 | 1466 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | IA |
| 24453 | Capitals 14-United | 1466 | 13-15 | 46% | 14 | NJ |
| 24454 | Zona VBC 15-R2 | 1466 | 13-9 | 59% | 15 | AZ |
| 24455 | Bettendorf 11 | 1466 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | IA |
| 24456 | White Hawks 14-1 | 1466 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | MN |
| 24457 | Avidity 12-Jade | 1466 | 14-11 | 54% | 12 | MA |
| 24458 | ONE Volleyball 10-1 | 1466 | 5-5 | 50% | 10 | GA |
| 24459 | NoDak Juniors 14-2 | 1466 | 6-10 | 29% | 14 | ND |
| 24460 | Stanly Extreme 13 Bryan | 1466 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | NC |
| 24461 | Metrowest VBC 16-Silver | 1466 | 20-24 | 43% | 16 | MA |
| 24462 | H SBS 13-Elite | 1466 | 7-10 | 41% | 13 | TX |
| 24463 | MiElite 14-Ellie north | 1466 | 8-10 | 36% | 14 | MI |
| 24464 | Sharks 12 Navy | 1466 | 26-38 | 41% | 12 | AL |
| 24465 | MIDTN 18-Black | 1466 | 14-19 | 42% | 18 | TN |
| 24466 | AMBITION 14-1 elite | 1466 | 9-9 | 50% | 14 | WA |
| 24467 | Criollas 10-1 | 1465 | 7-7 | 50% | 10 | PR |
| 24468 | Crazy 18-S black | 1465 | 5-10 | 33% | 18 | MI |
| 24469 | Underwood Volleyball Club 17 Slammers | 1465 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | MN |
| 24470 | Mt. Hood 16-2 meadows | 1465 | 32-23 | 58% | 16 | OR |
| 24471 | Tribe 10-1 | 1465 | 2-3 | 40% | 10 | OH |
| 24472 | G2 United 15-1 | 1465 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | WA |
| 24473 | MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 13 MOCO (MD) Majestics | 1465 | 6-6 | 50% | 13 | MD |
| 24474 | 85 South VBC 16-Red | 1465 | 16-11 | 59% | 16 | GA |
| 24475 | Miami Hype 13-Prep2 | 1465 | 12-12 | 50% | 13 | FL |
| 24476 | Princeton Volleyball Club 14-2 | 1465 | 4-9 | 31% | 14 | NJ |
| 24477 | Jellys 13-Black | 1465 | 24-16 | 60% | 13 | FL |
| 24478 | Crank It 16-Gold | 1465 | 19-14 | 58% | 16 | MI |
| 24479 | Eastside 14-S saunders | 1465 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | OH |
| 24480 | TXP 17-Black adam | 1465 | 14-27 | 34% | 17 | TX |
| 24481 | Dead Frog 12-Black | 1465 | 12-13 | 48% | 12 | MI |
| 24482 | Marshall JO 11-Orange | 1465 | 3-5 | 33% | 11 | MN |
| 24483 | TPV 15-Renegade | 1465 | 9-11 | 45% | 15 | TN |
| 24484 | OPVC 12-Tonn | 1465 | 1-3 | 25% | 12 | OH |
| 24485 | Vail Peak 12 | 1465 | 23-20 | 53% | 12 | CO |
| 24486 | MAVA 15-GreatWhite | 1465 | 26-23 | 53% | 15 | KY |
| 24487 | Fremont Flames 12 | 1465 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | CO |
| 24488 | Aus Velocity 12-Lt black | 1465 | 6-5 | 50% | 12 | TX |
| 24489 | Velocity 12-1 | 1465 | 1-3 | 25% | 12 | OH |
| 24490 | RVC 12-Relentless | 1465 | 27-25 | 52% | 12 | CO |
| 24491 | Idaho ONE 15-Mccall | 1465 | 11-18 | 38% | 15 | ID |
| 24492 | Fusion 14-1 (BG) | 1465 | 3-4 | 33% | 14 | WI |
| 24493 | Legit 11-G royal | 1465 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | IA |
| 24494 | Golden State 16-Gold | 1465 | 14-11 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 24495 | Empower 16-National black | 1465 | 19-34 | 36% | 16 | CA |
| 24496 | Top Flight Volleyball Academy 18-National red | 1465 | 20-24 | 45% | 18 | NV |
| 24497 | M1 18-Blue | 1465 | 21-23 | 48% | 18 | TN |
| 24498 | Revolution 13 Cicily | 1465 | 6-8 | 43% | 13 | NC |
| 24499 | Mana Toa 12-1 | 1465 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | AL |
| 24500 | TI Elite 18.2 | 1465 | 15-23 | 39% | 18 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.