Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 440 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21951 SCP 12-Sidney 1488 13-11 54% 12 SC
21952 Eclipse 14-S orange 1488 6-11 35% 14 WY
21953 CI Spikers 12-1 1488 6-7 46% 12 MN
21954 Mountain1 14-1 kirsten 1488 6-25 18% 14 MT
21955 Starlings S-N-P 12-Coach sophia 1488 9-5 64% 12 CA
21956 Mni-Hota Elite 13 MHE Black (NO) (12) 1488 3-5 38% 13 ND
21957 FTL 13-Fusion usa-liberty daniel 1488 2-4 33% 13 FL
21958 United 15-White 1488 15-15 50% 15 AL
21959 Next 16-White 1488 16-16 50% 16 OH
21960 Academy West 12-Hp-1 1488 30-45 40% 12 CA
21961 Diablo 16-1 black 1488 13-20 39% 16 CA
21962 Team Colorado 16-N2 1488 27-25 52% 16 CO
21963 Storm Volleyball Club 14-Black 1488 49-34 57% 14 CO
21964 KKVC 14-Ne - blue 1488 2-2 50% 14 SD
21965 JJVA Club 13-F 1488 7-8 47% 13 FL
21966 R2R 17-1 1488 4-6 36% 17 PA
21967 KC Force 15-Black 1488 5-7 42% 15 MO
21968 Cougar 13-Green 1488 7-10 29% 13 IA
21969 Torrance Volleyball Club 12 1488 18-15 55% 12 CA
21970 Houston Hazard 12-Black 1488 11-10 52% 12 TX
21971 APEX VBC 16-Green 1488 5-5 50% 16 PA
21972 IVC 12-Gabby 1488 11-8 44% 12 TX
21973 Academy Skyline 12-1 1488 12-10 41% 12 TX
21974 Flyers 12-Nat-weiss 1488 18-19 45% 12 TX
21975 Cleveland Wave Volleyball Club 15 CWAVE Pelton 1488 12-15 44% 15 OH
21976 FVA 17-Flame - a 1488 5-11 26% 17 AK
21977 NPJ Seattle 11 National 1488 29-43 40% 11 WA
21978 Lineshot 11-Purple regional 1488 3-2 60% 11 OH
21979 Allons 13-Kylie 1488 18-13 55% 13 LA
21980 VVVBC 14 Sapphire 1488 16-17 48% 14 WA
21981 NE D-League 12-Black 1488 4-4 40% 12 IA
21982 SSWolfpack 16-Greywolves 1488 10-7 48% 16 MA
21983 Marshall JO 12-Black 1488 7-8 41% 12 MN
21984 CAVC 13-Club black 1488 7-10 41% 13 VA
21985 Pride 13-S eddie 1488 5-4 56% 13 LA
21986 Impact Volleyball Club 15-2 1488 20-21 44% 15 TX
21987 SVBC Spirit 14-Elite 1488 1-4 20% 14 IA
21988 MAVA 11 Gold 1488 1-1 50% 11 MN
21989 RRIV 14-Spring 1488 10-8 48% 14 ND
21990 Mighty Mo 16-Orange 1488 3-1 60% 16 MT
21991 Monsters 16-Elite royal 1487 27-18 60% 16 MI
21992 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 14-2 1487 3-3 43% 14 MO
21993 Synergy 12-Ember 1487 16-16 50% 12 PA
21994 FMTVA 15 Teal 1487 13-5 72% 15 TX
21995 Club Solano 14-Teal 1487 25-20 56% 14 CA
21996 TX STORM 15-Smack 1487 8-14 36% 15 TX
21997 Areté 15-Steel 1487 23-25 45% 15 TX
21998 Allegheny Volleyball Club 16-Black 1487 2-3 40% 16 PA
21999 Katy Stars 13 Elite 1487 21-23 48% 13 TX
22000 Flyers 15-Hfl-kevin 1487 2-2 50% 15 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.