2025-2026 Season — Page 477 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23801 | Empower Juniors 16-1 | 1472 | 14-8 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 23802 | Vista 12-Kreiter | 1472 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | CA |
| 23803 | Inner City Angels 12-1 | 1472 | 19-23 | 45% | 12 | CA |
| 23804 | POVBC 14-Pink | 1472 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | OH |
| 23805 | Presidio VIP Elite 12 | 1472 | 4-8 | 33% | 12 | TX |
| 23806 | Horizonvbc 15-1 | 1472 | 17-24 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 23807 | FCA One 16-Black | 1472 | 18-40 | 31% | 16 | CO |
| 23808 | DIG 10-A black | 1472 | 2-3 | 40% | 10 | TX |
| 23809 | WF Elite 10-Black | 1472 | 5-7 | 42% | 10 | TX |
| 23810 | ECVA 14-Hernandez | 1472 | 23-11 | 56% | 14 | MT |
| 23811 | G3 14-National abby | 1472 | 35-30 | 54% | 14 | MO |
| 23812 | MiElite 15-Sapphire east | 1472 | 18-10 | 64% | 15 | MI |
| 23813 | MVC Panthers 12-Pink | 1472 | 13-9 | 59% | 12 | IL |
| 23814 | IDAHO STORM 12-1 | 1472 | 8-6 | 57% | 12 | ID |
| 23815 | Alliance 13 Regional | 1472 | 19-18 | 51% | 13 | TN |
| 23816 | Cape Coast 13 DISCOVERY | 1472 | 27-23 | 54% | 13 | FL |
| 23817 | CE LFT - Lite 13-Therese | 1472 | 7-4 | 64% | 13 | LA |
| 23818 | United 14-Bhm black | 1472 | 12-18 | 40% | 14 | AL |
| 23819 | Impact 14-Emma | 1472 | 8-4 | 67% | 14 | MI |
| 23820 | Blaine 14-2 | 1472 | 8-6 | 57% | 14 | MN |
| 23821 | Girls 15-Elite | 1472 | 23-35 | 40% | 15 | NV |
| 23822 | Wolf Pack 16-Black | 1472 | 11-17 | 39% | 16 | TX |
| 23823 | JJVA Club 14-B | 1471 | 9-14 | 39% | 14 | FL |
| 23824 | DBQ Insanity 13-1 | 1471 | 2-3 | 40% | 13 | IA |
| 23825 | AVA Texas 18-Attack | 1471 | 2-2 | 50% | 18 | NV |
| 23826 | CID 12-Black | 1471 | 12-16 | 43% | 12 | ID |
| 23827 | JAX SKYLINE 13-Grey | 1471 | 4-5 | 44% | 13 | FL |
| 23828 | MOXIE COQUI TUPELO 16 | 1471 | 14-14 | 47% | 16 | MS |
| 23829 | Topeka Elite 18-2 | 1471 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | KS |
| 23830 | TDV 16-National | 1471 | 23-17 | 57% | 16 | OH |
| 23831 | CinciVB Acad 11-Bowden | 1471 | 9-9 | 50% | 11 | OH |
| 23832 | EPFury 15 | 1471 | 17-13 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 23833 | CAVC 16-Power black | 1471 | 14-12 | 54% | 16 | VA |
| 23834 | MENTALITY 16-1 | 1471 | 15-14 | 52% | 16 | |
| 23835 | Ridgeland Reds-White 15 | 1471 | 20-22 | 48% | 15 | WI |
| 23836 | WTNVB 10-1 | 1471 | 2-4 | 33% | 10 | TN |
| 23837 | Eudora Chaos Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1471 | 3-4 | 43% | 12 | KS |
| 23838 | Lansing Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1471 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | NY |
| 23839 | Tribe 18-Vktry white | 1471 | 8-30 | 21% | 18 | FL |
| 23840 | Ka Ulukoa 14 Hula | 1471 | 7-6 | 54% | 14 | HI |
| 23841 | SPVA 16-2 | 1471 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | MN |
| 23842 | Elevate Ak Volleyball Club 18 13 Ruby (AK) | 1471 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | AK |
| 23843 | Princeton 13-Blue | 1471 | 37-41 | 47% | 13 | NJ |
| 23844 | Krackens 16 13 | 1471 | 1-4 | 20% | 13 | CA |
| 23845 | Long Island Surge 13-Premier blue | 1471 | 9-8 | 53% | 13 | NJ |
| 23846 | JVC San Lorenzo 16-2 | 1471 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | PR |
| 23847 | Mass Pats 16-2 character | 1471 | 15-14 | 47% | 16 | MA |
| 23848 | BSVBC 11-Gray | 1471 | 13-13 | 43% | 11 | IL |
| 23849 | ID Peak 15-Grace baker | 1471 | 2-3 | 25% | 15 | UT |
| 23850 | Whiteout 17-1 | 1471 | 13-12 | 52% | 17 | CO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.