Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 414 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
20651 SA Force 14-2 national 1500 0-0 0% 14 NV
20652 Spirit 18 1500 2-1 50% 18 IA
20653 OKC Ignite Volleyball Club 16-Black 1500 0-0 0% 16 OK
20654 PIRATAS ADN 17-2 1500 8-17 32% 17 PR
20655 Bulgarian Volleyball Academy 13-Matt 1500 0-0 0% 13 IL
20656 Lakewood Area Volleyball Association 16-Xcel 1500 0-0 0% 16 NC
20657 IA Juniors 13-Black 1500 30-36 45% 13 IA
20658 2Legit 16-Black 1500 6-3 67% 16 FL
20659 VV U14 1500 29-23 56% 14 VA
20660 Matchbox Volleyball Club 13-Elite 1500 0-0 0% 13 SD
20661 2.0 16-testing 1500 0-0 0% 16 IL
20662 NW Elite Volleyball Club 13-Power 1500 0-0 0% 13 OR
20663 Velocity 15-National 1500 0-0 0% 15 AR
20664 Solon 13 1500 1-1 33% 13 IA
20665 MidShore Volleyball 17 17U MidShore Menace (CH) 1500 14-11 52% 17
20666 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 16-Gold 1500 14-21 40% 16 ME
20667 Premier 17 Crimson 1500 13-26 32% 17 TX
20668 TopSpin 11-Red 1500 14-12 54% 11 KY
20669 CCVBC 15-Tanner 1500 24-24 50% 15 CA
20670 Vertical 13 1500 3-6 33% 13 IL
20671 Unified 12-Ocean 1500 2-3 40% 12 MI
20672 Lakes Elite 14-1 1500 6-8 43% 14 MN
20673 Roseville 11-1 1500 2-2 50% 11 MN
20674 A5 Gwinnett 16-Kristen 1500 28-20 58% 16 GA
20675 Pitt United 16-Blue 1500 20-18 53% 16 PA
20676 diggersz 11-Black-amanda 1500 6-6 46% 11 IL
20677 Dallas Starlings VBC 13-National 1500 0-0 0% 13 TX
20678 Barracuda Volleyball Club 16-Black jessica 1500 0-0 0% 16 NC
20679 NW Elite 14-6 green 1500 18-20 47% 14 OR
20680 ARAA 11-Ydt maroon 1500 1-1 50% 11 MN
20681 Citrus Fusion Volleyball Club 12-1 1500 0-0 0% 12 FL
20682 Carolina Union Volleyball Club 16-James 1500 0-0 0% 16 NC
20683 Rampage 18-1 1500 5-2 71% 18 WA
20684 Tier 10-14 white 1500 12-28 30% 10 IN
20685 EMV 12-Royal kate 1500 0-0 0% 12 TX
20686 Nebraska D-League Volleyball 16-Antonette 1500 0-0 0% 16 IA
20687 Mizuno M1 14-2 1500 40-32 56% 14 MN
20688 NYC VBA 15 Soho 1500 36-40 47% 15 NY
20689 HHVBC 12-2 1500 2-2 50% 12 IA
20690 JCC JRs 14-S black 1500 3-3 38% 14 MN
20691 Chicago Elite 13 Elite 1500 24-33 42% 13 IL
20692 LES 17-Silver 1500 25-10 69% 17 NY
20693 Red Rock Volleyball Club 13-Nova 1500 0-0 0% 13 CA
20694 Ignite Volleyball Club 13-Elite jasmine v 1500 0-0 0% 13 LA
20695 DE.Ozark Juniors 13-4 reg. plus 1500 0-0 0% 13 AR
20696 Amarillo Xtreme Volleyball 12-Roshambo 1500 0-0 0% 12 TX
20697 DE.Ozark Juniors 12-2 blue 1500 0-0 0% 12 AR
20698 PAO STL 16-Red 1500 0-0 0% 16 MO
20699 New Wave 18-Brown 1500 0-0 0% 18 OH
20700 Net 12-S 1500 0-0 0% 12 AR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.