Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 439 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21901 CCV 10-1 black 1488 3-5 38% 10 MN
21902 Southside Swarm VBC 13-1 1488 5-2 71% 13 MO
21903 Premier Nebraska 10-Gold 1488 2-3 40% 10 NE
21904 CB Elite 16-Navy 1488 4-5 44% 16 NV
21905 Lunatics 17-Tayler 1488 3-2 43% 17 UT
21906 Lions 10-Blue 1488 5-2 56% 10 IL
21907 Cape Coast 12-Gemini 1488 13-8 62% 12 FL
21908 WGVC 12-National 1488 21-18 54% 12 FL
21909 PR11 11-1 1488 6-15 29% 11 PR
21910 GRV 16-White-victoria 1488 11-15 42% 16 IN
21911 NNJ 16-Bella 1488 22-14 61% 16 NV
21912 WCVC 16-1 1488 12-11 52% 16 IN
21913 HPRIME 17-Adidas 1488 28-24 51% 17 TX
21914 Citrus 13-1 1488 4-4 50% 13 NV
21915 NE D-League 15-White 1488 4-5 40% 15 IA
21916 Colorado Elite 13-Kodiak 1488 20-24 45% 13 CO
21917 ESO 16-Select 1488 6-5 55% 16 OH
21918 NorthU 14-R orange 1488 4-5 44% 14 PA
21919 SVBC 15u Elite 1488 14-12 54% 15 IA
21920 Lakeville North 13-S 1488 2-2 50% 13 MN
21921 Metro VBC 16-Black 1488 17-32 35% 16 IN
21922 Red Storm 18 Storm 1488 10-10 50% 18 LA
21923 WNY Elite 16 1488 7-6 47% 16 NY
21924 Benson 14 1488 2-2 50% 14 MN
21925 Soar Volleyball Club 16 16 Heather 1488 14-18 44% 16 AL
21926 West Side 14-K. henderson 1488 5-8 38% 14 MN
21927 Boltz 14-Desertaces 1488 39-37 51% 14 AZ
21928 915 14-Josh 1488 22-33 39% 14 TX
21929 WACO VBC 14-Ua white 1488 18-17 49% 14 TX
21930 BCS Skyline H 14-Silver 1488 12-9 55% 14 TX
21931 MHVBC 13-1 1488 6-8 43% 13 OR
21932 HPRIME 11-Green 1488 2-2 50% 11 TX
21933 Big Cat Purple 14 1488 2-3 25% 14 IA
21934 575 15-Lpr david 1488 23-17 57% 15 GA
21935 OPVC 10-Washington 1488 2-2 50% 10 OH
21936 ZSA 13-Valiant 1488 15-17 47% 13 NJ
21937 SE Grays 17 1488 1-2 33% 17 NE
21938 NE Power VB 17-Force 1488 1-1 25% 17 NE
21939 TAMPA UNITED VBA 18-Red 1488 16-22 42% 18 FL
21940 AVA TX 16 Power 1488 26-33 43% 16 TX
21941 Oxford Volleyball Academy 14 14U OVA REN 1488 13-18 42% 14
21942 FMVBC 14-Erin 1488 21-14 60% 14 CO
21943 I AM VBC 15-WHITE 1488 23-18 56% 15 WI
21944 Iowa Select 13-Black 1488 18-16 46% 13 IA
21945 WVE 14-1 1488 13-14 48% 14 OR
21946 Momentous VBC 18-Jacob 1488 20-18 53% 18 CA
21947 BC Rise 13-Premier 1488 12-7 63% 13 TX
21948 MVP 60450 12U Red 1488 10-9 45% 12 IL
21949 BRUSA 13 Courtney 1488 20-20 50% 13 CA
21950 Starlings AV 13 Teal 1488 6-3 67% 13 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.