Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 480 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23951 DCVA 16-3 1470 3-2 43% 16 CO
23952 HC Strike 15-Mamba black 1470 20-23 47% 15 TX
23953 ACCEL 15-Red ocheskey 1470 16-15 50% 15 TX
23954 MN Attack 13-2 1470 9-10 47% 13 MN
23955 KC Dominance 17-1 1470 3-2 60% 17
23956 Forest City Hickory 14-3 1470 6-4 60% 14 OH
23957 ICE 16-Premier 1470 4-9 31% 16 WA
23958 Independent 13-Davis 1470 1-2 33% 13 IN
23959 Enid IMPACT 14 Navy 1470 9-7 56% 14 OK
23960 Atlantic Volleyball Academy 13-Premier 3 1470 16-14 53% 13 NY
23961 LI Surge Volleyball Club 13-Premier white 1470 2-3 40% 13 NY
23962 PSVC 16-Zuri 1470 15-29 34% 16 SC
23963 603 United 14-Seacoast blue 1470 17-16 52% 14 NH
23964 Silverton Bearcats 14-3 1470 15-11 56% 14 OR
23965 HBJ 17-Daitona 1470 6-10 38% 17 AR
23966 AZ Valor 17-1 1470 30-29 51% 17 AZ
23967 Iowa Impact 13-2 premier 1470 15-13 48% 13 IA
23968 Adrenaline 13-Roxanne 1470 22-25 47% 13 IA
23969 CGSV 13-Nagel 1470 2-2 50% 13 OH
23970 LAVA 13-3 r 1470 9-10 47% 13 OH
23971 Synergy 13-Mangas 1470 2-2 50% 13 OH
23972 Pine Bush VBC 14 1470 1-3 25% 14 PA
23973 Starlings Cudahy 17-S black 1470 19-10 66% 17 CA
23974 Greenwich Volleyball Club 17-2 1470 9-19 32% 17 CT
23975 Bristol Crush 17-Riley 1470 18-8 62% 17 CT
23976 Gulf Coast 13-Thunder 1470 2-2 50% 13 FL
23977 Phoenix Rising 15-1 1470 3-2 60% 15 TN
23978 VIPER 15 Elite 1470 17-27 39% 15 TN
23979 LBJ 14-3 1470 2-2 40% 14 ND
23980 Black Canyon 13-S debbie 1470 2-2 50% 13 CO
23981 Mt. Hood 13-2 meadows 1470 17-25 40% 13 OR
23982 Trinity 17 Inferno 1470 21-26 45% 17 FL
23983 ARMOR 14-Kilo 1470 16-21 43% 14 SC
23984 VVB 17-Mike 1470 22-19 54% 17 GA
23985 Volitude 13-Red 1470 24-17 59% 13 CA
23986 UVA 13 Power 1470 22-30 42% 13 CA
23987 SG Elite 13 Storm 1470 11-6 65% 13 CA
23988 TOVC 13-Yeye 1470 4-4 44% 13 PR
23989 Elite Alliance 13-1 1470 1-3 20% 13 SD
23990 CEV Diamond 16-2 1470 10-17 37% 16 OH
23991 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 12 Weber Elite Kelsey 1470 4-5 33% 12 UT
23992 Mobile Storm 16 National 1470 11-33 25% 16 AL
23993 SMVA 16-1 1470 14-15 47% 16 AL
23994 SPORTING EDGE 13-Armour 1470 11-9 55% 13 TX
23995 STVA 13-Navy 1470 27-33 44% 13 TX
23996 Destiny 13-White 1470 4-5 40% 13 TX
23997 Legends 15-Black 1470 0-1 0% 15 PR
23998 Schuylkill Eclipse 15-Lunar 1470 2-3 29% 15 PA
23999 KC FIRE 14-1 1470 5-4 56% 14 MO
24000 HPSTL 14-Gray 1470 17-26 40% 14 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.