2025-2026 Season — Page 463 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23101 | Max Performance 16-Bueno | 1478 | 10-8 | 45% | 16 | MA |
| 23102 | KVA 12-Kasey | 1478 | 1-1 | 33% | 12 | HI |
| 23103 | VFVBC 17-1 | 1478 | 12-9 | 52% | 17 | VT |
| 23104 | Club South 11-1 | 1477 | 7-8 | 47% | 11 | TX |
| 23105 | Slainte 11-Black | 1477 | 25-21 | 54% | 11 | CA |
| 23106 | Vital 15-3 white | 1477 | 40-38 | 51% | 15 | MN |
| 23107 | MFVB+ 12 | 1477 | 10-6 | 63% | 12 | IL |
| 23108 | Panther Girls 15-Black | 1477 | 22-25 | 47% | 15 | CO |
| 23109 | Storm 15-Black | 1477 | 45-37 | 54% | 15 | CO |
| 23110 | TPV 12-Navy | 1477 | 18-18 | 50% | 12 | TN |
| 23111 | Mt. Hood 13-3 zigzag | 1477 | 16-18 | 47% | 13 | OR |
| 23112 | Utah Ice 15 Utah Ice Brad (IM) | 1477 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | UT |
| 23113 | Synergy 15 Zinc | 1477 | 27-31 | 47% | 15 | PA |
| 23114 | LIV 14-Reg brooklyn | 1477 | 6-7 | 46% | 14 | LA |
| 23115 | Capitanas 12-Edgardo | 1477 | 7-6 | 54% | 12 | PR |
| 23116 | CSF 17-Legacy | 1477 | 19-25 | 43% | 17 | NC |
| 23117 | Colorado Roughriders 16-Black | 1477 | 19-16 | 54% | 16 | CO |
| 23118 | SA Force 17 Select | 1477 | 25-19 | 57% | 17 | TX |
| 23119 | TPV 15-Paragon | 1477 | 30-28 | 52% | 15 | TN |
| 23120 | The Academy Volleyball Club 14-1 branch | 1477 | 1-3 | 25% | 14 | IN |
| 23121 | Sky Spikers 16-1 | 1477 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | PR |
| 23122 | Tulsa Power 12-2 | 1477 | 20-22 | 48% | 12 | OK |
| 23123 | Momentum Volleyball 17-Celeste | 1477 | 20-26 | 43% | 17 | CO |
| 23124 | A5 Regional 12-Hailey | 1477 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | GA |
| 23125 | North Shore Raiders 16-1 | 1477 | 18-20 | 47% | 16 | HI |
| 23126 | SOVC Atchison 15-A | 1477 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | OH |
| 23127 | EC Power DTOWN 14-Blue | 1477 | 15-27 | 36% | 14 | PA |
| 23128 | TNT 14-Zeppelin | 1477 | 17-16 | 52% | 14 | PA |
| 23129 | Fearless 14-Black | 1477 | 9-9 | 41% | 14 | IA |
| 23130 | Hive 13-Gold | 1477 | 8-23 | 24% | 13 | UT |
| 23131 | Kahunga 13 | 1477 | 12-15 | 36% | 13 | UT |
| 23132 | RockCity 13-R2 | 1477 | 3-6 | 33% | 13 | OH |
| 23133 | Elite Juniors 13-1 | 1477 | 5-4 | 56% | 13 | OH |
| 23134 | Rise 16-N | 1477 | 40-37 | 51% | 16 | AZ |
| 23135 | STRIKE 16-White | 1477 | 39-33 | 53% | 16 | AZ |
| 23136 | Kings County KCV 15-1 | 1477 | 14-13 | 52% | 15 | CA |
| 23137 | PacWest 15-Becca | 1477 | 17-23 | 43% | 15 | CA |
| 23138 | EVOLUTION RED 13 | 1477 | 3-3 | 43% | 13 | IA |
| 23139 | North Point 16-K | 1477 | 10-14 | 38% | 16 | TX |
| 23140 | Infinity 13-Blue | 1477 | 12-14 | 46% | 13 | WI |
| 23141 | WDVB Rally Cats 11-1 | 1477 | 2-3 | 40% | 11 | IA |
| 23142 | Direction 12 Royal | 1477 | 11-11 | 50% | 12 | NC |
| 23143 | Drive Nation 16-Black | 1477 | 5-17 | 23% | 16 | TX |
| 23144 | NT Flyers 16-Usa-rich | 1477 | 13-15 | 35% | 16 | TX |
| 23145 | Mid-Michigan ACES 16 Laura | 1477 | 8-8 | 50% | 16 | MI |
| 23146 | Mintonette Sports 16-5 | 1477 | 22-18 | 55% | 16 | OH |
| 23147 | Rogue 16-Go | 1477 | 39-35 | 53% | 16 | OH |
| 23148 | PCVBC 17 Chaney | 1477 | 10-9 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 23149 | Pink Panthers 14 16 | 1477 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | WY |
| 23150 | Xcel 16-Elite red | 1477 | 26-29 | 46% | 16 | NC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.