Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 460 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22951 GSA 16-National 1479 33-25 57% 16 NJ
22952 AVA 15-Lightning 1479 15-14 52% 15 MA
22953 Next 13-Silver 1479 5-5 50% 13 OH
22954 Apex VBTC 13-Summit red 1479 2-2 50% 13 OH
22955 Mid-Michigan ACES 15 Avreigh 1479 9-6 60% 15 MI
22956 Upstate Volleyball Club 14 Upstate VBC Travel 1479 8-10 36% 14 NY
22957 SLAM 13-P red 1479 29-21 58% 13 MA
22958 Mizuno CNVBC 17-Salena 1479 12-19 39% 17 MO
22959 Wakulla Aces 17-1 1479 8-7 53% 17 FL
22960 NVA 17-Premier luis 1479 33-25 57% 17 FL
22961 RUSH TUC 15-Black 1479 21-24 47% 15 AZ
22962 New York Elite 18-Black 1479 13-14 48% 18 NY
22963 Augusta Juniors Volleyball Club 14-Jesse 1479 19-14 58% 14 GA
22964 Tsunami 13-1n fay 1479 12-14 46% 13 GA
22965 Rev 12-2 vipers 1479 17-13 57% 12 IN
22966 Champion 13-Z purple 1479 9-14 39% 13 NC
22967 KIVA 12-Blue 1479 27-32 46% 12 KY
22968 Momentum 17-Neon 1479 38-24 61% 17 FL
22969 Zero Gravity 15-Black 1479 2-2 50% 15 OH
22970 OFVA 11-S 1479 2-2 50% 11 OH
22971 Fort McMurray Thunder Volleyball Club 15-Girls 1479 5-3 63% 15
22972 SEC Lady Villians 11 1479 2-2 50% 11
22973 Ducks Volleyball Club 15-3 cayla 1479 2-5 29% 15
22974 Pulse 16-Nicole 1479 3-2 60% 16 MI
22975 W Pride 15-1 1479 3-2 60% 15 NY
22976 Tsunami 15-2e aau malae 1479 6-4 60% 15 GA
22977 Lake Cumberland Splash 17 Lake Cumberland Splash (PR) 1479 9-7 56% 17 KY
22978 SAVA 13-Blue 1479 35-27 56% 13 KY
22979 Prime 14-Regional 1479 10-8 56% 14 CO
22980 TKVBC 13-Mustangs elite 1479 40-39 51% 13 GA
22981 Club V 12-Daisy 1479 11-9 48% 12 UT
22982 Dubuque Blaze 14-Black 1479 7-9 41% 14 IA
22983 FAVA 15 1479 2-3 40% 15 PA
22984 Enid IMPACT 14-Blue 1479 2-3 40% 14 OK
22985 Rising Tide 15-S force 1479 18-34 35% 15 SC
22986 Ohana 13-Baymax 1479 1-2 33% 13 FL
22987 Texas Coastal 13-Maroon 1479 1-2 33% 13 TX
22988 Dig This! VBC 14-Black 1479 12-24 33% 14 NV
22989 South Shore Slam 15-National 1479 2-5 29% 15 WI
22990 AHAVA 11 1478 7-8 44% 11 TN
22991 RSVBC 12-1 1478 25-33 43% 12 WA
22992 P2VA 18-1 1478 10-15 40% 18 PA
22993 SWKS High Performance 13-1 1478 3-4 43% 13 KS
22994 Hayfield 15 1478 3-4 43% 15 MN
22995 OCV 14 1478 3-4 43% 14 OR
22996 Faribault Red 14-1 1478 3-2 60% 14 MN
22997 S STORM 18 1478 10-7 59% 18 MI
22998 Defensa 15-Maddi 1478 4-3 57% 15 ON
22999 SOSVBC 15-T kaitlyn 1478 7-6 54% 15 NY
23000 Spire VC 16 Tome 1478 10-9 53% 16 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.