2025-2026 Season — Page 425 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21201 | Rawlins 10-Mendez | 1495 | 7-4 | 54% | 10 | WY |
| 21202 | AAVA 17-1 storm | 1495 | 6-6 | 50% | 17 | OR |
| 21203 | MOVSelect 16-Black | 1495 | 17-14 | 55% | 16 | OH |
| 21204 | Jays 18 | 1495 | 10-3 | 77% | 18 | ND |
| 21205 | FL HYPE 16-Blue | 1495 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | FL |
| 21206 | Shenandoah Surge Volleyball Club 18 18U Shenandoah Surge WV (CH) | 1495 | 29-20 | 58% | 18 | MD |
| 21207 | Max Performance 14-Blue | 1495 | 20-28 | 42% | 14 | TX |
| 21208 | AVA TX 13-Attack | 1495 | 20-25 | 43% | 13 | TX |
| 21209 | Tier10 14-Red | 1495 | 31-20 | 61% | 14 | IN |
| 21210 | FTL UTD Volleyball 14 FTLUTD Fusion Sabrina (FL) | 1495 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | FL |
| 21211 | NSDVB 18 | 1495 | 18-13 | 58% | 18 | CA |
| 21212 | SVC 13-99 | 1495 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | IN |
| 21213 | Sharks 17-Silver | 1495 | 20-21 | 49% | 17 | AL |
| 21214 | Johnston 13-National | 1495 | 6-6 | 40% | 13 | IA |
| 21215 | GSI 17-Teal | 1495 | 10-14 | 42% | 17 | FL |
| 21216 | South County 13-Stingrays | 1495 | 12-20 | 38% | 13 | RI |
| 21217 | Southern Pines Volleyball Club 16 SPVC Pitch Pine | 1495 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | GA |
| 21218 | Nebraska ONE 15-Grey | 1495 | 13-13 | 50% | 15 | NE |
| 21219 | JCVC 14-N | 1495 | 21-11 | 66% | 14 | TN |
| 21220 | CENTRAL TX PERF 14-1 | 1495 | 7-6 | 54% | 14 | TX |
| 21221 | AEV 14 Club | 1495 | 14-13 | 52% | 14 | TX |
| 21222 | West Side 13-A: botz | 1495 | 7-7 | 47% | 13 | MN |
| 21223 | Illini Elite 18-L gold | 1495 | 12-11 | 52% | 18 | IL |
| 21224 | PVA 17-1 | 1495 | 29-18 | 60% | 17 | SC |
| 21225 | SLAM 15-P black | 1495 | 17-28 | 38% | 15 | MA |
| 21226 | SP2VC 12-1 white | 1495 | 5-5 | 50% | 12 | NC |
| 21227 | Club DD 12-1 | 1495 | 25-22 | 42% | 12 | MT |
| 21228 | 402VB 13-1 | 1495 | 2-2 | 40% | 13 | NE |
| 21229 | MN North 13-2 black | 1495 | 27-23 | 54% | 13 | MN |
| 21230 | RVA 18-1 | 1495 | 14-29 | 33% | 18 | OH |
| 21231 | Kaboom 12-2 | 1495 | 6-5 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 21232 | Venom Vipers 14-Girls | 1495 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | ON |
| 21233 | O3 13-Blue | 1495 | 26-14 | 63% | 13 | MI |
| 21234 | ARSEL 14-1 | 1495 | 15-9 | 63% | 14 | PR |
| 21235 | SUSA 13-Navy | 1495 | 5-3 | 63% | 13 | UT |
| 21236 | NM Cactus 18-Ntl | 1495 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | CO |
| 21237 | WPVC 17-Elite black | 1495 | 43-26 | 62% | 17 | FL |
| 21238 | Elevation 17 Ascent | 1495 | 33-21 | 61% | 17 | CO |
| 21239 | Rattlers 15-Gold | 1495 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | |
| 21240 | WWVA 16-Aces gold | 1495 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | CO |
| 21241 | WICHITA ACES 14-1 | 1495 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | KS |
| 21242 | Revolution 14 Bill | 1495 | 13-10 | 57% | 14 | NC |
| 21243 | MEVC 15 American | 1495 | 31-18 | 56% | 15 | MD |
| 21244 | Buffalo Stampeders 14-1 | 1495 | 36-29 | 55% | 14 | FL |
| 21245 | PVA 12-2 | 1495 | 4-5 | 29% | 12 | MO |
| 21246 | HP Illinois 13-Violet | 1495 | 1-1 | 33% | 13 | MO |
| 21247 | PVC Girls 12-1 | 1495 | 5-5 | 36% | 12 | NY |
| 21248 | Houston Force 17 Empire | 1495 | 21-35 | 38% | 17 | TX |
| 21249 | NSTRL 13-1 | 1495 | 6-3 | 40% | 13 | TN |
| 21250 | Rise 15-Yellow | 1495 | 19-25 | 43% | 15 | CO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.