Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 462 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 15-1 adidas with a 2489 Elo rating and 61-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23051 GSA 12-Markaija 1486 4-8 33% 12 CA
23052 STRIVE 13-Blue 1486 8-9 47% 13 MD
23053 Vibe 14-Jaguars 1486 17-17 50% 14 CA
23054 TIV 15-Black 1486 6-17 26% 15
23055 Hive 15-Black 1486 19-27 41% 15 UT
23056 StriveVBC 15-1 1486 1-5 17% 15
23057 NCVC 14-Mizuno 1486 10-22 31% 14 CA
23058 VCN 12-White 1486 6-2 75% 12 NE
23059 Tenacity 12-2 1486 2-2 40% 12 TN
23060 CRU Performance 15 1486 12-18 40% 15
23061 Intensity 17 Eclipse 1486 22-18 55% 17
23062 Momentum Volleyball 10-Shelby 1486 5-7 42% 10 CO
23063 Maui Encore 18-S 1486 8-8 50% 18 HI
23064 Allons 13-Kylie 1486 18-13 55% 13 LA
23065 KKVC 14-Sc - blue 1486 1-2 25% 14
23066 NU Breed 18 1486 8-8 50% 18
23067 HOVA 13-A red elite 1486 13-14 48% 13 OH
23068 VC United W 11-Navy regional 1486 9-8 50% 11 IL
23069 Hammerhead 16-2 1486 18-18 50% 16 MN
23070 Sierra Club SVC 15 1486 1-2 33% 15
23071 LVA 15-National red 1486 16-18 43% 15 TX
23072 VIPER 16-Elite 1486 18-21 46% 16 CA
23073 Cap City 10-State purple 1486 9-6 53% 10 NC
23074 Mo Mighty Piranhas 14-1 1486 12-4 71% 14 MO
23075 MWS 13-Black 1486 9-11 45% 13
23076 AVC CLE 13-Silver 1486 5-5 50% 13 OH
23077 RVC VYVL 16-Lee 1486 3-2 60% 16
23078 NEVA 12-Grace 1486 8-8 50% 12 UT
23079 JJVA Club 13-F 1486 7-8 47% 13 FL
23080 EVRC 14-Reese 1486 12-10 55% 14 IN
23081 A5 Regional 14-1 1486 3-2 60% 14 GA
23082 Texas One 14-Cobalt 1486 12-9 55% 14 TX
23083 Actsports 14-Ruiz/mcdonald 1486 8-6 50% 14 VA
23084 MHE 16-Green 1486 5-5 50% 16
23085 NT Flyers 16-Usa-rich 1486 13-15 35% 16
23086 Sol Taino 14-8 1486 2-2 50% 14
23087 LaVille 14-Blue 1486 2-3 40% 14
23088 Dynamite Adidas 15-2 1486 14-29 33% 15 MI
23089 Stingray 13-Blue 1486 4-3 57% 13 CA
23090 K1 Bayamon Carlos 16-20 1485 4-2 67% 16
23091 JCHB 13-1 1485 13-13 50% 13
23092 OK Charge South 15-1 1485 21-18 54% 15 OK
23093 AVA 15-1 1485 3-2 60% 15 OH
23094 SSWolfpack 16-Greywolves 1485 10-7 48% 16
23095 Dynasty 14-3-stripe 1485 3-4 43% 14 KS
23096 Madras Volleyball Club 12-S 1485 5-3 63% 12
23097 SJVC 14-Blue 1485 2-4 33% 14 FL
23098 Kids America 12-Webb 1485 9-8 53% 12
23099 I AM VBC 12-White 1485 17-24 41% 12 WI
23100 IconVBC 16-Elite jen 1485 16-18 47% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.