2025-2026 Season — Page 412 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20551 | SC VB Project 14-Green | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | CA |
| 20552 | AES 2.0 Testing Club 14 2.0 testing (GL) (3) | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | IL |
| 20553 | Anthony 10 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | WI |
| 20554 | LOTOVC G14-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | MO |
| 20555 | UVA 14-National | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | LA |
| 20556 | DE.Ozark Juniors 12-2 blue | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | AR |
| 20557 | Hanai Volleyball Club 13-Black | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | AZ |
| 20558 | Mobile Storm 17-Ayana | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | AL |
| 20559 | ACE Test Team 14 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | MN |
| 20560 | Nebraska D-League Volleyball 17-Dan | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | IA |
| 20561 | Ashland Aces 11U | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 11 | KY |
| 20562 | MAVS 816 16-3 | 1500 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | KS |
| 20563 | Empire Jrs 10 | 1500 | 17-27 | 39% | 10 | CA |
| 20564 | CCVBC 15-Tanner | 1500 | 24-24 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 20565 | Junior Jays 16-Blue | 1500 | 5-4 | 50% | 16 | MN |
| 20566 | WSRVC 14-Patchen | 1500 | 4-6 | 40% | 14 | WY |
| 20567 | TNT 14-Journey (ashley) | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | PA |
| 20568 | OCTANE REBELS 15 | 1500 | 9-5 | 60% | 15 | NY |
| 20569 | HORIZON VBC G18-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | KY |
| 20570 | No Limits Volleyball 16-Crystal | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | FL |
| 20571 | SPORTIME 16-Usa | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | NY |
| 20572 | Peak Volleyball Academy 17-Smack | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | TX |
| 20573 | airell's courts Club olleyball 12-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | TX |
| 20574 | Roots Volleyball Academy 13-Blue | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | IA |
| 20575 | LOSO 13-2 amy/merrill | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | OH |
| 20576 | Club MVP 13-Rich | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | MO |
| 20577 | K Elites Volleyball Club 16-Red | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | MO |
| 20578 | Empire 13-Premier | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | CA |
| 20579 | SADDLEBACK 17-Makenzie | 1500 | 27-25 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 20580 | BVC 14-Courtney | 1500 | 14-15 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 20581 | Rancho 18-Select | 1500 | 26-24 | 52% | 18 | CA |
| 20582 | Valley Volleyball Academy 12-Tiffany | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | CA |
| 20583 | High Performance STL 10 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 10 | MO |
| 20584 | Austin Performance Volleyball 16-Moonlight | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | TX |
| 20585 | Wrecking Crew VBC 13-R1 charley | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | TX |
| 20586 | PCVC 18-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | OH |
| 20587 | Velocity 18-2 national | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | AR |
| 20588 | New Wave 18-Brown | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 18 | OH |
| 20589 | Manhattan Mayhem Volleyball Club 13-Grey | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | KS |
| 20590 | Goodhue Wildcats 12-Mb legends | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | MN |
| 20591 | Velocity 17-1 national | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 17 | AR |
| 20592 | Elevate 14-Pink spring | 1500 | 5-2 | 71% | 14 | IL |
| 20593 | BPR Volleyball Club 16-Summit | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | PR |
| 20594 | Potomac Storm Volleyball Club 16-6 christian | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 20595 | SynergyForce Volleyball Club 16-Caitie | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | CA |
| 20596 | PEVC 14-Amanda s | 1500 | 22-18 | 55% | 14 | AL |
| 20597 | Inferno 15 (BG) | 1500 | 7-5 | 58% | 15 | WI |
| 20598 | Potomac Storm Volleyball Club 16-3 izze u | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 20599 | Triumph Volleyball Academy 16-1 | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | CA |
| 20600 | Sports Performance 16-Diamond | 1500 | 0-0 | 0% | 16 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.