Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 477 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23801 Empower Juniors 16-1 1472 14-8 64% 16 TX
23802 Vista 12-Kreiter 1472 2-3 40% 12 CA
23803 Inner City Angels 12-1 1472 19-23 45% 12 CA
23804 POVBC 14-Pink 1472 2-2 50% 14 OH
23805 Presidio VIP Elite 12 1472 4-8 33% 12 TX
23806 Horizonvbc 15-1 1472 17-24 41% 15 CA
23807 FCA One 16-Black 1472 18-40 31% 16 CO
23808 DIG 10-A black 1472 2-3 40% 10 TX
23809 WF Elite 10-Black 1472 5-7 42% 10 TX
23810 ECVA 14-Hernandez 1472 23-11 56% 14 MT
23811 G3 14-National abby 1472 35-30 54% 14 MO
23812 MiElite 15-Sapphire east 1472 18-10 64% 15 MI
23813 MVC Panthers 12-Pink 1472 13-9 59% 12 IL
23814 IDAHO STORM 12-1 1472 8-6 57% 12 ID
23815 Alliance 13 Regional 1472 19-18 51% 13 TN
23816 Cape Coast 13 DISCOVERY 1472 27-23 54% 13 FL
23817 CE LFT - Lite 13-Therese 1472 7-4 64% 13 LA
23818 United 14-Bhm black 1472 12-18 40% 14 AL
23819 Impact 14-Emma 1472 8-4 67% 14 MI
23820 Blaine 14-2 1472 8-6 57% 14 MN
23821 Girls 15-Elite 1472 23-35 40% 15 NV
23822 Wolf Pack 16-Black 1472 11-17 39% 16 TX
23823 JJVA Club 14-B 1471 9-14 39% 14 FL
23824 DBQ Insanity 13-1 1471 2-3 40% 13 IA
23825 AVA Texas 18-Attack 1471 2-2 50% 18 NV
23826 CID 12-Black 1471 12-16 43% 12 ID
23827 JAX SKYLINE 13-Grey 1471 4-5 44% 13 FL
23828 MOXIE COQUI TUPELO 16 1471 14-14 47% 16 MS
23829 Topeka Elite 18-2 1471 3-4 43% 18 KS
23830 TDV 16-National 1471 23-17 57% 16 OH
23831 CinciVB Acad 11-Bowden 1471 9-9 50% 11 OH
23832 EPFury 15 1471 17-13 57% 15 TX
23833 CAVC 16-Power black 1471 14-12 54% 16 VA
23834 MENTALITY 16-1 1471 15-14 52% 16
23835 Ridgeland Reds-White 15 1471 20-22 48% 15 WI
23836 WTNVB 10-1 1471 2-4 33% 10 TN
23837 Eudora Chaos Volleyball Club 12-1 1471 3-4 43% 12 KS
23838 Lansing Volleyball Club 14-1 1471 2-3 40% 14 NY
23839 Tribe 18-Vktry white 1471 8-30 21% 18 FL
23840 Ka Ulukoa 14 Hula 1471 7-6 54% 14 HI
23841 SPVA 16-2 1471 2-3 40% 16 MN
23842 Elevate Ak Volleyball Club 18 13 Ruby (AK) 1471 1-3 25% 18 AK
23843 Princeton 13-Blue 1471 37-41 47% 13 NJ
23844 Krackens 16 13 1471 1-4 20% 13 CA
23845 Long Island Surge 13-Premier blue 1471 9-8 53% 13 NJ
23846 JVC San Lorenzo 16-2 1471 5-2 71% 16 PR
23847 Mass Pats 16-2 character 1471 15-14 47% 16 MA
23848 BSVBC 11-Gray 1471 13-13 43% 11 IL
23849 ID Peak 15-Grace baker 1471 2-3 25% 15 UT
23850 Whiteout 17-1 1471 13-12 52% 17 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.