2025-2026 Season — Page 439 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21901 | CCV 10-1 black | 1488 | 3-5 | 38% | 10 | MN |
| 21902 | Southside Swarm VBC 13-1 | 1488 | 5-2 | 71% | 13 | MO |
| 21903 | Premier Nebraska 10-Gold | 1488 | 2-3 | 40% | 10 | NE |
| 21904 | CB Elite 16-Navy | 1488 | 4-5 | 44% | 16 | NV |
| 21905 | Lunatics 17-Tayler | 1488 | 3-2 | 43% | 17 | UT |
| 21906 | Lions 10-Blue | 1488 | 5-2 | 56% | 10 | IL |
| 21907 | Cape Coast 12-Gemini | 1488 | 13-8 | 62% | 12 | FL |
| 21908 | WGVC 12-National | 1488 | 21-18 | 54% | 12 | FL |
| 21909 | PR11 11-1 | 1488 | 6-15 | 29% | 11 | PR |
| 21910 | GRV 16-White-victoria | 1488 | 11-15 | 42% | 16 | IN |
| 21911 | NNJ 16-Bella | 1488 | 22-14 | 61% | 16 | NV |
| 21912 | WCVC 16-1 | 1488 | 12-11 | 52% | 16 | IN |
| 21913 | HPRIME 17-Adidas | 1488 | 28-24 | 51% | 17 | TX |
| 21914 | Citrus 13-1 | 1488 | 4-4 | 50% | 13 | NV |
| 21915 | NE D-League 15-White | 1488 | 4-5 | 40% | 15 | IA |
| 21916 | Colorado Elite 13-Kodiak | 1488 | 20-24 | 45% | 13 | CO |
| 21917 | ESO 16-Select | 1488 | 6-5 | 55% | 16 | OH |
| 21918 | NorthU 14-R orange | 1488 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | PA |
| 21919 | SVBC 15u Elite | 1488 | 14-12 | 54% | 15 | IA |
| 21920 | Lakeville North 13-S | 1488 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | MN |
| 21921 | Metro VBC 16-Black | 1488 | 17-32 | 35% | 16 | IN |
| 21922 | Red Storm 18 Storm | 1488 | 10-10 | 50% | 18 | LA |
| 21923 | WNY Elite 16 | 1488 | 7-6 | 47% | 16 | NY |
| 21924 | Benson 14 | 1488 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | MN |
| 21925 | Soar Volleyball Club 16 16 Heather | 1488 | 14-18 | 44% | 16 | AL |
| 21926 | West Side 14-K. henderson | 1488 | 5-8 | 38% | 14 | MN |
| 21927 | Boltz 14-Desertaces | 1488 | 39-37 | 51% | 14 | AZ |
| 21928 | 915 14-Josh | 1488 | 22-33 | 39% | 14 | TX |
| 21929 | WACO VBC 14-Ua white | 1488 | 18-17 | 49% | 14 | TX |
| 21930 | BCS Skyline H 14-Silver | 1488 | 12-9 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 21931 | MHVBC 13-1 | 1488 | 6-8 | 43% | 13 | OR |
| 21932 | HPRIME 11-Green | 1488 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | TX |
| 21933 | Big Cat Purple 14 | 1488 | 2-3 | 25% | 14 | IA |
| 21934 | 575 15-Lpr david | 1488 | 23-17 | 57% | 15 | GA |
| 21935 | OPVC 10-Washington | 1488 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | OH |
| 21936 | ZSA 13-Valiant | 1488 | 15-17 | 47% | 13 | NJ |
| 21937 | SE Grays 17 | 1488 | 1-2 | 33% | 17 | NE |
| 21938 | NE Power VB 17-Force | 1488 | 1-1 | 25% | 17 | NE |
| 21939 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 18-Red | 1488 | 16-22 | 42% | 18 | FL |
| 21940 | AVA TX 16 Power | 1488 | 26-33 | 43% | 16 | TX |
| 21941 | Oxford Volleyball Academy 14 14U OVA REN | 1488 | 13-18 | 42% | 14 | |
| 21942 | FMVBC 14-Erin | 1488 | 21-14 | 60% | 14 | CO |
| 21943 | I AM VBC 15-WHITE | 1488 | 23-18 | 56% | 15 | WI |
| 21944 | Iowa Select 13-Black | 1488 | 18-16 | 46% | 13 | IA |
| 21945 | WVE 14-1 | 1488 | 13-14 | 48% | 14 | OR |
| 21946 | Momentous VBC 18-Jacob | 1488 | 20-18 | 53% | 18 | CA |
| 21947 | BC Rise 13-Premier | 1488 | 12-7 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 21948 | MVP 60450 12U Red | 1488 | 10-9 | 45% | 12 | IL |
| 21949 | BRUSA 13 Courtney | 1488 | 20-20 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 21950 | Starlings AV 13 Teal | 1488 | 6-3 | 67% | 13 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.