Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 490 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24451 Circle City Elite 13 Circle City Whip 1466 5-4 56% 13 IN
24452 Cats Volleyball 16 1466 2-3 40% 16 IA
24453 Capitals 14-United 1466 13-15 46% 14 NJ
24454 Zona VBC 15-R2 1466 13-9 59% 15 AZ
24455 Bettendorf 11 1466 2-2 50% 11 IA
24456 White Hawks 14-1 1466 2-3 40% 14 MN
24457 Avidity 12-Jade 1466 14-11 54% 12 MA
24458 ONE Volleyball 10-1 1466 5-5 50% 10 GA
24459 NoDak Juniors 14-2 1466 6-10 29% 14 ND
24460 Stanly Extreme 13 Bryan 1466 4-6 40% 13 NC
24461 Metrowest VBC 16-Silver 1466 20-24 43% 16 MA
24462 H SBS 13-Elite 1466 7-10 41% 13 TX
24463 MiElite 14-Ellie north 1466 8-10 36% 14 MI
24464 Sharks 12 Navy 1466 26-38 41% 12 AL
24465 MIDTN 18-Black 1466 14-19 42% 18 TN
24466 AMBITION 14-1 elite 1466 9-9 50% 14 WA
24467 Criollas 10-1 1465 7-7 50% 10 PR
24468 Crazy 18-S black 1465 5-10 33% 18 MI
24469 Underwood Volleyball Club 17 Slammers 1465 1-3 25% 17 MN
24470 Mt. Hood 16-2 meadows 1465 32-23 58% 16 OR
24471 Tribe 10-1 1465 2-3 40% 10 OH
24472 G2 United 15-1 1465 4-3 57% 15 WA
24473 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 13 MOCO (MD) Majestics 1465 6-6 50% 13 MD
24474 85 South VBC 16-Red 1465 16-11 59% 16 GA
24475 Miami Hype 13-Prep2 1465 12-12 50% 13 FL
24476 Princeton Volleyball Club 14-2 1465 4-9 31% 14 NJ
24477 Jellys 13-Black 1465 24-16 60% 13 FL
24478 Crank It 16-Gold 1465 19-14 58% 16 MI
24479 Eastside 14-S saunders 1465 2-2 50% 14 OH
24480 TXP 17-Black adam 1465 14-27 34% 17 TX
24481 Dead Frog 12-Black 1465 12-13 48% 12 MI
24482 Marshall JO 11-Orange 1465 3-5 33% 11 MN
24483 TPV 15-Renegade 1465 9-11 45% 15 TN
24484 OPVC 12-Tonn 1465 1-3 25% 12 OH
24485 Vail Peak 12 1465 23-20 53% 12 CO
24486 MAVA 15-GreatWhite 1465 26-23 53% 15 KY
24487 Fremont Flames 12 1465 1-2 33% 12 CO
24488 Aus Velocity 12-Lt black 1465 6-5 50% 12 TX
24489 Velocity 12-1 1465 1-3 25% 12 OH
24490 RVC 12-Relentless 1465 27-25 52% 12 CO
24491 Idaho ONE 15-Mccall 1465 11-18 38% 15 ID
24492 Fusion 14-1 (BG) 1465 3-4 33% 14 WI
24493 Legit 11-G royal 1465 2-2 50% 11 IA
24494 Golden State 16-Gold 1465 14-11 56% 16 CA
24495 Empower 16-National black 1465 19-34 36% 16 CA
24496 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 18-National red 1465 20-24 45% 18 NV
24497 M1 18-Blue 1465 21-23 48% 18 TN
24498 Revolution 13 Cicily 1465 6-8 43% 13 NC
24499 Mana Toa 12-1 1465 2-3 40% 12 AL
24500 TI Elite 18.2 1465 15-23 39% 18 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.