Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 455 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22701 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 12-1 1481 4-7 24% 12 MO
22702 Cape Cod 16-Derrick 1481 10-8 45% 16 MA
22703 Starling Tucson 14-Red 1481 4-4 50% 14 CA
22704 RZVC 12-1 vicious 1481 9-12 43% 12 TX
22705 SCOTS 16-1 1481 3-1 75% 16 NC
22706 CALI 16-Gold south 1481 15-15 50% 16 NY
22707 ACAD 16-Blue 1481 15-38 28% 16 NY
22708 Cape Fear 14-1 1481 21-24 47% 14 FL
22709 DIGS 12-1 1481 1-2 33% 12 MN
22710 Watertown 12-Blue 1481 1-1 50% 12 MN
22711 Iowa Vortex 15-Genna 1481 5-5 50% 15 IA
22712 DCVC 16 1481 5-3 63% 16 IA
22713 Aces 12-White 1481 3-4 38% 12 ND
22714 MCV 12-Williams 1481 3-3 50% 12 NC
22715 Rapids Volleyball Club 14-S 1481 2-3 40% 14 MN
22716 A-10 Black 16-Girls 1481 72-82 47% 16 PA
22717 ATHENA VB 14-4 black select 1481 19-29 40% 14 OR
22718 Force Volleyball Club 18-1 1481 15-17 47% 18 MS
22719 Midway Elite SS 14-Royal 1481 6-5 55% 14 IL
22720 Cyclones 12-Apollo 1481 16-21 39% 12 IL
22721 RMI 18-1 1481 5-2 71% 18 HI
22722 F5 Sports Complex 16-1 1481 15-10 60% 16 TN
22723 ESVBC 13-Dragons 1481 13-11 54% 13 IA
22724 WI Juniors 11-1 1481 37-58 39% 11 WI
22725 Cruisers 13 1481 1-1 33% 13 IA
22726 Pipeline 15-Ultra jedi 1481 24-27 47% 15 CA
22727 AV IMPACT 14-Luis 1481 18-17 51% 14 CA
22728 RISE 712 14-1 1481 5-6 45% 14 IA
22729 716 United VBC 15 1481 7-11 35% 15 NY
22730 LV Force VB 14-Red 1481 22-33 40% 14 PA
22731 Premier VBC 16-Black 1481 29-32 48% 16 CO
22732 Premier Central IL 2030 14 Premier Central IL 2030 1481 4-5 44% 14
22733 SPVA 14-Comet 1481 24-21 53% 14 PA
22734 MOD Elite 16-Black 1481 33-29 53% 16 IL
22735 Sky High Adidas 16-Silver 1481 28-30 48% 16 IL
22736 CSVC 17-Blue 1481 20-20 50% 17 NC
22737 Crosscourt 12-Purple 1481 9-8 53% 12 PA
22738 Katy United 17 Molten 1481 31-33 48% 17 TX
22739 FVP 16-Regional 1481 26-21 55% 16 WI
22740 Nfinity VBC 15-South bay 1481 31-21 60% 15 CA
22741 LVL 13 LASSEN 1481 19-19 50% 13 LA
22742 Adversity 16-Wht adidas 1481 22-27 45% 16 IL
22743 NWAS Eugene 16-Alpha 1481 23-24 49% 16 OR
22744 Big Cat Volleyball 12-1 1481 3-6 33% 12 IA
22745 AVC CLE 15-Black 1481 11-13 46% 15 OH
22746 Seal Beach Volleyball Club 13-White 1481 14-19 42% 13 CA
22747 Resilient Volleyball Academy 14-Navy 1481 22-16 58% 14 FL
22748 VA APEX 16 1481 24-18 57% 16 VA
22749 CSVB 18-X 1481 13-10 57% 18 MN
22750 Kansas Rise VBC 15-2 1481 8-5 57% 15 KS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.