Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 460 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 15-1 adidas with a 2482 Elo rating and 61-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22951 603 United 15-Seacoast white 1486 14-19 42% 15 NH
22952 NNJ 15-Lauryn 1486 17-29 37% 15 NV
22953 Hammerhead 16-2 1486 18-18 50% 16 MN
22954 Rockwood 10-Copper 1486 2-2 50% 10 MO
22955 AVA 13-Premier 3 1486 19-16 54% 13 NY
22956 Cap City 10-State purple 1486 9-6 53% 10 NC
22957 1W 14 Crimson 1486 23-19 55% 14 WI
22958 OK Charge South 15-1 1486 21-18 54% 15 OK
22959 RBA 16 Teal 1486 5-4 56% 16 FL
22960 Texas One 14-Cobalt 1486 12-9 55% 14 TX
22961 Pgh Elite 15 Silver 1486 13-10 57% 15 PA
22962 573 Missouri Juniors 13-1 1486 1-3 25% 13 MO
22963 287 SVC 14-Navy 1486 6-3 60% 14
22964 RIZE 12-Sarah 1486 2-2 50% 12
22965 Everton 15-Feminin blanc 1486 4-3 57% 15
22966 MN Freeze 14-Gray 1486 7-5 58% 14
22967 Central VBC 13-1 1486 4-4 50% 13 CA
22968 8058 Peak VBC 15 1486 6-7 46% 15 CO
22969 KeAloha 15-1 cloudbreak 1486 23-23 50% 15 IN
22970 VC United W 11-Navy regional 1486 9-8 50% 11 IL
22971 TAV Houston 13-Blue 1485 17-34 33% 13 TX
22972 Red Storm 13 Regional 1485 9-10 39% 13 LA
22973 Tstreet IE 13-Tara 1485 17-25 40% 13 CA
22974 417 MoJrs 13-Reg white 1485 7-7 44% 13 MO
22975 ECVC 13-White 1485 13-18 42% 13 VA
22976 SoCal VBC 13-Cardiff 1485 14-19 42% 13 CA
22977 WAVE 14-Tsunami 1485 22-27 45% 14 CA
22978 TVC 12-Royal 1485 10-15 40% 12 OH
22979 Iowa Select 16-Reid 1485 14-17 45% 16 IA
22980 IA Juniors 13-Black 1485 19-23 45% 13 IA
22981 I AM VBC 12-White 1485 17-24 41% 12 WI
22982 Momentum 15-1 1485 2-3 40% 15 CO
22983 Dynasty 14-3-stripe 1485 3-4 43% 14 KS
22984 MHAC 14-Black 1485 17-24 41% 14 OR
22985 CVC 14-Grey 1485 8-11 42% 14 OH
22986 Rhythm 14 DT 1485 22-26 44% 14 TN
22987 Dynamite Adidas 15-2 1485 14-29 33% 15 MI
22988 Empire 17-Jalynn 1485 2-4 33% 17 CA
22989 Synergy 17-Larue 1485 2-3 40% 17 PA
22990 TC ELITE 15-S 1485 9-8 45% 15 LA
22991 VPS 14-1 1485 1-4 20% 14 NY
22992 PO1NT 16-1 premier 1485 5-8 38% 16 PA
22993 ADS Volleyball 16-Elite 1485 9-14 39% 16 TX
22994 New WAVE 14 Hurricane 1485 12-14 46% 14 CA
22995 Chicago Elite 14 Nike 1485 23-26 47% 14 IL
22996 CJV 15-Select white 1485 24-23 51% 15 NC
22997 Inside Out 18-Mizunopurple 1485 23-21 52% 18 MI
22998 MAVA 15-Black 1485 37-30 55% 15 KY
22999 Club Tonka 12-1 1485 9-9 50% 12 MN
23000 WVBA 16-Elite black 1485 21-17 55% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.