Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 422 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
21051 Uncommon 11 1496 7-13 32% 11
21052 FORZA1 NORTH 14-Nat black 1496 11-18 38% 14 CA
21053 Ripset 14-White 1496 13-13 50% 14 CA
21054 Austin Skyline 12-Black 1496 18-29 38% 12 TX
21055 KOKUA 14-2 1496 10-17 37% 14 WA
21056 IMPACT - 14-4 1496 10-9 45% 14 TX
21057 SPVOS 14 Williams 1496 14-6 70% 14 AZ
21058 EC Power Chesapeake 15-Black 1496 2-6 25% 15 PA
21059 AVB Fire 15-3 1496 7-4 64% 15 MN
21060 FaR Out 15 Diamond 1496 22-18 55% 15 MI
21061 Skyline 15-White christine 1496 19-29 38% 15 TX
21062 LCVC 17-Red 1496 3-2 60% 17 IN
21063 EVOLVE 13-Black 1496 8-5 42% 13 TX
21064 Texas Storm 13-Black 1496 11-9 55% 13 TX
21065 Spire VC 15 Sanford 1496 28-27 51% 15 OH
21066 787EV 13-F hector 1496 4-5 44% 13 PR
21067 Happy Volley 13-Tsunami 1496 17-13 57% 13 PA
21068 shockwave reading 13-1 1496 7-8 47% 13 PA
21069 TOVC 16-Angel sj 1496 4-3 57% 16 PR
21070 The Edge 18 Elite 1496 10-6 63% 18 IL
21071 Phoenix G18-Red 1496 21-36 37% 18 OH
21072 MCVC 12 1496 3-6 30% 12 MT
21073 Michio Chicago 15-Premier 1496 10-23 30% 15 IL
21074 Oasis 11-Regional 1496 21-14 60% 11 CA
21075 KMS SAINTS JO 15-Paehlke 1496 1-2 33% 15 MN
21076 OYVBA 12-Silver 1496 3-2 60% 12 MN
21077 Edge 14-Green 1496 20-16 56% 14 VA
21078 Legit 13-B 1496 1-2 20% 13 IA
21079 Aspire 18-1 black 1496 15-24 38% 18 AB
21080 517 Elite 13-Black 1496 8-4 57% 13 MI
21081 MiElite 14-Emma west 1496 4-6 31% 14 MI
21082 Champions 15-Elite 1496 8-7 53% 15 AL
21083 NVC 14-Snowpack 1496 2-3 40% 14 TN
21084 Katy United 14-Red 1496 13-8 62% 14 TX
21085 SA Valkyries 14-White 1496 23-13 62% 14 TX
21086 AJV 14 Navy 1496 18-24 43% 14 TX
21087 FRVBC 13-1 black 1496 12-18 40% 13 CO
21088 Hype VB 16-Smith 1496 9-11 39% 16 MS
21089 EVOLUTION RED 15 1496 4-5 40% 15 IA
21090 ARVC 15-Blue adidas 1496 22-22 47% 15 NM
21091 Bolts 15 1496 4-3 44% 15 ON
21092 AVC 17-1 1496 23-22 51% 17 MN
21093 adidas DYNASTY 13-4 1496 13-10 48% 13 KS
21094 Storm Surge 12 12U Storm Surge 1496 9-6 60% 12 LA
21095 Texas Tornados 17-National 1496 14-20 41% 17 TX
21096 Lake Erie Crush 14 Lake Erie Crush-14U (14) 1496 2-1 50% 14
21097 Club North Volleyball KC 17-1 1496 3-3 43% 17 MO
21098 LJVBC 16-1 1496 9-12 39% 16 KS
21099 Highlands 14-Extreme 1496 8-6 50% 14 PA
21100 Vernal Velocity 16-Sarah and steve 1496 3-3 43% 16 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.