Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 461 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23001 Abingdon Falcons 12U 1478 10-9 53% 12 VA
23002 LBVC 12-Shanae 1478 10-9 53% 12 CA
23003 Inside Out 18-Mizunopurple 1478 23-21 52% 18 MI
23004 MDJRS 16-Open black 1478 30-24 52% 16 MD
23005 Mizuno M1 15-Blu 1478 31-29 52% 15 MN
23006 Defensa 17 Katherine 1478 8-9 47% 17 ON
23007 M1 12-Silver 1478 12-10 44% 12 TN
23008 Aleta 13-1 1478 5-4 56% 13 OH
23009 Impact 18 1478 0-0 0% 18 MN
23010 ATTACK VOLLEYBALL CLUB 15-1 1478 0-2 0% 15 MI
23011 E SOLID ROCK 14 CARDINAL 1478 7-11 39% 14 TX
23012 FVA 16-Flame - m 1478 6-9 40% 16 AK
23013 K1 Bayamon 18-2 1478 4-10 29% 18 PR
23014 Telluride Volleyball Club 17 Telluride - mixed 1478 4-3 57% 17 CO
23015 CE Jennings 18-Haleigh 1478 7-7 50% 18 LA
23016 Boston United 15-Royal 1478 1-2 33% 15 MA
23017 HYPE 16-2 1478 5-1 83% 16 MS
23018 Vaqueras 13-F keyshla 1478 11-15 42% 13 PR
23019 Madison Ignite 13 Royal 1478 14-14 50% 13 WI
23020 LES 17-Lanice 1478 8-13 36% 17 AL
23021 A-E Edge 15 1478 1-2 33% 15 MN
23022 WF Elite 15-Red 1478 12-8 57% 15 TX
23023 Hunter's Volleyball Academy 14 14U Red C. Kevin 1478 2-2 50% 14 FL
23024 OMNI 14 Prime 1478 27-21 56% 14 CA
23025 YVA 14-B 1478 2-3 40% 14 WY
23026 Nova 18-Premier 1478 2-4 33% 18 CT
23027 Kali 14-F aneshcka 1478 6-5 55% 14 PR
23028 Rocky Elite 13-Black 1478 34-32 52% 13 CO
23029 SVE 13-2 1478 5-9 36% 13 GA
23030 BVC 10-Cubs black 1478 5-5 50% 10 WY
23031 Lynwood Starlings 14-1 1478 15-18 45% 14 CA
23032 ETA1 13-Black 1478 9-11 39% 13 TX
23033 360VBA 15-1 1478 24-19 56% 15 WI
23034 Adrenaline 12 1478 2-5 25% 12 IA
23035 GALVESTON VC 12-Rush 1478 10-11 42% 12 TX
23036 Low Country 15-National 1478 13-28 32% 15 SC
23037 MT NW 12-Nora 1478 9-12 39% 12 MT
23038 FCA Force 11 1478 4-6 40% 11 KY
23039 TC ELITE 16-Lexi 1478 3-5 38% 16 LA
23040 CVC 15-1 (SO) 1478 19-12 59% 15 AL
23041 Titanas 15-3 1478 3-2 60% 15 PR
23042 TEXAS TWISTERS 14-Navy 1478 19-15 54% 14 TX
23043 KC Fire Volleyball 13-1 1478 3-1 75% 13 KS
23044 Destiny 15-Adam 1478 15-15 50% 15 TX
23045 MSSVC 18-Lightning 1478 3-4 43% 18 WV
23046 MGA 14-Gold 1478 23-17 57% 14 MA
23047 Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 12 SWVC RS12-URBIN 1478 4-4 33% 12 WY
23048 Guns Up VBC 14 Plainview 1478 22-20 52% 14 TX
23049 RCVA 17-Girls national 1478 18-26 41% 17 VA
23050 Summit 14-Elite black 1478 9-12 38% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.