Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 433 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21601 Oasis 12-Regional 1491 14-13 52% 12 CA
21602 KeAloha 16-1 cp 1491 18-17 51% 16 IN
21603 Sunshine 12-South bay 1491 21-21 50% 12 CA
21604 Xcel VB 16-2 national 1491 22-19 54% 16 TX
21605 VBR 14-S black 1491 14-14 50% 14 LA
21606 ZZU 14-2 1491 4-5 44% 14 WA
21607 MIDTN Volleyball 12 Silver 1491 19-16 48% 12 TN
21608 New Age 16 Showcase 1491 27-22 53% 16 TX
21609 Winnerz Circle 17-2 1491 4-3 57% 17 FL
21610 Dig Deep 15-S 1491 13-11 54% 15 CO
21611 CALI 15-Gold 1491 17-19 47% 15 NY
21612 Idaho Strike 16-Black 1491 2-3 40% 16 ID
21613 CALI 15-Gold north 1491 18-12 60% 15 NY
21614 Prodigy 15-5 club 1491 6-8 43% 15 NY
21615 TNT 13-Gossamer 1491 5-3 50% 13 PA
21616 VIP Misfits 18-1 1491 22-16 58% 18 TX
21617 SYA Club 14 SYA Thunder 1491 15-14 48% 14
21618 ARVC 13-Teal adidas 1491 20-22 48% 13 NM
21619 316VBC 17-Red 1491 5-8 38% 17 KS
21620 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club 15-National 1491 4-3 57% 15 MA
21621 MAVS KC Select 13-1 1491 8-3 53% 13 KS
21622 Venetian Bay Volleyball Club 14 14u Venetian Bay FL 1491 18-14 56% 14 FL
21623 Reign 14-Black 1491 30-24 53% 14 FL
21624 Texas Serve 14-S gold 1491 21-19 53% 14 TX
21625 DS Elite 14 Ruby 1491 24-19 56% 14 TX
21626 PR Juniors 14-1 1491 2-3 40% 14 MN
21627 FPVC 13-Clara 1491 2-2 50% 13 CA
21628 KIVA 13 Aakash 1491 3-3 50% 13 KY
21629 KIVA 13-Blue 1491 30-27 53% 13 KY
21630 Impact VB 14-Ignite 1491 15-17 45% 14 SD
21631 NANI O WAIMEA 14 1491 2-3 40% 14 HI
21632 Stingray Blue 16-2 1491 25-18 58% 16 CA
21633 IMPACT 13-1s 1491 4-5 44% 13 TX
21634 HPRIME 15-Blue 1491 8-6 53% 15 TX
21635 Blaze 13-S 1491 2-2 40% 13 MN
21636 KCV 13 REGIONAL 1491 15-21 42% 13 TX
21637 Excel 13-Nat red 1491 0-1 0% 13 TX
21638 Club Cactus 14-Silver 1491 21-25 46% 14 AZ
21639 MNJRS 16-1 1491 4-4 50% 16 MN
21640 Ortonville 16-1 1491 2-1 40% 16 MN
21641 Adidas OPV 16-2 premier 1491 25-12 64% 16 OR
21642 HEAT 12-Miranda 1491 12-8 60% 12 FL
21643 LC Rise 12 1491 6-7 46% 12 KY
21644 Athens Elite 14-1 1491 3-2 60% 14 OH
21645 Academy 13 Jade 1491 27-26 51% 13 NC
21646 Alamo 12-Gold 2 1491 26-25 50% 12 TX
21647 SCWave 12-Rivercrest erica 1491 8-11 42% 12 IN
21648 AP 12-Wilco yellow 1491 21-15 58% 12 TX
21649 C1VB 15-Select easley 1491 17-14 55% 15 SC
21650 SC Midlands 15 Perform 1491 21-16 57% 15 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.