Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 386 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19251 NCWVBC 16-2 black 1511 9-12 43% 16 WA
19252 NPVA 12-1 1511 10-6 63% 12 OR
19253 ATHENA VB 13-1 gold national 1511 19-37 34% 13 OR
19254 CHiX 15-White 1511 12-8 60% 15 OH
19255 Apex VBTC 15-Summit red 1511 4-1 80% 15 OH
19256 Club Koa 13 Crest 1511 22-12 65% 13 CA
19257 865 Volleyball 17 17 BLUE 1511 3-2 60% 17 TN
19258 HVA 14-Blue 1511 9-10 47% 14 TX
19259 Max Performance 15-Lauren 1511 12-7 57% 15 MA
19260 Summit 16-Royal elite 1511 21-21 50% 16 IN
19261 BeSomeone Goats 11-White 1511 8-5 62% 11 TX
19262 Downstate 15-Vipers 1511 23-28 45% 15 NY
19263 MIDWEST ELITE 14 1511 2-1 50% 14 IA
19264 TC ELITE 12 BRE 1511 7-8 47% 12 LA
19265 GSA 12-Markaija 1511 4-8 33% 12 CA
19266 CTRUS 17-1 1511 17-8 68% 17 CA
19267 LIV 14-Black cole 1511 11-18 38% 14 CA
19268 Madtown 13-1 regional 1511 11-11 50% 13 WI
19269 AVBC 16-R - fanello 1511 8-7 53% 16 OH
19270 Utah Mojo 16-Elite 1511 11-16 32% 16 UT
19271 Toby Academy 16 1511 3-2 60% 16 FL
19272 Granada Hills 18-Royal 1511 4-3 57% 18 CA
19273 NE Elite 12-Prime 1511 18-17 51% 12 NE
19274 WACO VBC 17-Ua red 1511 14-22 37% 17 TX
19275 SIVA 13-White 1511 11-13 41% 13 ID
19276 VC United SP 11-Navy regional 1511 21-15 53% 11 IL
19277 Cut Shot VBC 15-1 1511 24-17 59% 15 CA
19278 Cajunland 12-R 1511 18-18 49% 12 LA
19279 Vortex Volleyball 15 15 Phil & Annie Regional 1511 16-10 62% 15 GA
19280 APV 12-Metro 1511 9-9 47% 12 TX
19281 Top Flight SC 15 Phoenix 1511 30-28 52% 15 SC
19282 ZVC 15-1 1511 3-5 38% 15 UT
19283 MEVC 15 National 1511 24-31 41% 15 MD
19284 Allons 17-Summer 1511 2-2 50% 17 LA
19285 SPC Volleyball 17-1 1511 9-8 53% 17 FL
19286 Clarksville Volleyball Club 13-Seacoast white 1511 3-2 60% 13 TN
19287 Iron VC 12-1 1511 13-7 59% 12 AL
19288 Galaxy 14 Leigh 1511 11-12 48% 14 NC
19289 Allegiant 16-East 1511 9-8 45% 16 TX
19290 Warren Sixpack 15-Local 1 1511 6-4 60% 15 NJ
19291 NWI Premier NWI 12-Black 1511 3-4 43% 12 IA
19292 Eagles Select 13 1511 6-4 55% 13 IA
19293 Top Gun 15-Black 1511 16-10 62% 15 MI
19294 Top Flight 13-Zeta sp 1511 4-2 67% 13 IL
19295 Temecula Viper 14-3 josh 1511 19-12 61% 14 CA
19296 Apex 13-National red 1511 3-4 43% 13 MO
19297 NorthShore 12-Richards 1511 5-6 45% 12 OH
19298 MOVSelect 14-White 1511 3-1 75% 14 OH
19299 Rocky Mountain Volleyball Club 12 Majestics (RM) 1511 4-3 40% 12
19300 Academy 14 Ruby 1511 27-20 57% 14 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.