Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 456 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22751 MVBC 14-Tsunami 1481 26-24 52% 14 VA
22752 Wisconsin Elite 14-Red 1481 33-30 52% 14 WI
22753 ATN 14-Chloe 1481 22-21 51% 14 CA
22754 Winter League 11 1481 2-2 50% 11 IL
22755 ENVOL 11-Nicole 1481 3-3 50% 11 PR
22756 LVA 10-1 1481 3-3 50% 10 PR
22757 LCVC 15-White 1481 8-9 47% 15 IN
22758 Infinity 16-National 1481 22-28 44% 16 CO
22759 Tsunami 17-2e gerre 1481 27-34 44% 17 GA
22760 16U BPR 16-1 1481 3-4 43% 16 NY
22761 Timberwolves Blue 14 1481 4-3 57% 14
22762 SPVC Amberlee 14-2026 1481 10-8 42% 14 UT
22763 Endless 16-Navy john 1481 11-12 42% 16 TX
22764 Southern Alabama Volleyball Academy (SAVA) 17 SAVA - Sevies 1481 11-15 42% 17 AL
22765 Iowa Juniors 11-Red 1481 3-3 38% 11 IA
22766 TW Skyline 17-Black 1481 18-29 38% 17 TX
22767 Hollywood 15-3 inspire american 1481 3-5 38% 15 OH
22768 ZTV 18-1 platinum 1481 10-16 36% 18 MT
22769 Michio Chicago 11-Lions 1480 2-3 40% 11 IL
22770 CUVB 12-Black 1480 13-13 39% 12 TX
22771 No Limits 15 National (TX) 1480 3-5 38% 15 TX
22772 SEC Royal 16 1480 2-1 50% 16
22773 FVA 15-3 1480 26-19 58% 15 MO
22774 LI Knights 17-1 1480 8-6 57% 17 NY
22775 VC United 13-2 premier 1480 12-9 57% 13 IL
22776 Aspire 15 Royal 1480 13-10 57% 15 AZ
22777 SPVA 16-Nova 1480 26-20 57% 16 PA
22778 C2 14-5 regional orange jen 1480 11-9 55% 14 TN
22779 TQ 15 1480 24-20 55% 15 AZ
22780 Masters Volleyball Academy- Carolina's 14-1 1480 13-13 50% 14 SC
22781 Spiketown VBC 10-2 1480 2-2 50% 10 OH
22782 GSL Panther JO VB 10-1 1480 1-1 50% 10 MN
22783 MDJRS 17-Elite yellow 1480 28-26 50% 17 MD
22784 Colorado Crossfire 16-1 1480 47-58 45% 16 CO
22785 Apex VBTC 14-Summit red 1480 3-3 50% 14 OH
22786 CINCY EAST 17-2 blue 1480 5-6 45% 17 OH
22787 TVC 12-A-s 1480 16-22 42% 12 FL
22788 TN Heat 17-1 1480 13-14 48% 17 TN
22789 Jaguars 15-Black 1480 21-18 46% 15 NY
22790 Renaissance 15-Red (KE) 1480 21-25 46% 15 PA
22791 ACT 15-Ethan 1480 20-21 49% 15 CA
22792 HEAT 13-National 1480 12-15 44% 13 OK
22793 Kingdom 13-1 1480 8-9 47% 13 CA
22794 RAGE 17-Jerry 1480 24-25 49% 17 CA
22795 Columbus Classics 13 1480 7-9 44% 13 TX
22796 Iowa Impact 15-3 elite 1480 20-43 32% 15 IA
22797 LIV 14-Royal 1480 2-5 29% 14 CA
22798 AVBC 18-S dieter 1480 15-18 45% 18 OH
22799 ROCK VBC 16-1 1480 15-13 54% 16 WI
22800 SCVB 14-Elin 1480 15-14 52% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.