Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 441 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22001 Rock Ridge 12-2 1487 5-3 63% 12 MN
22002 Quantum Volleyball Acadmey 13 13 Hydrogen (FL) 1487 1-3 25% 13 FL
22003 Roseville Juniors 12-1 1487 1-1 50% 12 MN
22004 SURGE 16-Green 1487 20-22 48% 16 RI
22005 ForceVC 11-2 1487 6-5 55% 11 OH
22006 DN 11-Red 1487 1-3 25% 11 TX
22007 Country Kids 10-S 1487 2-2 50% 10 HI
22008 Champion 14-R black 1487 3-3 50% 14 NC
22009 Bridger 16-1 1487 13-7 46% 16 MT
22010 Ignite Volleyball Club 15 14U Taylor 1487 3-3 50% 15 UT
22011 CJV 15-Select white 1487 17-20 46% 15 NC
22012 Ark Jrs 12-Regional plus black 1487 11-12 48% 12 AR
22013 Boise Ignite VBC 16-National 1487 5-8 38% 16 ID
22014 TAVA 16-U maelo 1487 5-5 50% 16 PR
22015 Genesis 13-Blue 1487 15-15 50% 13 TN
22016 Mater Dei Jr Cats 13-Martin 1487 13-10 57% 13 IN
22017 Allegheny Volleyball Club 13-Black 1487 11-12 41% 13 PA
22018 IA Juniors 17-Red 1487 17-22 44% 17 IA
22019 TAV South 17-Royal 1487 14-20 38% 17 TX
22020 OK Premier 17 Diamonds 1487 25-19 57% 17 OK
22021 ESVBC 13-Raptors local 1487 15-12 56% 13 IA
22022 HOS 15-Orange 1487 17-21 45% 15 NY
22023 HEVC 11-Halie 1487 10-8 56% 11 FL
22024 Grandlake 15-Homan 1487 4-2 67% 15 OH
22025 NU Breed 18 1487 8-8 50% 18 CA
22026 Sharks 15-Benitez 1487 14-11 56% 15 CO
22027 Tropical Touch 17-Mata'ala 1487 20-23 47% 17 CA
22028 Starling South Central Los Angeles 18 Starling SCLA Ron 1487 11-4 73% 18 CA
22029 VEVA Impact 15-Orange 1487 67-114 37% 15 PA
22030 Roseville Juniors 13-1 1487 3-3 50% 13 MN
22031 Valley Juniors 13-Black 1487 15-21 42% 13 VA
22032 Latitude 41 Volleyball Club 14 14 Silver (OV) 1487 3-3 50% 14 OH
22033 NC Coastal 16-Brett 1487 27-37 42% 16 NC
22034 Galena Rebels 10 1487 2-2 50% 10 IA
22035 HEAT 12-Elite 1487 34-20 63% 12 FL
22036 Elevation Elite VBC 18-1 1487 22-13 63% 18 CA
22037 PAVC - NC 18-Onyx 1487 25-14 64% 18 NC
22038 Eclipse 17-1 (CH) 1487 27-31 36% 17 CA
22039 GO Volley 18-N 1487 4-6 40% 18 VA
22040 High Voltage 10-1 1487 2-2 50% 10 MN
22041 GOVC Sprouts 10 1487 1-1 33% 10 TX
22042 Elevate Volleyball Club 14-Blue 1487 8-6 57% 14 IL
22043 White Cross Elite 12 1487 2-3 40% 12 NC
22044 LGSVA 12 1487 12-14 46% 12 CA
22045 CVH SELECT 17-2 1487 7-6 54% 17 PR
22046 ECVBA 14-Kayli 1487 11-17 39% 14 CA
22047 Delaware Juniors 16-2 1487 15-14 50% 16 PA
22048 WACO VBC 12-Ua red 1487 19-21 43% 12 TX
22049 TX LEGACY 12-PURPLE 1487 4-6 31% 12 TX
22050 Bremen 14-Mason 1487 2-2 50% 14 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.