Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 442 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
22051 MVP 17-Titanium 1487 12-14 46% 17 OH
22052 Nova 15-Premier kim 1487 12-16 43% 15 CT
22053 NP Dragons 13 Kaelyn 1487 2-2 50% 13 IN
22054 Rice City 13-Blue 1487 14-14 50% 13 LA
22055 CSA 15-Silver 1487 3-4 43% 15 NV
22056 SG Elite 14-Rain ray 1487 10-10 50% 14 CA
22057 RVA 11-Mixed 1487 1-2 25% 11 MD
22058 Independent 14-Brison 1487 2-2 50% 14 IN
22059 APEX1 14-White 1487 13-17 43% 14 CA
22060 Max Apex Elite VBC 13 MA ELITE Lightning (GW) 1487 1-2 25% 13 MO
22061 TVC 15-White 1487 15-14 52% 15 VA
22062 Rancho 15 Silver 1487 30-21 59% 15 CA
22063 Club GSL 15-Elect - cache 1487 30-31 49% 15 UT
22064 VC United 13-2 elite 1487 10-11 48% 13 IL
22065 Falcon Fever 17 1487 6-4 60% 17 MN
22066 ECVC 15-Regional pc - cheyenne 1487 17-16 52% 15 AL
22067 H Skyline 13-Adidas 1487 9-6 56% 13 TX
22068 RUV 16-Blue 1487 4-4 50% 16 GA
22069 Rev 15-Blue 1487 20-18 53% 15 IL
22070 MN North 14-2 black 1487 25-24 51% 14 MN
22071 Na Koa VBC 16 1487 6-6 50% 16 HI
22072 Rival 14-Regional black 1487 16-12 57% 14 FL
22073 MCE 15-1 1487 9-7 56% 15 MN
22074 A-E Edge 14 1487 2-2 40% 14 MN
22075 SPIRIT VBC 12-2 1487 16-15 52% 12 OH
22076 DIG 14-White 1487 6-7 40% 14 TX
22077 MVC 17-1 1487 14-16 47% 17 OH
22078 Eclipse 16-1 (CH) 1487 17-27 39% 16 MD
22079 Vision 14-Reg'l blue 1487 2-2 50% 14 CA
22080 TAV 11-Blue 1487 13-20 37% 11 TX
22081 Mana Toa 17-Mo 1487 5-8 38% 17 AL
22082 COVC 14 Nationals 1487 3-2 60% 14 OR
22083 ProPlay 13 Sara 1487 24-24 50% 13 CA
22084 FORZA1 17-National 1487 28-25 53% 17 CA
22085 Empire 18-1 1487 5-5 50% 18 KS
22086 Atomic! 14-Shannon 1487 1-1 25% 14 MI
22087 26 NU Breed 16-G 1487 4-3 57% 16 CA
22088 Titanium 18 Silver 1487 22-21 49% 18 MO
22089 Aura 16 1487 19-11 63% 16 CA
22090 Mets 15-2 agneris 1487 6-6 50% 15 PR
22091 Hardin Volleydogs 14-1 1487 7-18 28% 14 MT
22092 ENVY 17-Tsunami 1487 28-21 57% 17 RI
22093 Slam VBC 13-Gold 1487 5-5 50% 13 WI
22094 Queen 13 1487 10-10 50% 13 WI
22095 BVC 11 Drennan 1487 5-9 31% 11 AL
22096 Salt City Boys 12-Salty mondo 1487 1-6 14% 12 UT
22097 YAVBC 17 1487 2-2 50% 17 SD
22098 Team Momentum 15-Org 1487 26-19 58% 15 MO
22099 Eclipse 17 1487 13-10 57% 17 MD
22100 TNT 17 Heartbreakers 1487 18-28 39% 17 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.