2025-2026 Season — Page 441 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22001 | Rock Ridge 12-2 | 1487 | 5-3 | 63% | 12 | MN |
| 22002 | Quantum Volleyball Acadmey 13 13 Hydrogen (FL) | 1487 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | FL |
| 22003 | Roseville Juniors 12-1 | 1487 | 1-1 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 22004 | SURGE 16-Green | 1487 | 20-22 | 48% | 16 | RI |
| 22005 | ForceVC 11-2 | 1487 | 6-5 | 55% | 11 | OH |
| 22006 | DN 11-Red | 1487 | 1-3 | 25% | 11 | TX |
| 22007 | Country Kids 10-S | 1487 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | HI |
| 22008 | Champion 14-R black | 1487 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | NC |
| 22009 | Bridger 16-1 | 1487 | 13-7 | 46% | 16 | MT |
| 22010 | Ignite Volleyball Club 15 14U Taylor | 1487 | 3-3 | 50% | 15 | UT |
| 22011 | CJV 15-Select white | 1487 | 17-20 | 46% | 15 | NC |
| 22012 | Ark Jrs 12-Regional plus black | 1487 | 11-12 | 48% | 12 | AR |
| 22013 | Boise Ignite VBC 16-National | 1487 | 5-8 | 38% | 16 | ID |
| 22014 | TAVA 16-U maelo | 1487 | 5-5 | 50% | 16 | PR |
| 22015 | Genesis 13-Blue | 1487 | 15-15 | 50% | 13 | TN |
| 22016 | Mater Dei Jr Cats 13-Martin | 1487 | 13-10 | 57% | 13 | IN |
| 22017 | Allegheny Volleyball Club 13-Black | 1487 | 11-12 | 41% | 13 | PA |
| 22018 | IA Juniors 17-Red | 1487 | 17-22 | 44% | 17 | IA |
| 22019 | TAV South 17-Royal | 1487 | 14-20 | 38% | 17 | TX |
| 22020 | OK Premier 17 Diamonds | 1487 | 25-19 | 57% | 17 | OK |
| 22021 | ESVBC 13-Raptors local | 1487 | 15-12 | 56% | 13 | IA |
| 22022 | HOS 15-Orange | 1487 | 17-21 | 45% | 15 | NY |
| 22023 | HEVC 11-Halie | 1487 | 10-8 | 56% | 11 | FL |
| 22024 | Grandlake 15-Homan | 1487 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 22025 | NU Breed 18 | 1487 | 8-8 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 22026 | Sharks 15-Benitez | 1487 | 14-11 | 56% | 15 | CO |
| 22027 | Tropical Touch 17-Mata'ala | 1487 | 20-23 | 47% | 17 | CA |
| 22028 | Starling South Central Los Angeles 18 Starling SCLA Ron | 1487 | 11-4 | 73% | 18 | CA |
| 22029 | VEVA Impact 15-Orange | 1487 | 67-114 | 37% | 15 | PA |
| 22030 | Roseville Juniors 13-1 | 1487 | 3-3 | 50% | 13 | MN |
| 22031 | Valley Juniors 13-Black | 1487 | 15-21 | 42% | 13 | VA |
| 22032 | Latitude 41 Volleyball Club 14 14 Silver (OV) | 1487 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | OH |
| 22033 | NC Coastal 16-Brett | 1487 | 27-37 | 42% | 16 | NC |
| 22034 | Galena Rebels 10 | 1487 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | IA |
| 22035 | HEAT 12-Elite | 1487 | 34-20 | 63% | 12 | FL |
| 22036 | Elevation Elite VBC 18-1 | 1487 | 22-13 | 63% | 18 | CA |
| 22037 | PAVC - NC 18-Onyx | 1487 | 25-14 | 64% | 18 | NC |
| 22038 | Eclipse 17-1 (CH) | 1487 | 27-31 | 36% | 17 | CA |
| 22039 | GO Volley 18-N | 1487 | 4-6 | 40% | 18 | VA |
| 22040 | High Voltage 10-1 | 1487 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | MN |
| 22041 | GOVC Sprouts 10 | 1487 | 1-1 | 33% | 10 | TX |
| 22042 | Elevate Volleyball Club 14-Blue | 1487 | 8-6 | 57% | 14 | IL |
| 22043 | White Cross Elite 12 | 1487 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | NC |
| 22044 | LGSVA 12 | 1487 | 12-14 | 46% | 12 | CA |
| 22045 | CVH SELECT 17-2 | 1487 | 7-6 | 54% | 17 | PR |
| 22046 | ECVBA 14-Kayli | 1487 | 11-17 | 39% | 14 | CA |
| 22047 | Delaware Juniors 16-2 | 1487 | 15-14 | 50% | 16 | PA |
| 22048 | WACO VBC 12-Ua red | 1487 | 19-21 | 43% | 12 | TX |
| 22049 | TX LEGACY 12-PURPLE | 1487 | 4-6 | 31% | 12 | TX |
| 22050 | Bremen 14-Mason | 1487 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.