2025-2026 Season — Page 460 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 15-1 adidas with a 2482 Elo rating and 61-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22951 | 603 United 15-Seacoast white | 1486 | 14-19 | 42% | 15 | NH |
| 22952 | NNJ 15-Lauryn | 1486 | 17-29 | 37% | 15 | NV |
| 22953 | Hammerhead 16-2 | 1486 | 18-18 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 22954 | Rockwood 10-Copper | 1486 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | MO |
| 22955 | AVA 13-Premier 3 | 1486 | 19-16 | 54% | 13 | NY |
| 22956 | Cap City 10-State purple | 1486 | 9-6 | 53% | 10 | NC |
| 22957 | 1W 14 Crimson | 1486 | 23-19 | 55% | 14 | WI |
| 22958 | OK Charge South 15-1 | 1486 | 21-18 | 54% | 15 | OK |
| 22959 | RBA 16 Teal | 1486 | 5-4 | 56% | 16 | FL |
| 22960 | Texas One 14-Cobalt | 1486 | 12-9 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 22961 | Pgh Elite 15 Silver | 1486 | 13-10 | 57% | 15 | PA |
| 22962 | 573 Missouri Juniors 13-1 | 1486 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | MO |
| 22963 | 287 SVC 14-Navy | 1486 | 6-3 | 60% | 14 | |
| 22964 | RIZE 12-Sarah | 1486 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | |
| 22965 | Everton 15-Feminin blanc | 1486 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | |
| 22966 | MN Freeze 14-Gray | 1486 | 7-5 | 58% | 14 | |
| 22967 | Central VBC 13-1 | 1486 | 4-4 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 22968 | 8058 Peak VBC 15 | 1486 | 6-7 | 46% | 15 | CO |
| 22969 | KeAloha 15-1 cloudbreak | 1486 | 23-23 | 50% | 15 | IN |
| 22970 | VC United W 11-Navy regional | 1486 | 9-8 | 50% | 11 | IL |
| 22971 | TAV Houston 13-Blue | 1485 | 17-34 | 33% | 13 | TX |
| 22972 | Red Storm 13 Regional | 1485 | 9-10 | 39% | 13 | LA |
| 22973 | Tstreet IE 13-Tara | 1485 | 17-25 | 40% | 13 | CA |
| 22974 | 417 MoJrs 13-Reg white | 1485 | 7-7 | 44% | 13 | MO |
| 22975 | ECVC 13-White | 1485 | 13-18 | 42% | 13 | VA |
| 22976 | SoCal VBC 13-Cardiff | 1485 | 14-19 | 42% | 13 | CA |
| 22977 | WAVE 14-Tsunami | 1485 | 22-27 | 45% | 14 | CA |
| 22978 | TVC 12-Royal | 1485 | 10-15 | 40% | 12 | OH |
| 22979 | Iowa Select 16-Reid | 1485 | 14-17 | 45% | 16 | IA |
| 22980 | IA Juniors 13-Black | 1485 | 19-23 | 45% | 13 | IA |
| 22981 | I AM VBC 12-White | 1485 | 17-24 | 41% | 12 | WI |
| 22982 | Momentum 15-1 | 1485 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | CO |
| 22983 | Dynasty 14-3-stripe | 1485 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | KS |
| 22984 | MHAC 14-Black | 1485 | 17-24 | 41% | 14 | OR |
| 22985 | CVC 14-Grey | 1485 | 8-11 | 42% | 14 | OH |
| 22986 | Rhythm 14 DT | 1485 | 22-26 | 44% | 14 | TN |
| 22987 | Dynamite Adidas 15-2 | 1485 | 14-29 | 33% | 15 | MI |
| 22988 | Empire 17-Jalynn | 1485 | 2-4 | 33% | 17 | CA |
| 22989 | Synergy 17-Larue | 1485 | 2-3 | 40% | 17 | PA |
| 22990 | TC ELITE 15-S | 1485 | 9-8 | 45% | 15 | LA |
| 22991 | VPS 14-1 | 1485 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | NY |
| 22992 | PO1NT 16-1 premier | 1485 | 5-8 | 38% | 16 | PA |
| 22993 | ADS Volleyball 16-Elite | 1485 | 9-14 | 39% | 16 | TX |
| 22994 | New WAVE 14 Hurricane | 1485 | 12-14 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 22995 | Chicago Elite 14 Nike | 1485 | 23-26 | 47% | 14 | IL |
| 22996 | CJV 15-Select white | 1485 | 24-23 | 51% | 15 | NC |
| 22997 | Inside Out 18-Mizunopurple | 1485 | 23-21 | 52% | 18 | MI |
| 22998 | MAVA 15-Black | 1485 | 37-30 | 55% | 15 | KY |
| 22999 | Club Tonka 12-1 | 1485 | 9-9 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 23000 | WVBA 16-Elite black | 1485 | 21-17 | 55% | 16 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.