Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 413 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
20601 Rampage 18-1 1500 5-2 71% 18 WA
20602 Jordan Newberry Demo Site 16 JNDS-7 (3) 1500 0-0 0% 16
20603 Energy 13 Thunder 1500 34-22 60% 13 IL
20604 Elevate Ak Volleyball Club 13-Leanna 1500 0-0 0% 13 AK
20605 Mt. Hood Volleyball Club 16-National brock 1500 0-0 0% 16 OR
20606 AVA 12-N lite charles 1500 17-15 53% 12 OH
20607 LOTOVC G15-1 1500 0-0 0% 15 MO
20608 WF Waves 16-Charlette 1500 15-14 52% 16 AL
20609 P3R 17-Platinum 1500 22-35 39% 17 PA
20610 Summit 13-Orange elite 1500 19-14 58% 13 IN
20611 TopSpin 11-Red 1500 14-12 54% 11 KY
20612 Vision 15-Exv black 1500 18-24 41% 15 TX
20613 Set Above Volleyball Academy 16 SAVA Avalanche (GE) 1500 2-2 40% 16 NY
20614 SGJO 17-1 1500 6-7 46% 17 MN
20615 NCVBC 12-1 black 1500 8-8 50% 12 OR
20616 BLVC 12-White 1500 4-3 57% 12 UT
20617 Touch 3 14-Blue 1500 0-0 0% 14 CA
20618 Spire VC 18-Bobish 1500 4-2 67% 18 OH
20619 Tier 10-14 white 1500 12-28 30% 10 IN
20620 Vegas United Volleyball Club 17-Adidas 1500 0-0 0% 17 NV
20621 CCVBC 15-Tanner 1500 24-24 50% 15 CA
20622 Wyoming Sports Ranch 17-1 1500 0-0 0% 17
20623 Northern Ace 16-1 1500 16-11 53% 16 ND
20624 Mt. Hood Volleyball Club 16-Regional 1500 0-0 0% 16 OR
20625 Chi City Elite 14-2 1500 20-32 38% 14 IL
20626 TAV South 12-S 1500 0-0 0% 12 TX
20627 JCC JRs 14-S black 1500 3-3 38% 14 MN
20628 SC Rockstar 15-Adam 1500 21-32 40% 15 CA
20629 NSSC 12 Nike 1500 28-22 54% 12 MO
20630 Lawrence Landsharks 16-2 1500 3-4 30% 16 KS
20631 CRSURGEVBC 16-Harlyn 1500 16-14 53% 16 IA
20632 OCVC 14-Red 1500 11-10 52% 14 CA
20633 Sky High 12-Anderlik -spr 1500 4-4 50% 12 IL
20634 BCS Skyline H 11-Molten 1500 7-5 58% 11 TX
20635 SEV 18-2 1500 10-9 50% 18 MN
20636 Amarillo Xtreme Volleyball 12-Roshambo 1500 0-0 0% 12 TX
20637 DE.Ozark Juniors 13-4 reg. plus 1500 0-0 0% 13 AR
20638 BAVC 13-1 royals 1500 22-17 56% 13 OK
20639 Ignite 15-Grey 1500 25-16 61% 15 WA
20640 STRIKE 14-White 1500 18-10 64% 14 AZ
20641 Exile 16-Black 1500 4-2 67% 16 IA
20642 Spirit 18 1500 2-1 50% 18 IA
20643 Ohio Valley Volleyball Company 16-Adidas g 1500 0-0 0% 16 OH
20644 PIRATAS ADN 17-2 1500 8-17 32% 17 PR
20645 360 Volleyball Club 13-Ultra 1500 0-0 0% 13 TX
20646 Dest 13-W 1500 0-0 0% 13
20647 ICV 13-Griffin fw 1500 0-0 0% 13
20648 IA Juniors 13-Black 1500 30-36 45% 13 IA
20649 2Legit 16-Black 1500 6-3 67% 16 FL
20650 VV U14 1500 29-23 56% 14 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.