Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 435 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21701 ITVC 17-1 1490 6-9 40% 17 WA
21702 Ignite Volleyball Club 12-Elite 1490 15-12 56% 12 CA
21703 Texas Outlaws 11-Black 1490 4-4 36% 11 TX
21704 Jax Skyline 10-Royal 1490 17-14 55% 10 FL
21705 AHAVA 15 1490 14-13 52% 15 TN
21706 CAVC 15-Power black 1490 13-14 48% 15 VA
21707 Strike Valley Volleyball Club 12 SV Snakelet White 1490 7-6 54% 12 NY
21708 EMV 11-N black april 1490 0-1 0% 11 TX
21709 BOLTS 15-B 1490 4-4 36% 15 IA
21710 Tsunami 16-2e eder 1490 27-29 48% 16 GA
21711 Lady Sharx 12-Pink 1490 18-18 49% 12 CA
21712 Ka Ulukoa 16-Reese 1490 18-27 40% 16 HI
21713 575 14-Pcr neal 1490 32-23 58% 14 GA
21714 MVC 13 Shannon 1490 17-14 55% 13 OH
21715 Elevate 13 Candace 1490 27-26 51% 13 SC
21716 KIVA 12 McKune 1490 5-3 63% 12 KY
21717 FIGSV 15-1 1490 27-25 52% 15 CA
21718 WTNVB 13-1 1490 3-2 60% 13 TN
21719 Black Creek VBC 15-1 1490 19-23 45% 15 FL
21720 Mintonette Sports 18-3 1490 22-23 49% 18 OH
21721 Motivate Volleyball Club 12-1 1490 20-23 47% 12 CA
21722 Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Shar (PM) (23) 1490 3-3 50% 12 SC
21723 Cass County 14-1 1490 14-13 40% 14 IN
21724 PRISM 15-Gab 1490 12-12 50% 15 CA
21725 YQL Selects Volleyball Club 15-Green 1490 4-3 57% 15 CA
21726 KCV 12 REGIONAL 1490 18-22 44% 12 TX
21727 Inferno 12 Firestorm 1490 9-8 53% 12 IL
21728 HVVC 15-White 1490 29-26 53% 15 MI
21729 Princeton Volleyball Club 15-Elite 1490 25-15 63% 15 NJ
21730 The 606 11-2 1490 4-2 67% 11 IL
21731 GRIT 16-Navy 1490 10-12 45% 16 IN
21732 SIVA 17-White 1490 13-13 50% 17 ID
21733 Independent 12-Byrum 1490 2-2 50% 12 IN
21734 PC Xtreme 14 1490 14-16 44% 14 IL
21735 Atomic! 14-Rebecca 1490 3-2 27% 14 MI
21736 VCNebraska 14-Navy 1490 6-6 50% 14 NE
21737 Rhythm 14 DT 1490 19-24 42% 14 TN
21738 Miami Hype 12-Premier 1490 25-18 58% 12 FL
21739 Renaissance 15-Red bc 1490 11-11 50% 15 OH
21740 Ace Volleyball Club 18 U18 Ace of Spades EP 1490 2-3 40% 18 CO
21741 CMA JO 16-Blue 1490 5-4 50% 16 MN
21742 Northern Revival 16-Lumberjack 1490 2-2 50% 16 MN
21743 Momentum Volleyball 15-Enkhy 1490 18-12 60% 15 CO
21744 White Lightning 16 1490 3-3 50% 16 MN
21745 ECEDAO 18-1 1490 3-4 43% 18 GA
21746 OVA 16-G select 1490 6-4 60% 16 AZ
21747 OVA 11-Black 1490 25-21 54% 11 FL
21748 Prime Time 17-Blue 1490 18-23 44% 17 IL
21749 adidas DYNASTY 18-3 1490 1-3 25% 18 KS
21750 Big Cats 12 1490 2-2 50% 12 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.