Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 476 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23751 BTownVBC 16-Black 1472 25-18 58% 16 IN
23752 Eclipse 15-1 (NE) 1472 13-18 42% 15 NY
23753 TAV 16-Glen rose red 1472 9-7 47% 16 TX
23754 LAVA West 14-Molten ay 1472 18-28 39% 14 CA
23755 NC GOLD 17-3 1472 11-12 48% 17 NC
23756 OCJ 14-Black 1472 14-10 58% 14 OR
23757 Red Storm 11-S regional 1472 4-7 33% 11 LA
23758 ATN 13-Ohana 1472 21-20 51% 13 CA
23759 949 16-Yellow 1472 5-3 63% 16 CA
23760 JJVA Club 12-C 1472 7-8 47% 12 FL
23761 MV Wildcats 14 1472 0-1 0% 14 IA
23762 MiElite 15-Jacki east 1472 9-9 39% 15 MI
23763 Drive Nation 11-Red 1472 9-31 21% 11 TX
23764 Lancers 16-Scarlet 1472 1-3 25% 16 IA
23765 Dynasty 14-3-stripe 1472 3-4 43% 14 TX
23766 Top Flight 11-Gamma 1472 4-7 36% 11 IL
23767 DE Eagles 10-White 1472 1-1 33% 10 MN
23768 Stingray 14-Blue 1472 6-5 55% 14 CA
23769 Squad VBC Girls 18-Elite 1472 19-31 38% 18 NV
23770 Rockwood 10-Copper 1472 2-2 50% 10 MO
23771 603 United 16-Open 1472 4-5 44% 16 NH
23772 LES 12 Maddy 1472 6-6 43% 12 AL
23773 AP 13-Lite gray 1472 12-6 67% 13 TX
23774 The Shore 13-Black 1472 34-25 58% 13 MI
23775 Premier 14-White 1472 6-6 43% 14 TX
23776 AVBC 13-Red 1472 11-9 55% 13 MI
23777 Sumter VBC 13-Gray 1472 14-11 56% 13 SC
23778 West Point Bluejays 14-Ub 1472 0-1 0% 14 NE
23779 Future Lady Comets 13-1 1472 8-11 33% 13 IA
23780 West Shore YMCA 18-Blue 1472 11-16 41% 18 PA
23781 Crossfire 17-Gold 1472 9-9 50% 17 MN
23782 Wrightvbclub Wright 18 1472 2-2 50% 18 WY
23783 Brownsville Dynamite 15-2 1472 11-14 44% 15 TX
23784 TIV 17-Red 1472 6-9 40% 17 TX
23785 CJVA 15-White 1472 15-22 41% 15 NJ
23786 Epic United 18 Elite 1472 14-19 42% 18 IL
23787 Rhythm 13 Elite 1472 17-23 40% 13 TN
23788 #951 Elite 14-2 1472 8-14 36% 14 CA
23789 Flyers 13-Hfl-kenna 1472 2-3 40% 13 TX
23790 Center Stars 10 1472 6-5 50% 10 WI
23791 Ignite AZ 14-Inferno 1472 32-33 49% 14 AZ
23792 Wisconsin Blaze 12-Black 1472 9-9 50% 12 WI
23793 Radiate 17-Gold a 1472 11-18 38% 17 UT
23794 OK Charge 13-American 1472 25-19 57% 13 OK
23795 Junior Orioles 14 1472 18-21 46% 14 IN
23796 CTX Juniors 13-Blue 1472 13-16 45% 13 TX
23797 JCC JRS 11-S black 1472 1-3 25% 11 MN
23798 CE Lake Charles 14-Red 1472 10-10 50% 14 LA
23799 Spire VC 16 DeGeorge 1472 24-26 48% 16 OH
23800 MVP 11-Blue 1472 15-17 47% 11 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.