Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 479 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23901 NM HEAT 16-1 1471 2-3 40% 16 MI
23902 Pipeline 14-Ultra reilly 1471 19-18 51% 14 CA
23903 OCV 18-1 1471 2-2 50% 18 ID
23904 Legacy Elite VBA 12-N 1471 16-20 44% 12 OH
23905 Impact 15-Ella 1471 14-8 64% 15 MI
23906 Xtreme VBC 15-Red 1471 14-12 54% 15 WI
23907 STRIKE 12-White 1471 22-14 61% 12 AZ
23908 JAG VBC 16-2 national 1471 31-29 52% 16 WI
23909 Oasis 15 National 1471 24-23 51% 15 CA
23910 Ignite Volleyball Club Minot 16-Blaze 1471 2-5 25% 16 ND
23911 Wilsonville Wild 14-1 1471 12-17 39% 14 OR
23912 WI Flight 16-Antigo 1471 2-3 40% 16 WI
23913 85 South VBC 18-Red 1471 17-14 55% 18 GA
23914 Mid City VBC 16-Black 1471 16-19 46% 16 CA
23915 LVA 14-National red 1471 15-14 42% 14 TX
23916 Harmoni 16-1 1471 14-13 52% 16 CA
23917 Iowa Vortex 14-Claudia 1471 2-3 40% 14 IA
23918 BVA WB 15-Orange lakyn 1471 8-12 40% 15 KY
23919 Force 12-1 1471 2-3 40% 12 MS
23920 Cyclones 14-E chaparrals 1471 23-19 49% 14 IL
23921 CRVBC 14-2 condors 1471 13-17 41% 14 NH
23922 Hunter's 15-Marizel 1471 2-2 50% 15 FL
23923 HHVBC 13-1g 1471 6-11 32% 13 IA
23924 SA Juniors 15-Baden 2 1471 21-31 40% 15 TX
23925 319 United 13-Spooner 1471 3-3 50% 13 IA
23926 Wrecking Crew 14-Black 1471 1-2 33% 14 TX
23927 Western Elite 14 1471 2-3 40% 14 WI
23928 Wisconsin Ice 14-Purple 1471 13-15 46% 14 WI
23929 Northern Storm 14-2 1471 6-4 60% 14 WI
23930 Auburn Thunder 15 1471 3-6 33% 15 CA
23931 CG 13-Black 1471 4-4 50% 13 WA
23932 OVVC 14-Silver 1471 2-2 50% 14 OH
23933 Aleta 14-3 1471 3-3 50% 14 OH
23934 LVC 17-A 1471 8-8 50% 17 ID
23935 Independent 14-Zonker 1471 2-2 50% 14 IN
23936 573 14-National t 1471 12-13 48% 14 MO
23937 Prime Performance 15-Pink 1471 4-3 57% 15 AZ
23938 Slainte 12-White 1471 19-28 40% 12 CA
23939 StingrayVBA 13-Select aw 1471 2-2 50% 13
23940 Canada West Volleyball Club 15-Girls - black 1471 3-4 43% 15
23941 MAVS 816 16-2 1471 2-3 40% 16 KS
23942 Bluewater Ballistix Blizzards 15 Bluewater Ballistix Blizzards 1471 3-4 43% 15
23943 Mountain One VBC 16-1 1471 11-8 50% 16 MT
23944 SURGE 14-Blue 1470 17-15 53% 14 RI
23945 Ottawa Fusion Volleyball Club 16 Ottawa Fusion Red - Cassey 1470 3-4 43% 16 ON
23946 BVC 14 1470 2-2 50% 14 IA
23947 ProPlay 16 Bahman 1470 20-14 59% 16 CA
23948 501 Volley 13-4 regional 1470 19-13 59% 13 AR
23949 Loser of 16-Bronze m1 1470 0-1 0% 16
23950 Dawson Creek Volleyball Club 15-Red 1470 3-4 43% 15
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.