Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 458 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22851 MVA 12-Sania-hub 1480 12-8 60% 12 FL
22852 Maroon Belles 13-Vanessa 1480 4-4 50% 13 CO
22853 AVBC 13-R - hickinbotham 1480 8-8 50% 13 OH
22854 Roseville JO 13-1 1480 1-2 33% 13 MN
22855 DIG 18-Blue 1480 11-14 41% 18 TX
22856 Tamales 14-2 1480 2-3 40% 14 MO
22857 Prism 12 Opal 1480 30-23 57% 12 WA
22858 Tstreet 11-Sidney 1480 17-23 43% 11 CA
22859 MOVSelect 14-Black 1480 12-14 46% 14 OH
22860 EVBA 17-Green 1480 5-3 63% 17 MN
22861 Foothills 13-Teal 1480 20-29 41% 13 WA
22862 575 15-Wsr bill 1480 24-17 59% 15 GA
22863 Pitt United 16-Red 1480 29-30 49% 16 PA
22864 Tehachapi 14-Carley 1480 2-5 29% 14 CA
22865 Wolf Pack 12-Black 1479 9-14 28% 12 TX
22866 TAV 13-Blue (MN) 1479 2-5 29% 13 MN
22867 CinciVB Acad 14-2 1479 17-31 35% 14 OH
22868 Club Solano 13-Black 1479 13-22 37% 13 CA
22869 Pgh Elite 15 Silver 1479 13-10 57% 15 PA
22870 Endless Momentum 14-Power blue 1479 2-5 29% 14 MA
22871 FORZA1 13 Elite 1479 15-17 47% 13 CA
22872 shockwave reading 16-1 1479 7-18 28% 16 PA
22873 Strive 16-1 1479 16-14 53% 16 PA
22874 M1 15-Blue 1479 28-36 44% 15 TN
22875 Club One AZ 18-Gold 1479 26-40 39% 18 AZ
22876 Panthers 11 1479 12-7 63% 11 FL
22877 Iowa Rockets Prairie 12-Vbc 1479 3-3 50% 12 IA
22878 Boltz 16-1 1479 8-7 53% 16 AL
22879 NFW Ryze 15 15.1 Premier (NT) 1479 3-4 43% 15 TX
22880 Summit 15-Nat'l green 1479 2-2 40% 15 TX
22881 EVC 18 Elite 1479 23-22 51% 18 IL
22882 Rockhill Blast 15 1479 16-13 55% 15 TX
22883 Westside Girls 13-Green 1479 18-13 58% 13 CA
22884 River City Jrs 12-Gray 1479 1-1 20% 12 IA
22885 FCA Cowlitz 16-Gold 1479 16-16 50% 16 OR
22886 PAVC - NC 17-Onyx 1479 39-23 63% 17 NC
22887 TX Infinity 17-S red 1479 11-13 44% 17 TX
22888 513VB 17-1 1479 21-29 42% 17 OH
22889 Independent 14-Jeff 1479 2-2 50% 14 IN
22890 RC Rage 14-1 jason 1479 8-7 53% 14 NC
22891 Refine 14 Refine - Guyse 1479 9-12 39% 14 AL
22892 Mountain Brook Volleyball Club 14 MBVC Maren and Rachel 1479 11-9 52% 14 AL
22893 SE Grays 13 1479 2-3 40% 13 NE
22894 Metro 15-Purple 1479 8-20 29% 15 DC
22895 913Athletics 13-Black 1479 10-12 45% 13 KS
22896 Bubbles United 18-Gomez 1479 13-12 52% 18 FL
22897 PR Arsenal 16-Bujosa 1479 2-9 18% 16 PR
22898 MoCo Jrs 14-Molten 1479 18-13 53% 14 TX
22899 AJV 14-Cedar park 1479 19-24 44% 14 TX
22900 Mana Toa 17-Olivia 1479 12-15 44% 17 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.