Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 481 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
24001 CVVC 17-1 1470 16-20 37% 17 MT
24002 HN STORM 17 HN STORM BLUE (NO) 1470 5-4 56% 17 ND
24003 South Central NE 17-White 1470 1-2 33% 17 NE
24004 Set Above Volleyball Academy 16 SAVA Avalanche 1470 6-6 50% 16 NY
24005 MVC 15 MVC - Biedermann (6) 1470 2-2 50% 15 OH
24006 Tstreet SN 16-Jesse 1470 14-14 50% 16 NV
24007 South County 13-Abigail 1470 7-20 23% 13 UT
24008 Club Cactus 16-Navy 1470 18-12 60% 16 AZ
24009 SNVF 13-Mount rainier 1470 2-3 40% 13 WA
24010 Mojo 17-A 1470 6-5 55% 17 OH
24011 AVA 14-National 1470 14-25 36% 14 AL
24012 ArkJrs. MH 14-S red 1470 10-6 63% 14 AR
24013 SI Wave 16-Red 1470 5-7 36% 16 MO
24014 Rise 12-Brooklyn & jess 1470 16-13 55% 12 ID
24015 SDVBC 14-Cara 1470 20-19 51% 14 CA
24016 Golden State 14-Gold 1470 9-10 47% 14 CA
24017 Dubuque Insanity 12-Black 1470 1-2 25% 12 IA
24018 Anamosa 12 1470 6-7 43% 12 IA
24019 NET 15-Black 1470 9-10 39% 15 AR
24020 Illini Elite 15-L navy 1470 16-15 52% 15 IL
24021 Storm Cyclones 16-2 1470 2-3 40% 16 MI
24022 GVJ 12 Leah 1470 15-6 71% 12 AZ
24023 Parker VC 12-S 1470 10-8 56% 12 AZ
24024 AV Coach Liz 16 1470 5-4 56% 16 CA
24025 Galaxy 15 Allison 1470 13-14 48% 15 NC
24026 CMASS Academy 14-White 1470 2-1 67% 14 MA
24027 Gators 14-Green 1470 19-22 46% 14 MA
24028 Club Gold VB 11-Grape 1470 3-3 50% 11 WA
24029 MJVA 11-National black 1470 13-20 36% 11 TN
24030 Club Fusion 18-2 national 1470 15-15 50% 18 IL
24031 Excel 14-National gold 1470 2-5 29% 14 TX
24032 Monti Club JO 15-1 1470 10-11 42% 15 MN
24033 Ridgeland Reds 15-Red 1470 3-5 38% 15 MN
24034 Red Storm 18-National 1470 3-4 43% 18 LA
24035 AAC 14 Local 1470 16-9 64% 14 FL
24036 AVC 14-1 1470 25-24 51% 14 FL
24037 SKEVA EAST 16-1 1470 22-14 61% 16 KY
24038 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 15-White 1470 30-27 53% 15 FL
24039 No Limits 15-Navy 1470 27-30 47% 15 FL
24040 Shelby Elite Volleyball Club 14-1 1470 6-6 50% 14 IN
24041 Marion Magic 14-Regional 1470 5-4 36% 14 IA
24042 Knoxville 16 1470 2-2 50% 16 IA
24043 Sumter VBC 18-Gray 1470 22-19 54% 18 SC
24044 NIVA South 10-Penguins 1470 2-3 40% 10 IN
24045 Webo 10-2s kayla 1470 4-8 33% 10 IN
24046 Solon Spartans 15-Black 1470 2-3 40% 15 IA
24047 HJV 18 NATIONAL 1470 12-18 40% 18 TX
24048 Performance 15-1 navy 1470 2-2 50% 15
24049 Genesis Volleyball Academy 17-1 1470 2-2 50% 17
24050 iCrush 16-Black 1470 15-12 45% 16 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.