Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 462 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
23051 Club Four 13-Select 1478 13-14 46% 13 MO
23052 Houston Stars 14-1 1478 2-6 25% 14 TX
23053 NMB 13-Blue christian 1478 19-15 56% 13 FL
23054 FVBC 16-Regional red 1478 18-14 49% 16 MD
23055 Saddleback Valley Volleyball Club 13-Ralph 1478 26-25 51% 13 CA
23056 NPSC United Panthers 14-1 1478 13-18 41% 14 VA
23057 The Edge 16 Silver 1478 26-17 60% 16 CO
23058 City Beach 13-Sara 1478 2-3 40% 13 CA
23059 CI ELITE 16 NAVY 1478 25-16 61% 16 IL
23060 Aleta 17-3 1478 12-9 57% 17 OH
23061 CE Lake Charles 18-Red 1478 18-12 60% 18 LA
23062 KC Dominance 15-2 1478 3-1 60% 15
23063 SoCal Legends Volleyball Club 13-Black 1478 14-13 52% 13 CA
23064 BBVCL 15-Megan 1478 11-9 55% 15 NV
23065 Chaos Volleyball 14 14U Chaos 1478 11-12 48% 14 ND
23066 ULTRA VB 15-Teal 1478 3-3 50% 15 NV
23067 CWAVE Fralick- Bees 11 1478 2-3 40% 11 OH
23068 SEIVB 16-Ertel 1478 10-7 59% 16 IN
23069 Gators VBC 14 Elite 1478 20-20 50% 14 OH
23070 PowerPlex Iowa Heart 17-Black 1478 2-3 40% 17 IA
23071 Vaqueras 12-F luis rivera 1478 5-5 50% 12 PR
23072 MVP 18-Green 1478 7-5 58% 18 OH
23073 MWM 14 1478 7-9 44% 14 IL
23074 PVA 14 FREEDOM 1478 28-26 50% 14 PA
23075 Premier Volleyball 16 Premier Phoenix 1478 26-21 55% 16 DE
23076 CJVA 12-Red 1478 12-14 46% 12 NJ
23077 KIVA McKune 12-1 1478 5-5 50% 12 KY
23078 Panthers 16 1478 35-20 64% 16 FL
23079 Southern Lights 18-S 1478 2-2 50% 18 SD
23080 ArJrs 11-Regional 1478 16-15 50% 11 AR
23081 Top Select 15-Select 1478 37-31 54% 15 FL
23082 Dunes 13-Teal 1478 36-22 62% 13 IN
23083 NKYVC 16-4 thunder 1478 19-18 51% 16 KY
23084 San Gabriel Elite Volleyball Club 12-Elite 1478 11-15 42% 12 CA
23085 FPVC 12-Jason 1478 3-3 50% 12 CA
23086 PSVBA 15-Legacy 1478 15-40 27% 15 WA
23087 Madison Ignite 12 Royal 1478 8-11 42% 12 WI
23088 GC Elite 12U 1478 4-4 50% 12 WI
23089 GVC 15-2 1478 20-17 54% 15 CT
23090 Aftershock 12-Tim 1478 12-11 50% 12 CA
23091 NPJO 12-Red 1478 6-6 50% 12 MN
23092 #951 Elite 18-1 1478 21-23 48% 18 CA
23093 Club Fusion 13-Phoenix spring 1478 6-5 46% 13 IL
23094 AMBITION 17-1 prime 1478 13-16 45% 17 WA
23095 TXP 15-Black danika 1478 15-20 41% 15 TX
23096 Blazerz 15-Black 1478 9-15 38% 15 NY
23097 Apex VBC - Decatur 13 1478 1-2 33% 13 IL
23098 Y Not 14-1 1478 13-11 54% 14 VA
23099 Crusader Juniors 14-1 1478 3-1 75% 14 MN
23100 HOVA 13-A red elite 1478 13-14 48% 13 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.