Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 457 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22801 AGILE 14-1 1480 16-9 64% 14 OR
22802 Sky High 17-Crawford 1480 5-7 42% 17 IL
22803 SW Power 12-1 1480 2-4 33% 12 MN
22804 KC Force 15-Teal 1480 3-5 38% 15 MO
22805 Sierra Wave 13-1 1480 9-5 64% 13 CA
22806 TX STORM 16-National 1480 11-23 32% 16 TX
22807 Epic United 14-Prem-2 1480 29-17 63% 14 IL
22808 LRVA 18-Orange 1480 2-3 40% 18
22809 New WAVE 13-Thunder 1480 17-19 47% 13 IL
22810 Red Rock 14-Connie/cooper - campbell 1480 16-17 48% 14 CA
22811 Oly Reign 14-2 1480 3-5 38% 14 WA
22812 Monti Heat 13 1480 4-4 50% 13 IA
22813 Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 17 SWVC GR18-DEWEY 1480 3-9 25% 17 WY
22814 Sunset West 11-Sisters 1480 1-1 25% 11 NE
22815 Grandlake 15-A henschen 1480 3-2 60% 15 OH
22816 307 Impact 13 307 Impact-Kinzee 1480 3-3 50% 13 WY
22817 Club Fusion 14-Spark 1480 6-5 55% 14 IL
22818 TVA Smack 14 Power 1480 9-15 38% 14 CA
22819 AJV 15 Navy 1480 19-26 42% 15 TX
22820 Colstrip 18-1 1480 16-14 47% 18 MT
22821 LVC 12-Purple 1480 0-1 0% 12 NY
22822 Absolute 10-Black 1480 22-24 48% 10 CA
22823 NPJ Seattle 15-Black 1480 31-39 44% 15 WA
22824 Elite Volleyball Black 14 1480 27-31 45% 14 IA
22825 Iowa Heart 14-Black 1480 10-12 42% 14 IA
22826 Stingray 13-Black 1480 17-21 45% 13 CA
22827 AVA TX 14-Select 1480 8-7 53% 14 TX
22828 Tribe 16-Regional blue 1480 24-16 60% 16 FL
22829 FoothillVBC 16-Red 1480 21-27 44% 16 CA
22830 FPVC 16-Ren national 1480 2-3 40% 16 CA
22831 Tempest Volley UEC 15 1480 2-2 50% 15 WY
22832 Shockwave Volleyball Club 15 15U SWVC Nationals (SO) 1480 16-16 47% 15
22833 H Skyline 14-Adidas 1480 8-8 50% 14 TX
22834 Amarillo Xtreme 12 Heat 1480 14-11 56% 12 TX
22835 Tampa North 16-National 1480 27-24 53% 16 FL
22836 NNJ 15-Hannah 1480 23-30 43% 15 NV
22837 SERVE VBC 16-2 1480 3-2 60% 16 OH
22838 OVC 17-1 1480 20-22 48% 17 MO
22839 Effingham Elite Volleyball Club LLC 14-R 1480 11-11 50% 14 GA
22840 MOD Elite 12-Gold 1480 12-18 40% 12 IL
22841 Future 12-Elite 1480 19-16 51% 12 IL
22842 Sherwood Synergy 14 1480 3-1 75% 14 AR
22843 CCVV 16 FUCHSIA 1480 21-23 48% 16 FL
22844 High Line 13-Renegades 1480 17-20 43% 13 PA
22845 Squad 14-Elite 1480 24-33 42% 14 NV
22846 NOVA Juniors 17-S gold 1480 23-27 46% 17 OH
22847 PAO Southside U10/U 11-Rda lal 1480 15-18 45% 11 MO
22848 KPV 13-Pink-hannah 1480 22-27 43% 13 KY
22849 Infinity SP 14-White 1480 14-13 52% 14 WI
22850 674 Manati 15-1 f enger 1480 2-2 50% 15 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.