Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 460 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 15-1 adidas with a 2482 Elo rating and 61-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22951 Momentum Volleyball 10-Shelby 1486 5-7 42% 10 CO
22952 DGF 12-White 1486 1-2 20% 12
22953 Marion Magic 12-Regional 1486 3-4 43% 12 IA
22954 HJVC 14-Red 1486 12-18 34% 14
22955 Starlings 12-S 1486 1-1 25% 12
22956 NT Flyers 16-Usa-rich 1486 13-15 35% 16
22957 HJV 13-Molten 1486 10-12 45% 13 TX
22958 Endless VBC 14-Maroon 1486 3-4 43% 14
22959 Phoenix 13-Pink 1486 5-6 45% 13 AZ
22960 LaVille 14-Blue 1486 2-3 40% 14
22961 Hi-Line Hit 18 1486 10-10 45% 18
22962 IMPACT - 15-2 1486 20-21 44% 15
22963 Garden Oaks Sprouts 11-Black 1486 4-5 44% 11 TX
22964 Saber 11 1486 1-2 33% 11
22965 MWS 13-Black 1486 9-11 45% 13
22966 Sierra Club SVC 15 1486 1-2 33% 15
22967 Milwaukee Jr's 14-Elite 1486 30-38 44% 14 WI
22968 Club 1 14-White 1486 16-16 50% 14 IL
22969 SRVC Hurricanes 12 1486 17-17 43% 12
22970 Niagara Rapids Storm 16 1486 3-4 43% 16
22971 River City Juniors 14-Red 1486 3-4 43% 14
22972 Independent 14-Jariyah 1486 2-2 50% 14
22973 Orange Crush 14-S 1486 2-2 50% 14 OH
22974 PVA 16-Gray 1486 8-10 44% 16 MO
22975 287 SVC 14-Navy 1486 6-3 60% 14
22976 EC Volley 13 1486 2-3 40% 13
22977 AP 16-Wilco yellow 1486 25-24 51% 16 TX
22978 Rise 14-1 1486 34-32 52% 14 CA
22979 603 United 15-Seacoast white 1486 14-19 42% 15 NH
22980 NNJ 15-Lauryn 1486 17-29 37% 15 NV
22981 AVA 13-Premier 3 1486 19-16 54% 13 NY
22982 Cap City 10-State purple 1486 9-6 53% 10 NC
22983 Rockwood 10-Copper 1486 2-2 50% 10 MO
22984 Hammerhead 16-2 1486 18-18 50% 16 MN
22985 VC United W 11-Navy regional 1486 9-8 50% 11 IL
22986 Central VBC 13-1 1486 4-4 50% 13 CA
22987 OK Charge South 15-1 1486 21-18 54% 15 OK
22988 STARZ 13-White 1486 26-12 68% 13 IL
22989 Club Legacy 14-Bravo 1486 13-13 50% 14 NE
22990 RBA 16 Teal 1486 5-4 56% 16 FL
22991 QVA 14-Helium 1486 23-13 64% 14 FL
22992 Texas One 14-Cobalt 1486 12-9 55% 14 TX
22993 Oly Reign 12-Blue 1486 18-11 62% 12 WA
22994 Legacy 15-Select west blu 1486 29-15 66% 15 MI
22995 Falcon Fever 14 1486 5-3 63% 14 MN
22996 575 15-Lpr david 1486 23-17 57% 15 GA
22997 Illini Elite 13-White 1486 9-7 56% 13 IL
22998 A5 Regional 14-1 1486 3-2 60% 14 GA
22999 Aspire 15 Royal 1486 13-10 57% 15 AB
23000 QVA 11-Local 1486 13-9 59% 11 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.