2025-2026 Season — Page 421 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21001 | Shock 16-Surge | 1497 | 25-19 | 57% | 16 | IL |
| 21002 | Voltage 13-White - melissa | 1497 | 14-9 | 58% | 13 | FL |
| 21003 | Sanford Sports 11-Black | 1497 | 6-9 | 32% | 11 | SD |
| 21004 | District 12 13 ULTRA | 1497 | 8-6 | 57% | 13 | FL |
| 21005 | E2 13-Royal | 1497 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | KY |
| 21006 | KVA 12-Richard | 1497 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | HI |
| 21007 | Kansas Rise VBC C 12-2 | 1497 | 7-5 | 58% | 12 | KS |
| 21008 | Revenge VB 16 Revenge VBC (2) | 1497 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | |
| 21009 | Orange Crush 12 | 1497 | 6-4 | 60% | 12 | IA |
| 21010 | TAINAS 11 | 1497 | 3-2 | 60% | 11 | PR |
| 21011 | Mt. Hood 16-1 timberline | 1497 | 26-20 | 57% | 16 | OR |
| 21012 | CPA CdA 12 | 1497 | 19-12 | 61% | 12 | WA |
| 21013 | S.W.A.G. VOLLEYBALL 14-1 | 1497 | 12-8 | 60% | 14 | GA |
| 21014 | Zona VBC 13-R2 | 1497 | 15-5 | 75% | 13 | AZ |
| 21015 | SOSVBC 16-T jules | 1497 | 7-3 | 70% | 16 | NY |
| 21016 | EnERgy 14-3 | 1497 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | MN |
| 21017 | CEV Diamond 14-2 | 1497 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | OH |
| 21018 | Medford Storm 14-1 | 1497 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | WI |
| 21019 | GCVBC 11-Schmitgen | 1497 | 5-6 | 45% | 11 | OH |
| 21020 | WSRVC 14-Patchen/fink | 1497 | 16-9 | 64% | 14 | WY |
| 21021 | UVA 14 Regional | 1497 | 30-24 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 21022 | BAE 14-2 jovani | 1497 | 2-6 | 25% | 14 | NV |
| 21023 | Brooks Rush 15 | 1497 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | |
| 21024 | 319 United 13-Amy | 1497 | 2-2 | 40% | 13 | IA |
| 21025 | Lions 18-1 | 1497 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | AB |
| 21026 | Panther Girls 18-Black | 1497 | 22-22 | 50% | 18 | CO |
| 21027 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 15-T faith | 1497 | 14-11 | 56% | 15 | NJ |
| 21028 | WSA Gators 15-Regional | 1497 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | FL |
| 21029 | TuoCo Elite 15-S | 1497 | 10-18 | 36% | 15 | CA |
| 21030 | Unified 16-Royal | 1497 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | MI |
| 21031 | UVA 15-S national black | 1497 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | LA |
| 21032 | 314 VBC 16-Navy | 1497 | 28-23 | 55% | 16 | MO |
| 21033 | Crossfire 16-Gold | 1497 | 10-8 | 56% | 16 | MN |
| 21034 | Tr1be Volleyball 16 | 1497 | 7-10 | 41% | 16 | WY |
| 21035 | Miami Bombers 18-Bomba | 1497 | 23-44 | 34% | 18 | FL |
| 21036 | KC Fire Volleyball 14-2 | 1497 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | KS |
| 21037 | HI RISE 12-99 | 1497 | 9-7 | 56% | 12 | HI |
| 21038 | DDVC 11-Club | 1496 | 11-13 | 33% | 11 | MD |
| 21039 | Vipers 16-Black | 1496 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | NJ |
| 21040 | Elevate 14-Blue spring | 1496 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | IL |
| 21041 | T4 Volleyball Club (IL) 14 T4 Volleyball (IL) 14G Navy (GL) | 1496 | 14-12 | 54% | 14 | IL |
| 21042 | Rolling Thunder 14 Fire | 1496 | 23-17 | 57% | 14 | IL |
| 21043 | AVB Fire 15-3 | 1496 | 7-4 | 64% | 15 | MN |
| 21044 | Big Cat Volleyball 14-1 | 1496 | 3-6 | 33% | 14 | IA |
| 21045 | Legit 13-B | 1496 | 1-2 | 20% | 13 | IA |
| 21046 | KMS SAINTS JO 15-Paehlke | 1496 | 1-2 | 33% | 15 | MN |
| 21047 | SSWolfpack 16-Redwolves | 1496 | 8-8 | 36% | 16 | MA |
| 21048 | MiElite 14-Emma west | 1496 | 4-6 | 31% | 14 | MI |
| 21049 | MCVC 12 | 1496 | 3-6 | 30% | 12 | MT |
| 21050 | AVC 17-1 | 1496 | 23-22 | 51% | 17 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.