Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 436 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21751 Uptime VB 16-1 1490 15-14 52% 16 TN
21752 Dig Deep 16-Warriors 1490 11-7 50% 16 NH
21753 Pitt United 13-Red 1490 12-18 40% 13 PA
21754 FSVC 17-Black amanda 1490 2-4 33% 17 NV
21755 Mustang 15 Thunderbolts 1490 1-3 25% 15 ID
21756 Madtown 14-White 1490 8-3 73% 14 WI
21757 Epic 14-Samba 1490 35-26 57% 14 WI
21758 Texas One 13-Navy 1490 11-10 52% 13 TX
21759 Texas Serve 13-S black 1490 11-11 50% 13 TX
21760 Hawaiian Style 15-Black 1490 6-7 46% 15 HI
21761 Tsunami 12-4a 1490 12-7 63% 12 GA
21762 Texas Storm 15 1490 12-13 48% 15 TX
21763 HVA 15-Rb blue 1490 20-15 57% 15 TX
21764 TIV 15-Black 1490 6-17 26% 15 TX
21765 adidas DYNASTY 11-3 1490 3-2 60% 11 KS
21766 Dig Deep 17-Ginger 1490 13-34 28% 17 NH
21767 SOMD 17-Black 1490 17-18 46% 17 MD
21768 SPARK 12-1 1490 8-10 44% 12 OK
21769 Golden Bear 16-Nike 1490 25-24 51% 16 CA
21770 Lassen Club Volleyball Company 16-1 1490 9-7 56% 16 CA
21771 Mass Pats 16-3 integrity 1490 9-8 41% 16 MA
21772 Aftershock 13-Maddison 1490 13-15 45% 13 CA
21773 MN Attack 12-1 1490 2-3 40% 12 MN
21774 CV Starlings 15-Marissa 1489 10-8 56% 15 CA
21775 Oiler Attack 17-Orange 1489 3-2 60% 17 OH
21776 AVA 11-Mcclelland 1489 4-5 44% 11 OH
21777 Oiler Attack 11-White 1489 2-2 50% 11 OH
21778 TNT 16-Tornado 1489 20-19 50% 16 PA
21779 Club 1 13-Skronkstrong 1489 15-19 44% 13 IL
21780 Centrasota 18 1489 3-2 60% 18 MN
21781 MARIN 12-Fire 1489 27-36 43% 12 CA
21782 FC Elite North 17-S 1489 4-7 36% 17 WI
21783 HDVC 12-Sara 1489 4-5 44% 12 TN
21784 FTL 17-Nuclear danny 1489 2-2 50% 17 FL
21785 Boost Volleyball 12 1489 2-2 50% 12 IA
21786 Red Rock 17-Eric - redwood city 1489 22-27 45% 17 CA
21787 Manhattan Mayhem 15-S 1489 8-8 50% 15 KS
21788 Xcel VB 18-1 premier 1489 19-21 46% 18 TX
21789 Cadillac VBC 16-1 1489 5-5 50% 16 MI
21790 MVP 15 Silver 1489 35-42 45% 15 WI
21791 COLAVOL 15-Carolina 1489 16-7 67% 15 GA
21792 Wichita Legacy 13-1 1489 4-5 44% 13 KS
21793 OK.OK Charge 15-10 15 west 1489 6-1 55% 15 OK
21794 Infinity 12-Blue 1489 9-15 38% 12 WI
21795 Tx Evolution 17-Red 1489 21-28 42% 17 TX
21796 PerfElite 18-1 1489 16-19 46% 18 NY
21797 TAV Houston 14-White 1489 25-35 42% 14 TX
21798 Skyline 14-Silver destiny 1489 18-18 41% 14 TX
21799 Destiny 14-White 1489 4-4 44% 14 TX
21800 KIVA 17-Grey 1489 24-27 47% 17 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.