Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 478 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23851 AUVC 16 1471 14-14 50% 16 TN
23852 WSRVC 12-Evie/jeff 1471 4-6 40% 12 WY
23853 LTX SELECT 11-Blue 1471 4-6 36% 11 TX
23854 CALI 16-Red/gold 1471 4-3 57% 16 NY
23855 540 VB 14 Navy 1471 17-18 49% 14 VA
23856 BIP Sweden 18 1471 3-1 75% 18 FL
23857 Midwest Penguins 17-1 1471 26-28 48% 17 WI
23858 KSA 15-Blue 1471 20-20 50% 15 KY
23859 Texas Diamonds 14-Black 1471 17-14 53% 14 TX
23860 Ballistic 14-Black 1471 1-1 25% 14 MI
23861 MOD Volleyball Club 13-Gold north 1471 2-3 40% 13 IL
23862 Allons 13-Jessica 1471 18-20 46% 13 LA
23863 Trojans JO Volleyball 14 Trojans JO 1471 1-1 25% 14 MN
23864 OPVBC 12-Strikers 1471 8-10 44% 12 WA
23865 Potlatch Timber Volleyball Club 12-Green 1471 3-2 60% 12 WA
23866 KMS SAINTS JO 17-Schultz 1471 3-3 50% 17 MN
23867 Dream Chasers 16-Purple 1471 30-24 56% 16 GA
23868 JAG VBC 18-2 1471 8-7 53% 18 WI
23869 Idaho ONE 16-Central 1471 5-8 33% 16 ID
23870 EPAN 14U 1471 12-13 43% 14 WV
23871 LV 10 Avoli 1471 14-18 44% 10 TX
23872 Elite Level Volleyball 15-S 1471 2-1 67% 15 NC
23873 Club 1 SS 12 1471 1-2 33% 12 IL
23874 Laker JO 12-2 1471 1-2 33% 12 MN
23875 DINAMITE 18-2 1471 4-4 50% 18 CA
23876 BORINQUEN COQUI 15-3f 1471 7-7 50% 15 PR
23877 Riptide 16-Tsunami 1471 13-23 36% 16 ID
23878 WAVE 18-Olivia 1471 20-20 50% 18 CA
23879 CPVB 14-Select 1471 13-15 39% 14 CT
23880 Mountain View Volleyball Club 12 MVVC Youth G 6-Kianna 1471 4-4 50% 12 CA
23881 Quickset 14-Blue 1471 15-14 52% 14 PA
23882 TPV 13-Navy 1471 27-18 60% 13 TN
23883 FTL 16-Nuclear k 1471 3-4 43% 16 FL
23884 MoCo Jrs 13 Molten 1471 7-10 39% 13 TX
23885 Normal Flight 12-1 1471 10-11 48% 12 IL
23886 MSVC 16-Adidas anthony 1471 26-30 46% 16 FL
23887 Havoc 15-Purple 1471 14-20 38% 15 MN
23888 EVC Blue 13 1471 8-9 47% 13 IN
23889 Sideout 14-Red 1471 8-6 57% 14 WA
23890 KIVA 14-Brooke 1471 1-1 50% 14 KY
23891 GSI 16-Green venice 1471 1-13 7% 16 FL
23892 SA Destination 12-1 1471 6-5 55% 12 TX
23893 FORZA1 11-One 1471 14-12 54% 11 CA
23894 Academy North 11-Hp-1 1471 46-60 43% 11 CA
23895 Blue Horses Volleyball Club 14 Blue Horses White (PR) 1471 24-19 56% 14 KY
23896 Eclipse volleyball Club 17-Orange 1471 7-9 44% 17
23897 Oklahoma Empire Volleyball Club 14 OKEVC (OK) 1471 16-11 57% 14 OK
23898 Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 15 15 Thunder 1471 4-5 44% 15 WV
23899 SMCJV 14U BLUE 1471 17-14 47% 14 MD
23900 FaR Out 16-White 1471 18-9 67% 16 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.