2025-2026 Season — Page 435 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21701 | ITVC 17-1 | 1490 | 6-9 | 40% | 17 | WA |
| 21702 | Ignite Volleyball Club 12-Elite | 1490 | 15-12 | 56% | 12 | CA |
| 21703 | Texas Outlaws 11-Black | 1490 | 4-4 | 36% | 11 | TX |
| 21704 | Jax Skyline 10-Royal | 1490 | 17-14 | 55% | 10 | FL |
| 21705 | AHAVA 15 | 1490 | 14-13 | 52% | 15 | TN |
| 21706 | CAVC 15-Power black | 1490 | 13-14 | 48% | 15 | VA |
| 21707 | Strike Valley Volleyball Club 12 SV Snakelet White | 1490 | 7-6 | 54% | 12 | NY |
| 21708 | EMV 11-N black april | 1490 | 0-1 | 0% | 11 | TX |
| 21709 | BOLTS 15-B | 1490 | 4-4 | 36% | 15 | IA |
| 21710 | Tsunami 16-2e eder | 1490 | 27-29 | 48% | 16 | GA |
| 21711 | Lady Sharx 12-Pink | 1490 | 18-18 | 49% | 12 | CA |
| 21712 | Ka Ulukoa 16-Reese | 1490 | 18-27 | 40% | 16 | HI |
| 21713 | 575 14-Pcr neal | 1490 | 32-23 | 58% | 14 | GA |
| 21714 | MVC 13 Shannon | 1490 | 17-14 | 55% | 13 | OH |
| 21715 | Elevate 13 Candace | 1490 | 27-26 | 51% | 13 | SC |
| 21716 | KIVA 12 McKune | 1490 | 5-3 | 63% | 12 | KY |
| 21717 | FIGSV 15-1 | 1490 | 27-25 | 52% | 15 | CA |
| 21718 | WTNVB 13-1 | 1490 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | TN |
| 21719 | Black Creek VBC 15-1 | 1490 | 19-23 | 45% | 15 | FL |
| 21720 | Mintonette Sports 18-3 | 1490 | 22-23 | 49% | 18 | OH |
| 21721 | Motivate Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1490 | 20-23 | 47% | 12 | CA |
| 21722 | Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Shar (PM) (23) | 1490 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | SC |
| 21723 | Cass County 14-1 | 1490 | 14-13 | 40% | 14 | IN |
| 21724 | PRISM 15-Gab | 1490 | 12-12 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 21725 | YQL Selects Volleyball Club 15-Green | 1490 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 21726 | KCV 12 REGIONAL | 1490 | 18-22 | 44% | 12 | TX |
| 21727 | Inferno 12 Firestorm | 1490 | 9-8 | 53% | 12 | IL |
| 21728 | HVVC 15-White | 1490 | 29-26 | 53% | 15 | MI |
| 21729 | Princeton Volleyball Club 15-Elite | 1490 | 25-15 | 63% | 15 | NJ |
| 21730 | The 606 11-2 | 1490 | 4-2 | 67% | 11 | IL |
| 21731 | GRIT 16-Navy | 1490 | 10-12 | 45% | 16 | IN |
| 21732 | SIVA 17-White | 1490 | 13-13 | 50% | 17 | ID |
| 21733 | Independent 12-Byrum | 1490 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | IN |
| 21734 | PC Xtreme 14 | 1490 | 14-16 | 44% | 14 | IL |
| 21735 | Atomic! 14-Rebecca | 1490 | 3-2 | 27% | 14 | MI |
| 21736 | VCNebraska 14-Navy | 1490 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | NE |
| 21737 | Rhythm 14 DT | 1490 | 19-24 | 42% | 14 | TN |
| 21738 | Miami Hype 12-Premier | 1490 | 25-18 | 58% | 12 | FL |
| 21739 | Renaissance 15-Red bc | 1490 | 11-11 | 50% | 15 | OH |
| 21740 | Ace Volleyball Club 18 U18 Ace of Spades EP | 1490 | 2-3 | 40% | 18 | CO |
| 21741 | CMA JO 16-Blue | 1490 | 5-4 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 21742 | Northern Revival 16-Lumberjack | 1490 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 21743 | Momentum Volleyball 15-Enkhy | 1490 | 18-12 | 60% | 15 | CO |
| 21744 | White Lightning 16 | 1490 | 3-3 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 21745 | ECEDAO 18-1 | 1490 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | GA |
| 21746 | OVA 16-G select | 1490 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | AZ |
| 21747 | OVA 11-Black | 1490 | 25-21 | 54% | 11 | FL |
| 21748 | Prime Time 17-Blue | 1490 | 18-23 | 44% | 17 | IL |
| 21749 | adidas DYNASTY 18-3 | 1490 | 1-3 | 25% | 18 | KS |
| 21750 | Big Cats 12 | 1490 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | IA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.