Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 461 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 15-1 adidas with a 2489 Elo rating and 61-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23001 AVA 13-Premier 3 1486 19-16 54% 13 NY
23002 TIV 15-Black 1486 6-17 26% 15
23003 USA South 14-Premier blac 1486 8-8 50% 14 FL
23004 Rival 13-Regional black 1486 16-12 57% 13 FL
23005 StriveVBC 15-1 1486 1-5 17% 15
23006 Intensity 17 Eclipse 1486 22-18 55% 17
23007 ECVC 14-National - cabatu 1486 6-13 32% 14 VA
23008 Cascade 17 1486 30-24 56% 17 WA
23009 River City Juniors 14-Red 1486 3-4 43% 14
23010 NU Breed 18 1486 8-8 50% 18
23011 BRUSA 13 Courtney 1486 20-20 50% 13 CA
23012 LAVA SS 11-Premier 1486 12-16 43% 11
23013 WVBA 16-Elite black 1486 21-17 55% 16 FL
23014 VC United W 11-Navy regional 1486 9-8 50% 11 IL
23015 Independent 14-Jariyah 1486 2-2 50% 14
23016 Stockdale RVC 14-Adidas 1486 25-31 45% 14 TX
23017 Crossfire 12-Gold 1486 5-5 50% 12 WI
23018 Starlings 12-S 1486 1-1 25% 12
23019 Saber 11 1486 1-2 33% 11
23020 LVA 15-National red 1486 16-18 43% 15 TX
23021 ESO 16-Select 1486 6-5 55% 16
23022 Atomic! 13 Ellie 1486 3-3 33% 13 MI
23023 MHE 16-Green 1486 5-5 50% 16
23024 Aspire 15 Royal 1486 13-10 57% 15 AB
23025 Stingray 13-Blue 1486 4-3 57% 13 CA
23026 ARVC 13-Teal adidas 1486 22-24 45% 13 NM
23027 MN Freeze 14-Gray 1486 7-5 58% 14
23028 Niagara Rapids Storm 16 1486 3-4 43% 16
23029 NT Flyers 16-Usa-rich 1486 13-15 35% 16
23030 DGF 12-White 1486 1-2 20% 12
23031 Southernmost 15 1486 6-3 67% 15
23032 TC ELITE 13 JON 1486 11-9 55% 13 LA
23033 FWFIRE 13-W 1486 10-11 38% 13
23034 IMPACT - 15-2 1486 20-21 44% 15
23035 Alpha 12-1 1486 24-25 49% 12
23036 603 United 15-Seacoast white 1486 14-19 42% 15 NH
23037 AVC CLE 13-Silver 1486 5-5 50% 13 OH
23038 EC Volley 13 1486 2-3 40% 13
23039 Club 1 14-White 1486 16-16 50% 14 IL
23040 Orange Crush 14-S 1486 2-2 50% 14 OH
23041 Rise 17-National 1486 35-44 44% 17 CA
23042 Endless 16-Navy john 1486 11-12 42% 16
23043 LHV Girls 13-2 novas 1486 15-16 48% 13 MA
23044 Jax Skyline 16-White 1486 25-23 52% 16 FL
23045 STRIVE 13-Blue 1486 8-9 47% 13 MD
23046 IA Juniors 13-Black 1486 19-23 45% 13 IA
23047 Vegas Aces 12-Black 1486 12-11 52% 12 NV
23048 Illini Elite 13-White 1486 9-7 56% 13 IL
23049 VCN 12-White 1486 6-2 75% 12 NE
23050 WENTZVILLE HEAT 16-1 navy 1486 12-12 43% 16 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.