2025-2026 Season — Page 423 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21101 | T4 Volleyball Club (IL) 14 T4 Volleyball (IL) 14G Navy (GL) | 1496 | 14-12 | 54% | 14 | IL |
| 21102 | SPVOS 14 Williams | 1496 | 14-6 | 70% | 14 | AZ |
| 21103 | LOSO 16-1 zoey | 1496 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | OH |
| 21104 | KOKUA 14-2 | 1496 | 10-17 | 37% | 14 | WA |
| 21105 | AJV 14 Navy | 1496 | 18-24 | 43% | 14 | TX |
| 21106 | Southernmost 15 | 1496 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 21107 | BSVBC 13-Navy | 1496 | 9-6 | 60% | 13 | IL |
| 21108 | Katy United 14-Red | 1496 | 13-8 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 21109 | 316VBC 16-Red | 1496 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | KS |
| 21110 | Edge 14-Green | 1496 | 20-16 | 56% | 14 | VA |
| 21111 | Champions 15-Elite | 1496 | 8-7 | 53% | 15 | AL |
| 21112 | Kidron VBC Davis 17 | 1496 | 10-12 | 45% | 17 | OH |
| 21113 | NASA 11-Purple | 1496 | 1-1 | 25% | 11 | AL |
| 21114 | TOVC 16-Angel sj | 1496 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | PR |
| 21115 | SAND 18-Black | 1496 | 16-20 | 44% | 18 | CA |
| 21116 | ARVC 15-Blue adidas | 1496 | 22-22 | 47% | 15 | NM |
| 21117 | Pu'uki 16-S | 1496 | 2-1 | 67% | 16 | HI |
| 21118 | BRUSA 18-Costa | 1496 | 18-18 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 21119 | 787EV 13-F hector | 1496 | 4-5 | 44% | 13 | PR |
| 21120 | AVC 17-1 | 1496 | 23-22 | 51% | 17 | MN |
| 21121 | PSVA Houston 16-1 | 1496 | 27-26 | 51% | 16 | GA |
| 21122 | shockwave reading 13-1 | 1496 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | PA |
| 21123 | Aspire 18-1 black | 1496 | 15-24 | 38% | 18 | AB |
| 21124 | Legacy 14-Bowman | 1496 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | OH |
| 21125 | DDVC 11-Club | 1496 | 11-13 | 33% | 11 | MD |
| 21126 | Lake Erie Crush 14 Lake Erie Crush-14U (14) | 1496 | 2-1 | 50% | 14 | |
| 21127 | Big Cat Volleyball 14-1 | 1496 | 3-6 | 33% | 14 | IA |
| 21128 | A'o a Koa Volleyball 13-G | 1496 | 18-18 | 50% | 13 | HI |
| 21129 | Ripset 14-White | 1496 | 13-13 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 21130 | Rolling Thunder 14 Fire | 1496 | 23-17 | 57% | 14 | IL |
| 21131 | KVA 10-Kelley | 1496 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | TX |
| 21132 | Highlands 14-Extreme | 1496 | 8-6 | 50% | 14 | PA |
| 21133 | Mass Impact 15-Mae | 1496 | 7-4 | 64% | 15 | MA |
| 21134 | Vantage 15-Blue smack | 1496 | 21-18 | 54% | 15 | OH |
| 21135 | Happy Volley 13-Tsunami | 1496 | 17-13 | 57% | 13 | PA |
| 21136 | Destiny 17-Bradi | 1496 | 11-9 | 55% | 17 | TX |
| 21137 | JM 10 Navy | 1496 | 2-2 | 50% | 10 | TX |
| 21138 | TAV South 10-Royal | 1496 | 6-3 | 46% | 10 | TX |
| 21139 | AE VBC 17 | 1496 | 23-18 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 21140 | Forza 12-Blk | 1496 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | IL |
| 21141 | West Noble 11-Arnold | 1496 | 2-2 | 50% | 11 | IN |
| 21142 | Storm Surge 12 12U Storm Surge | 1496 | 9-6 | 60% | 12 | LA |
| 21143 | SWI3D 14-White | 1496 | 2-1 | 50% | 14 | NE |
| 21144 | The Edge 18 Elite | 1496 | 10-6 | 63% | 18 | IL |
| 21145 | IMPACT - 14-4 | 1496 | 10-9 | 45% | 14 | TX |
| 21146 | Phoenix G18-Red | 1496 | 21-36 | 37% | 18 | OH |
| 21147 | Oasis 11-Regional | 1496 | 21-14 | 60% | 11 | CA |
| 21148 | Slainte 15-Forest | 1496 | 23-18 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 21149 | Thunder 11-S | 1496 | 3-2 | 60% | 11 | MN |
| 21150 | FORZA1 NORTH 14-Nat black | 1496 | 11-18 | 38% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.