Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 459 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22901 East Texas 14-Black 1479 7-5 58% 14 TX
22902 AP 14-Lite atomic 1479 12-8 55% 14 TX
22903 Roots 11-2 blue 1479 15-16 48% 11 TX
22904 MSVB 12-Green 1479 5-7 42% 12 AK
22905 Eclipse 16-1 1479 23-23 50% 16 WA
22906 NITRO 13-White 1479 18-18 50% 13 TX
22907 Team Velocity 14-1 1479 16-15 52% 14 CO
22908 EVA 17-Blue 1479 17-18 49% 17 KY
22909 603 United 12-Seacoast silver 1479 11-9 55% 12 NH
22910 Midwest United 14-Red/blue 1479 9-10 47% 14 MN
22911 BCS Skyline H 13-White 1479 13-11 52% 13 TX
22912 Team Yakima 16-Crest 1479 20-17 54% 16 WA
22913 Aspire NW 14-4 force 1479 16-14 53% 14 OR
22914 Turlock Crush 14-Alexis 1479 11-14 44% 14 CA
22915 Hana Hou 16-1 ward/nate 1479 4-3 57% 16 HI
22916 Creole Big Apple 15-N 1479 16-21 43% 15 NY
22917 RRIV 12-Spring 1479 10-8 43% 12 ND
22918 BRUSA Volleyball Club 17-Jim 1479 12-18 40% 17 CA
22919 La Jolla 17-1 barb 1479 30-25 55% 17 CA
22920 AFVBC 17-Everest 1479 33-28 54% 17 CA
22921 Absolute SubZero BVC 17-Centigrade 1479 4-6 40% 17 WA
22922 STARZ 13-White 1479 26-12 68% 13 IL
22923 Summit Volleyball Club G15-2 1479 2-2 50% 15 MO
22924 BCS Skyline H 16-White 1479 20-19 51% 16 TX
22925 PJVBC 14 Select 1479 18-18 50% 14 WA
22926 Vegas Aces 12-Black 1479 8-10 44% 12 NV
22927 PCVBC 15-Tho 1479 8-7 53% 15 OH
22928 WBVBC 15-2 sarah 1479 18-13 58% 15 OH
22929 EVRC 13-Candice 1479 12-13 48% 13 IN
22930 MOJO Elite 12-White 1479 2-3 40% 12 VA
22931 HOV 15-Red 1479 12-9 57% 15 VA
22932 Diablo VBC 16-1 1479 5-8 38% 16 NV
22933 Emerald Rain 15-Premier 1479 30-30 50% 15 WA
22934 Lancheras Cataño 17 Lancheras Shali Merlo 1479 2-1 67% 17 PR
22935 HN STORM BLUE 16 1479 4-3 50% 16 ND
22936 PO1NT 16-1 premier 1479 5-8 38% 16 OH
22937 JCVC 16-E 1479 15-11 58% 16 TN
22938 Syndicate VC 15-2 1479 10-7 59% 15 CA
22939 Iowa Elite 13-Jenna 1479 4-5 40% 13 IA
22940 Integrity 14-Club blue 1479 13-12 42% 14 TX
22941 Crane 17-1 1479 5-6 45% 17 AZ
22942 Sunshine 15 Valley 1479 21-20 51% 15 CA
22943 SG Elite 15 Thunder 1479 17-24 41% 15 CA
22944 PHOENIX 15-Girls 1479 13-15 46% 15 FL
22945 ESO 13-Grey 1479 2-2 50% 13 OH
22946 Renaissance VBC OVR 13-Black 1479 15-21 42% 13 OH
22947 Kako'o VBA 14 Lynn 1479 11-10 52% 14 HI
22948 CWVC 16-Red 1479 2-3 40% 16 WI
22949 ECC 15-South national 1479 19-21 48% 15 NJ
22950 Mineral Area 12-Impact 1479 9-5 64% 12 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.