2025-2026 Season — Page 437 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21801 | Wildcats 14-2 blue | 1489 | 19-19 | 50% | 14 | OR |
| 21802 | AAVA 14-3 wave | 1489 | 16-23 | 41% | 14 | OR |
| 21803 | COVC 14-Reg gold | 1489 | 8-14 | 36% | 14 | OR |
| 21804 | Farmington Volleyball Club 14-3 | 1489 | 8-5 | 62% | 14 | MN |
| 21805 | Central City 13 | 1489 | 1-1 | 25% | 13 | IA |
| 21806 | A4 Volley 13-Lulu | 1489 | 17-18 | 49% | 13 | CA |
| 21807 | Tstreet IE 13-Tara | 1489 | 17-25 | 40% | 13 | CA |
| 21808 | TuoCo Elite 16-S | 1489 | 14-6 | 70% | 16 | CA |
| 21809 | NE Top Flight 12-Gold | 1489 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | NE |
| 21810 | The Shore 12-Diamond | 1489 | 13-10 | 57% | 12 | MI |
| 21811 | Orange Crush 16 | 1489 | 8-5 | 44% | 16 | IA |
| 21812 | LVA 15-National red | 1489 | 16-18 | 43% | 15 | TX |
| 21813 | Aus Velocity 15-3 sapphire | 1489 | 18-17 | 50% | 15 | TX |
| 21814 | GPA 16-Black elite | 1489 | 28-35 | 44% | 16 | OH |
| 21815 | Pirate 18-1 | 1489 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | OR |
| 21816 | DEAVB 13-Black | 1489 | 19-24 | 39% | 13 | TX |
| 21817 | TRUVC 13 | 1489 | 16-20 | 44% | 13 | TX |
| 21818 | CTX Juniors 13-Apex | 1489 | 14-17 | 45% | 13 | TX |
| 21819 | Spiketown 16-1 national | 1489 | 10-8 | 56% | 16 | OH |
| 21820 | Athens Elite 16-1 | 1489 | 4-5 | 44% | 16 | OH |
| 21821 | Charleston Crush Volleyball Club 18 | 1489 | 14-11 | 56% | 18 | SC |
| 21822 | The House 14-Premier | 1489 | 51-38 | 57% | 14 | MI |
| 21823 | SEC Elite 12-S - robbins | 1489 | 4-4 | 50% | 12 | CO |
| 21824 | AZ Sky 14-N2 | 1489 | 25-29 | 46% | 14 | AZ |
| 21825 | Maratonistas Volley 10-2 | 1489 | 3-2 | 60% | 10 | PR |
| 21826 | MVP Club 14-1 | 1489 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | WI |
| 21827 | 1W 14 Crimson | 1489 | 23-19 | 55% | 14 | WI |
| 21828 | Smash 14-1s | 1489 | 11-11 | 50% | 14 | WI |
| 21829 | KeAloha 15-1 cloudbreak | 1489 | 23-23 | 50% | 15 | IN |
| 21830 | HP Illinois 11-Red | 1489 | 2-1 | 50% | 11 | MO |
| 21831 | Jordan JO Volleyball 13-2 | 1489 | 3-4 | 38% | 13 | MN |
| 21832 | Phoenix 15-Orange | 1489 | 5-9 | 36% | 15 | OH |
| 21833 | Lineshot Volleyball Club 14 14 Purple National | 1489 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | OH |
| 21834 | ESO 14-Select | 1489 | 8-7 | 53% | 14 | OH |
| 21835 | BVA FC 15-Royal cheyenne | 1489 | 11-9 | 55% | 15 | KY |
| 21836 | Clarksville VBC 14 Jaime | 1489 | 25-16 | 60% | 14 | TN |
| 21837 | Warsaw 12-White | 1489 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | IN |
| 21838 | Michio Chicago 14-Select | 1489 | 24-20 | 55% | 14 | IL |
| 21839 | AP 12-Lite black | 1489 | 8-7 | 53% | 12 | TX |
| 21840 | Texas United 12-Navy | 1489 | 7-8 | 47% | 12 | TX |
| 21841 | Arsenal 13-Back | 1489 | 14-10 | 52% | 13 | OH |
| 21842 | Four1Nine Xtreme 13 13-Fluharty (OV) (12) | 1489 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | OH |
| 21843 | CVC 16 ROYAL | 1489 | 18-19 | 49% | 16 | OH |
| 21844 | CT STARS 15-S leah | 1489 | 16-9 | 64% | 15 | CT |
| 21845 | Platform 18-Black | 1489 | 36-25 | 55% | 18 | MD |
| 21846 | Cannon Falls JO 11-1 | 1489 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | MN |
| 21847 | Starlings 15-Pink | 1489 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | NE |
| 21848 | Tamales Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1489 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | MO |
| 21849 | Club Legacy 14-Bravo | 1489 | 13-13 | 50% | 14 | NE |
| 21850 | AVA 11-1 | 1489 | 3-2 | 60% | 11 | MA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.