Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 385 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19201 MVP 12-1 1512 2-2 50% 12 OH
19202 Parkland Vipers Volleyball Club 14 1512 5-4 56% 14
19203 Southern Legacy 17 1512 24-20 55% 17 SC
19204 Fever 16 1512 9-9 50% 16 NV
19205 SVC NGV 15-Kylee 1512 16-16 50% 15 GA
19206 ROCK Club Volleyball 12 ROCK Club Volleyball 1512 7-6 54% 12 CO
19207 A-E Edge 16 1512 6-5 55% 16 MN
19208 Empower 16 Lannie 1512 16-18 47% 16 CA
19209 VA Surge 16 1512 9-5 64% 16 VA
19210 Team Atlantis 15-Robinette 1512 4-2 67% 15 OH
19211 797 Empire 12-S 1512 14-9 61% 12 TX
19212 Bremen 12-Walter 1512 3-3 50% 12 IN
19213 Sweet 16-S black 1512 9-6 60% 16 MI
19214 3DGE 15-1 black 1512 11-22 33% 15 PA
19215 United Volleyball 16 1512 8-10 44% 16 NY
19216 Zero Gravity 16-White 1512 2-2 50% 16 OH
19217 JAG VBC 13-5 1512 3-2 60% 13 WI
19218 ENVOL 13-3 1512 4-2 67% 13 PR
19219 Alpha Omega Volleyball G14-2 1512 9-6 47% 14 MO
19220 WI Shock 15-Pink 1512 18-13 58% 15 WI
19221 Border West 12 1512 4-3 44% 12 MN
19222 Mindset Premier 16-Black 1512 26-14 65% 16 IL
19223 Tstreet LV 17-Indy 1512 30-27 53% 17 CA
19224 Xtreme VBC 17-Adidas 1512 22-17 56% 17 WI
19225 Weimar Wranglers 12 1512 3-4 38% 12 TX
19226 KNVBC 15-Infinity 1512 4-3 57% 15 KS
19227 IMUA 17-Mizuno elite 1512 18-16 53% 17 MI
19228 HP Illinois 10-Green 1512 1-1 33% 10 MO
19229 JVBC 10-League 1512 2-2 50% 10 IA
19230 OCTANE FUSION 18 1512 4-15 21% 18 NY
19231 MiElite 11-National east 1512 12-9 57% 11 MI
19232 NE Power VB 14-Strike 1512 1-1 25% 14 NE
19233 Low Country 15-Kara 1512 2-6 25% 15 SC
19234 Arete 13-Prep steel 1512 4-2 50% 13 TX
19235 MN North 17-1 red 1512 38-42 48% 17 MN
19236 Actyve Volleyball 17-Adidas 1512 19-21 48% 17 CA
19237 JJVA 14-Black 1512 31-39 44% 14 FL
19238 Club South 16-1 1512 23-31 43% 16 TX
19239 St. Croix Select 12 SC Select Silver 1512 8-5 53% 12 WI
19240 Aitkin 16-1 1512 3-2 60% 16 MN
19241 DVA UA 13 Elite 1512 37-35 51% 13 IL
19242 Fresno Heat HEAT 13-National boo 1512 14-18 42% 13 CA
19243 Mets 14-Issalex 1512 6-5 55% 14 PR
19244 LIVEWIRE 14-Black 1512 28-26 52% 14 AZ
19245 H SS Storm 15-1 1512 6-4 55% 15 TX
19246 EEVC 16-1 1512 4-2 67% 16 CA
19247 Millbury Storm 14 1512 17-7 68% 14 MA
19248 CALI 14-Red 1512 14-17 45% 14 NY
19249 ADREN 15-3 1511 3-2 60% 15 OH
19250 Cap City 10-State white 1511 3-3 30% 10 MT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.