Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 434 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21651 South Central NE 15-White 1491 1-2 25% 15 NE
21652 EVC Black 18-1 1491 3-1 75% 18 WA
21653 NXT LVL 14-Black 1491 18-12 56% 14 GA
21654 314 VBC 13-Navy 1491 22-24 48% 13 MO
21655 MAVS KC 11-3 1491 1-2 20% 11 KS
21656 Lone Star Legacy Volleyball Academy 17-1 1491 11-12 48% 17 TX
21657 KC Power 14-4 1491 13-16 45% 14 KS
21658 Effingham Elite Volleyball Club LLC 13-R 1491 11-7 61% 13 GA
21659 Kids America 12-Webb 1491 9-8 53% 12 OH
21660 SPIRIT VBC 12-3 1491 8-10 44% 12 OH
21661 Aleta 12-2 1491 2-3 40% 12 OH
21662 Prime Time 12-Koalas 1491 17-18 49% 12 IL
21663 Purple Cobras 14-1 1491 7-6 47% 14 PA
21664 Image 11-National 1491 5-5 42% 11
21665 Waterloo Tigers 14 Tigers Elite 1491 3-2 60% 14 ON
21666 CGSV 11-Hunkler 1490 2-2 50% 11 OH
21667 SVBC Blazers 13 Emme 1490 12-12 50% 13 SC
21668 NNJ 13-Kaisa 1490 4-3 50% 13 NV
21669 Elite Volleyball 12 Elite Volleyball (OV) 1490 6-6 50% 12 IA
21670 Ohana V 14-Blue 1490 10-7 50% 14
21671 Ama Xtreme 16-Agtg 1490 1-4 20% 16
21672 Lakeside 18 Lakeside Askari 1490 4-4 44% 18 NY
21673 AEV 10 American 1490 10-13 43% 10 TX
21674 MIXX 16-1 1490 8-11 42% 16 FL
21675 Fearless 13-Black 1490 6-3 55% 13 IA
21676 SC 15 1490 12-10 52% 15
21677 PowerPlex 11-Zamzow 1490 14-13 50% 11 IA
21678 Velocity 219 13-Jocie 1490 25-17 60% 13 IN
21679 GM Elevate 12-1 1490 9-9 50% 12 MN
21680 MiElite 16-National east 1490 20-30 40% 16 MI
21681 Momentum Volleyball 14-Taryn 1490 18-14 56% 14 CO
21682 EnERgy 14-4 1490 4-2 67% 14 MN
21683 SVA 14-Black 1490 2-2 50% 14 MN
21684 Bameso USA 17-Gold 1490 2-2 50% 17 NJ
21685 NWE 12-2 1490 3-4 43% 12 WA
21686 HOVA 13-A black 1490 8-6 57% 13 OH
21687 NRG 14-National blue 1490 19-16 46% 14 TX
21688 516 Elite 13-White 1490 13-15 46% 13 NY
21689 EAST TEXAS ELITE - 14-1 1490 2-2 50% 14 TX
21690 VCV 15-S 1490 5-5 50% 15 SD
21691 Networks Acad 15-3 1490 8-6 38% 15 AL
21692 CJV 11-Select navy 1490 6-9 40% 11 NC
21693 PVA 16-National peak 1490 22-34 39% 16 NY
21694 EVA 17-Gold 1490 17-19 47% 17 NJ
21695 LAVBC 11-Gold 1490 15-20 43% 11 CA
21696 TVA 14-Orange (WE) 1490 12-8 43% 14 NY
21697 Junior Jays 15 1490 9-10 47% 15 MN
21698 LAV 15-Regional grey 1490 21-19 53% 15 AL
21699 Mets 16-2 emily 1490 3-2 60% 16 PR
21700 NMB 13-Regional pink daniel 1490 3-2 60% 13 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.