Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 424 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21151 Surge 16-1 regional 1496 14-17 45% 16 AL
21152 adidas DYNASTY 13-4 1496 13-10 48% 13 KS
21153 EC Power Chesapeake 15-Black 1496 2-6 25% 15 PA
21154 AE VBC 16 1496 19-15 56% 16 CA
21155 Spire VC 15 Sanford 1496 28-27 51% 15 OH
21156 Empower 13 National 1496 19-22 46% 13 CA
21157 Academy North 13-Hp-2 1496 29-44 40% 13 CA
21158 Academy 15-Mi cobras 1496 11-10 52% 15 IN
21159 Skyline 15-White christine 1496 19-29 38% 15 TX
21160 Austin Skyline 12-Black 1496 18-29 38% 12 TX
21161 LCVC 17-Red 1496 3-2 60% 17 IN
21162 Bourbon City 14-1 1496 17-14 55% 14 KY
21163 Drive 17-1 blue 1496 25-21 54% 17 IL
21164 Elevate 14-Blue spring 1496 5-1 83% 14 IL
21165 Cap City MT 18-Regional diamonds 1496 3-4 38% 18 UT
21166 TQ 14 1495 22-18 55% 14 AZ
21167 Empire 17-Jalynn 1495 2-4 33% 17 CA
21168 Metro Performance 15-1 1495 5-5 31% 15
21169 Storm Volleyball Club 14 1495 11-10 37% 14 NY
21170 Synergy 14-Storm 1495 27-29 48% 14 PA
21171 Ark Jrs 14-Regional 1495 11-6 65% 14 AR
21172 Reef 14-National morgan 1495 19-28 40% 14 CA
21173 ACAD 14-Blue 1495 18-32 36% 14 NY
21174 Owasso Summit 14-Gray 1495 19-20 49% 14 OK
21175 NPJ Seattle 16-Black 1495 30-24 56% 16 WA
21176 Excel NW 14-3 silver 1495 22-16 56% 14 WA
21177 Prospects VBA 12-Aspire 1495 9-8 53% 12 IL
21178 RVA 15-Halder 1495 18-21 46% 15 IA
21179 Boost 15-S 1495 2-2 50% 15 IA
21180 Iowa Select 15-White 1495 18-17 47% 15 IA
21181 HVA 16-Rb red 1495 26-23 52% 16 TX
21182 MICA 18-Mindy 1495 5-5 38% 18 MI
21183 SEC Elite 15-S - wollert 1495 6-4 60% 15 CO
21184 Eagles Elite 12-1 1495 12-10 52% 12 AL
21185 F5 Sports Complex 12-1 1495 13-12 52% 12 TN
21186 Downstate 15-Pythons 1495 15-12 56% 15 NY
21187 Temecula Viper 18-2 brian/emma 1495 18-19 49% 18 CA
21188 Crush 15-1 1495 2-2 50% 15 PA
21189 NHouston Elite 12-Liberty 1495 6-5 55% 12 TX
21190 Crush 17-1 1495 5-5 45% 17 PA
21191 Palm Beach Jrs 14-1 1495 9-9 50% 14 FL
21192 Dime 13-Fresh 1495 20-20 50% 13 CA
21193 Renovators 15 U15 Jade 1495 3-8 27% 15
21194 Warren Sixpack 16-Black 1495 22-22 50% 16 NJ
21195 513VB 13-2 1495 18-31 37% 13 OH
21196 Crusader Juniors 12 1495 1-1 50% 12 MN
21197 ID Crush 13-Lopez 1495 9-22 29% 13 ID
21198 Metro Volleyball Club 14-South pw 1495 26-27 48% 14 DC
21199 Black Hills Juniors NH 12-1 1495 2-2 50% 12 WY
21200 Victorium 14-Elite 1495 20-27 43% 14 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.