2025-2026 Season — Page 422 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21051 | Uncommon 11 | 1496 | 7-13 | 32% | 11 | |
| 21052 | FORZA1 NORTH 14-Nat black | 1496 | 11-18 | 38% | 14 | CA |
| 21053 | Ripset 14-White | 1496 | 13-13 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 21054 | Austin Skyline 12-Black | 1496 | 18-29 | 38% | 12 | TX |
| 21055 | KOKUA 14-2 | 1496 | 10-17 | 37% | 14 | WA |
| 21056 | IMPACT - 14-4 | 1496 | 10-9 | 45% | 14 | TX |
| 21057 | SPVOS 14 Williams | 1496 | 14-6 | 70% | 14 | AZ |
| 21058 | EC Power Chesapeake 15-Black | 1496 | 2-6 | 25% | 15 | PA |
| 21059 | AVB Fire 15-3 | 1496 | 7-4 | 64% | 15 | MN |
| 21060 | FaR Out 15 Diamond | 1496 | 22-18 | 55% | 15 | MI |
| 21061 | Skyline 15-White christine | 1496 | 19-29 | 38% | 15 | TX |
| 21062 | LCVC 17-Red | 1496 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | IN |
| 21063 | EVOLVE 13-Black | 1496 | 8-5 | 42% | 13 | TX |
| 21064 | Texas Storm 13-Black | 1496 | 11-9 | 55% | 13 | TX |
| 21065 | Spire VC 15 Sanford | 1496 | 28-27 | 51% | 15 | OH |
| 21066 | 787EV 13-F hector | 1496 | 4-5 | 44% | 13 | PR |
| 21067 | Happy Volley 13-Tsunami | 1496 | 17-13 | 57% | 13 | PA |
| 21068 | shockwave reading 13-1 | 1496 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | PA |
| 21069 | TOVC 16-Angel sj | 1496 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | PR |
| 21070 | The Edge 18 Elite | 1496 | 10-6 | 63% | 18 | IL |
| 21071 | Phoenix G18-Red | 1496 | 21-36 | 37% | 18 | OH |
| 21072 | MCVC 12 | 1496 | 3-6 | 30% | 12 | MT |
| 21073 | Michio Chicago 15-Premier | 1496 | 10-23 | 30% | 15 | IL |
| 21074 | Oasis 11-Regional | 1496 | 21-14 | 60% | 11 | CA |
| 21075 | KMS SAINTS JO 15-Paehlke | 1496 | 1-2 | 33% | 15 | MN |
| 21076 | OYVBA 12-Silver | 1496 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | MN |
| 21077 | Edge 14-Green | 1496 | 20-16 | 56% | 14 | VA |
| 21078 | Legit 13-B | 1496 | 1-2 | 20% | 13 | IA |
| 21079 | Aspire 18-1 black | 1496 | 15-24 | 38% | 18 | AB |
| 21080 | 517 Elite 13-Black | 1496 | 8-4 | 57% | 13 | MI |
| 21081 | MiElite 14-Emma west | 1496 | 4-6 | 31% | 14 | MI |
| 21082 | Champions 15-Elite | 1496 | 8-7 | 53% | 15 | AL |
| 21083 | NVC 14-Snowpack | 1496 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | TN |
| 21084 | Katy United 14-Red | 1496 | 13-8 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 21085 | SA Valkyries 14-White | 1496 | 23-13 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 21086 | AJV 14 Navy | 1496 | 18-24 | 43% | 14 | TX |
| 21087 | FRVBC 13-1 black | 1496 | 12-18 | 40% | 13 | CO |
| 21088 | Hype VB 16-Smith | 1496 | 9-11 | 39% | 16 | MS |
| 21089 | EVOLUTION RED 15 | 1496 | 4-5 | 40% | 15 | IA |
| 21090 | ARVC 15-Blue adidas | 1496 | 22-22 | 47% | 15 | NM |
| 21091 | Bolts 15 | 1496 | 4-3 | 44% | 15 | ON |
| 21092 | AVC 17-1 | 1496 | 23-22 | 51% | 17 | MN |
| 21093 | adidas DYNASTY 13-4 | 1496 | 13-10 | 48% | 13 | KS |
| 21094 | Storm Surge 12 12U Storm Surge | 1496 | 9-6 | 60% | 12 | LA |
| 21095 | Texas Tornados 17-National | 1496 | 14-20 | 41% | 17 | TX |
| 21096 | Lake Erie Crush 14 Lake Erie Crush-14U (14) | 1496 | 2-1 | 50% | 14 | |
| 21097 | Club North Volleyball KC 17-1 | 1496 | 3-3 | 43% | 17 | MO |
| 21098 | LJVBC 16-1 | 1496 | 9-12 | 39% | 16 | KS |
| 21099 | Highlands 14-Extreme | 1496 | 8-6 | 50% | 14 | PA |
| 21100 | Vernal Velocity 16-Sarah and steve | 1496 | 3-3 | 43% | 16 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.