2025-2026 Season — Page 413 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20601 | Rampage 18-1 | 1500 | 5-2 | 71% | 18 | WA |
| 20602 | Jordan Newberry Demo Site 16 JNDS-7 (3) | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 20603 | Energy 13 Thunder | 1500 | 34-22 | 60% | 13 | IL |
| 20604 | Elevate Ak Volleyball Club 13-Leanna | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | AK |
| 20605 | Mt. Hood Volleyball Club 16-National brock | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | OR |
| 20606 | AVA 12-N lite charles | 1500 | 17-15 | 53% | 12 | OH |
| 20607 | LOTOVC G15-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 15 | MO |
| 20608 | WF Waves 16-Charlette | 1500 | 15-14 | 52% | 16 | AL |
| 20609 | P3R 17-Platinum | 1500 | 22-35 | 39% | 17 | PA |
| 20610 | Summit 13-Orange elite | 1500 | 19-14 | 58% | 13 | IN |
| 20611 | TopSpin 11-Red | 1500 | 14-12 | 54% | 11 | KY |
| 20612 | Vision 15-Exv black | 1500 | 18-24 | 41% | 15 | TX |
| 20613 | Set Above Volleyball Academy 16 SAVA Avalanche (GE) | 1500 | 2-2 | 40% | 16 | NY |
| 20614 | SGJO 17-1 | 1500 | 6-7 | 46% | 17 | MN |
| 20615 | NCVBC 12-1 black | 1500 | 8-8 | 50% | 12 | OR |
| 20616 | BLVC 12-White | 1500 | 4-3 | 57% | 12 | UT |
| 20617 | Touch 3 14-Blue | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 20618 | Spire VC 18-Bobish | 1500 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | OH |
| 20619 | Tier 10-14 white | 1500 | 12-28 | 30% | 10 | IN |
| 20620 | Vegas United Volleyball Club 17-Adidas | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | NV |
| 20621 | CCVBC 15-Tanner | 1500 | 24-24 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 20622 | Wyoming Sports Ranch 17-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | |
| 20623 | Northern Ace 16-1 | 1500 | 16-11 | 53% | 16 | ND |
| 20624 | Mt. Hood Volleyball Club 16-Regional | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | OR |
| 20625 | Chi City Elite 14-2 | 1500 | 20-32 | 38% | 14 | IL |
| 20626 | TAV South 12-S | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 20627 | JCC JRs 14-S black | 1500 | 3-3 | 38% | 14 | MN |
| 20628 | SC Rockstar 15-Adam | 1500 | 21-32 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 20629 | NSSC 12 Nike | 1500 | 28-22 | 54% | 12 | MO |
| 20630 | Lawrence Landsharks 16-2 | 1500 | 3-4 | 30% | 16 | KS |
| 20631 | CRSURGEVBC 16-Harlyn | 1500 | 16-14 | 53% | 16 | IA |
| 20632 | OCVC 14-Red | 1500 | 11-10 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 20633 | Sky High 12-Anderlik -spr | 1500 | 4-4 | 50% | 12 | IL |
| 20634 | BCS Skyline H 11-Molten | 1500 | 7-5 | 58% | 11 | TX |
| 20635 | SEV 18-2 | 1500 | 10-9 | 50% | 18 | MN |
| 20636 | Amarillo Xtreme Volleyball 12-Roshambo | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 20637 | DE.Ozark Juniors 13-4 reg. plus | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | AR |
| 20638 | BAVC 13-1 royals | 1500 | 22-17 | 56% | 13 | OK |
| 20639 | Ignite 15-Grey | 1500 | 25-16 | 61% | 15 | WA |
| 20640 | STRIKE 14-White | 1500 | 18-10 | 64% | 14 | AZ |
| 20641 | Exile 16-Black | 1500 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | IA |
| 20642 | Spirit 18 | 1500 | 2-1 | 50% | 18 | IA |
| 20643 | Ohio Valley Volleyball Company 16-Adidas g | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | OH |
| 20644 | PIRATAS ADN 17-2 | 1500 | 8-17 | 32% | 17 | PR |
| 20645 | 360 Volleyball Club 13-Ultra | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | TX |
| 20646 | Dest 13-W | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | |
| 20647 | ICV 13-Griffin fw | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | |
| 20648 | IA Juniors 13-Black | 1500 | 30-36 | 45% | 13 | IA |
| 20649 | 2Legit 16-Black | 1500 | 6-3 | 67% | 16 | FL |
| 20650 | VV U14 | 1500 | 29-23 | 56% | 14 | VA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.