2025-2026 Season — Page 461 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23001 | Abingdon Falcons 12U | 1478 | 10-9 | 53% | 12 | VA |
| 23002 | LBVC 12-Shanae | 1478 | 10-9 | 53% | 12 | CA |
| 23003 | Inside Out 18-Mizunopurple | 1478 | 23-21 | 52% | 18 | MI |
| 23004 | MDJRS 16-Open black | 1478 | 30-24 | 52% | 16 | MD |
| 23005 | Mizuno M1 15-Blu | 1478 | 31-29 | 52% | 15 | MN |
| 23006 | Defensa 17 Katherine | 1478 | 8-9 | 47% | 17 | ON |
| 23007 | M1 12-Silver | 1478 | 12-10 | 44% | 12 | TN |
| 23008 | Aleta 13-1 | 1478 | 5-4 | 56% | 13 | OH |
| 23009 | Impact 18 | 1478 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | MN |
| 23010 | ATTACK VOLLEYBALL CLUB 15-1 | 1478 | 0-2 | 0% | 15 | MI |
| 23011 | E SOLID ROCK 14 CARDINAL | 1478 | 7-11 | 39% | 14 | TX |
| 23012 | FVA 16-Flame - m | 1478 | 6-9 | 40% | 16 | AK |
| 23013 | K1 Bayamon 18-2 | 1478 | 4-10 | 29% | 18 | PR |
| 23014 | Telluride Volleyball Club 17 Telluride - mixed | 1478 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | CO |
| 23015 | CE Jennings 18-Haleigh | 1478 | 7-7 | 50% | 18 | LA |
| 23016 | Boston United 15-Royal | 1478 | 1-2 | 33% | 15 | MA |
| 23017 | HYPE 16-2 | 1478 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | MS |
| 23018 | Vaqueras 13-F keyshla | 1478 | 11-15 | 42% | 13 | PR |
| 23019 | Madison Ignite 13 Royal | 1478 | 14-14 | 50% | 13 | WI |
| 23020 | LES 17-Lanice | 1478 | 8-13 | 36% | 17 | AL |
| 23021 | A-E Edge 15 | 1478 | 1-2 | 33% | 15 | MN |
| 23022 | WF Elite 15-Red | 1478 | 12-8 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 23023 | Hunter's Volleyball Academy 14 14U Red C. Kevin | 1478 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | FL |
| 23024 | OMNI 14 Prime | 1478 | 27-21 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 23025 | YVA 14-B | 1478 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | WY |
| 23026 | Nova 18-Premier | 1478 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | CT |
| 23027 | Kali 14-F aneshcka | 1478 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | PR |
| 23028 | Rocky Elite 13-Black | 1478 | 34-32 | 52% | 13 | CO |
| 23029 | SVE 13-2 | 1478 | 5-9 | 36% | 13 | GA |
| 23030 | BVC 10-Cubs black | 1478 | 5-5 | 50% | 10 | WY |
| 23031 | Lynwood Starlings 14-1 | 1478 | 15-18 | 45% | 14 | CA |
| 23032 | ETA1 13-Black | 1478 | 9-11 | 39% | 13 | TX |
| 23033 | 360VBA 15-1 | 1478 | 24-19 | 56% | 15 | WI |
| 23034 | Adrenaline 12 | 1478 | 2-5 | 25% | 12 | IA |
| 23035 | GALVESTON VC 12-Rush | 1478 | 10-11 | 42% | 12 | TX |
| 23036 | Low Country 15-National | 1478 | 13-28 | 32% | 15 | SC |
| 23037 | MT NW 12-Nora | 1478 | 9-12 | 39% | 12 | MT |
| 23038 | FCA Force 11 | 1478 | 4-6 | 40% | 11 | KY |
| 23039 | TC ELITE 16-Lexi | 1478 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | LA |
| 23040 | CVC 15-1 (SO) | 1478 | 19-12 | 59% | 15 | AL |
| 23041 | Titanas 15-3 | 1478 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | PR |
| 23042 | TEXAS TWISTERS 14-Navy | 1478 | 19-15 | 54% | 14 | TX |
| 23043 | KC Fire Volleyball 13-1 | 1478 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | KS |
| 23044 | Destiny 15-Adam | 1478 | 15-15 | 50% | 15 | TX |
| 23045 | MSSVC 18-Lightning | 1478 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | WV |
| 23046 | MGA 14-Gold | 1478 | 23-17 | 57% | 14 | MA |
| 23047 | Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 12 SWVC RS12-URBIN | 1478 | 4-4 | 33% | 12 | WY |
| 23048 | Guns Up VBC 14 Plainview | 1478 | 22-20 | 52% | 14 | TX |
| 23049 | RCVA 17-Girls national | 1478 | 18-26 | 41% | 17 | VA |
| 23050 | Summit 14-Elite black | 1478 | 9-12 | 38% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.