Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 423 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21101 T4 Volleyball Club (IL) 14 T4 Volleyball (IL) 14G Navy (GL) 1496 14-12 54% 14 IL
21102 SPVOS 14 Williams 1496 14-6 70% 14 AZ
21103 LOSO 16-1 zoey 1496 2-2 50% 16 OH
21104 KOKUA 14-2 1496 10-17 37% 14 WA
21105 AJV 14 Navy 1496 18-24 43% 14 TX
21106 Southernmost 15 1496 6-3 67% 15 FL
21107 BSVBC 13-Navy 1496 9-6 60% 13 IL
21108 Katy United 14-Red 1496 13-8 62% 14 TX
21109 316VBC 16-Red 1496 2-2 50% 16 KS
21110 Edge 14-Green 1496 20-16 56% 14 VA
21111 Champions 15-Elite 1496 8-7 53% 15 AL
21112 Kidron VBC Davis 17 1496 10-12 45% 17 OH
21113 NASA 11-Purple 1496 1-1 25% 11 AL
21114 TOVC 16-Angel sj 1496 4-3 57% 16 PR
21115 SAND 18-Black 1496 16-20 44% 18 CA
21116 ARVC 15-Blue adidas 1496 22-22 47% 15 NM
21117 Pu'uki 16-S 1496 2-1 67% 16 HI
21118 BRUSA 18-Costa 1496 18-18 50% 18 CA
21119 787EV 13-F hector 1496 4-5 44% 13 PR
21120 AVC 17-1 1496 23-22 51% 17 MN
21121 PSVA Houston 16-1 1496 27-26 51% 16 GA
21122 shockwave reading 13-1 1496 7-8 47% 13 PA
21123 Aspire 18-1 black 1496 15-24 38% 18 AB
21124 Legacy 14-Bowman 1496 3-3 50% 14 OH
21125 DDVC 11-Club 1496 11-13 33% 11 MD
21126 Lake Erie Crush 14 Lake Erie Crush-14U (14) 1496 2-1 50% 14
21127 Big Cat Volleyball 14-1 1496 3-6 33% 14 IA
21128 A'o a Koa Volleyball 13-G 1496 18-18 50% 13 HI
21129 Ripset 14-White 1496 13-13 50% 14 CA
21130 Rolling Thunder 14 Fire 1496 23-17 57% 14 IL
21131 KVA 10-Kelley 1496 2-2 50% 10 TX
21132 Highlands 14-Extreme 1496 8-6 50% 14 PA
21133 Mass Impact 15-Mae 1496 7-4 64% 15 MA
21134 Vantage 15-Blue smack 1496 21-18 54% 15 OH
21135 Happy Volley 13-Tsunami 1496 17-13 57% 13 PA
21136 Destiny 17-Bradi 1496 11-9 55% 17 TX
21137 JM 10 Navy 1496 2-2 50% 10 TX
21138 TAV South 10-Royal 1496 6-3 46% 10 TX
21139 AE VBC 17 1496 23-18 56% 17 CA
21140 Forza 12-Blk 1496 2-3 40% 12 IL
21141 West Noble 11-Arnold 1496 2-2 50% 11 IN
21142 Storm Surge 12 12U Storm Surge 1496 9-6 60% 12 LA
21143 SWI3D 14-White 1496 2-1 50% 14 NE
21144 The Edge 18 Elite 1496 10-6 63% 18 IL
21145 IMPACT - 14-4 1496 10-9 45% 14 TX
21146 Phoenix G18-Red 1496 21-36 37% 18 OH
21147 Oasis 11-Regional 1496 21-14 60% 11 CA
21148 Slainte 15-Forest 1496 23-18 56% 15 CA
21149 Thunder 11-S 1496 3-2 60% 11 MN
21150 FORZA1 NORTH 14-Nat black 1496 11-18 38% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.