2025-2026 Season — Page 384 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19151 | LRJ 15-Premier | 1512 | 28-26 | 52% | 15 | AR |
| 19152 | 360 15-National black | 1512 | 16-12 | 53% | 15 | NV |
| 19153 | Idaho ONE 16-Gray | 1512 | 29-30 | 49% | 16 | ID |
| 19154 | Electric City 17 | 1512 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | PA |
| 19155 | RRHEAT 15-2 auria | 1512 | 6-17 | 26% | 15 | UT |
| 19156 | SMASH 12-S energy | 1512 | 20-15 | 57% | 12 | MA |
| 19157 | UVA 11-C juniors | 1512 | 5-3 | 63% | 11 | CA |
| 19158 | PNW Premier 15-S | 1512 | 35-29 | 55% | 15 | WA |
| 19159 | NGT 16-1 | 1512 | 6-3 | 67% | 16 | GA |
| 19160 | SEV 16-2 | 1512 | 12-10 | 55% | 16 | MN |
| 19161 | CCV 16-1 | 1512 | 16-12 | 57% | 16 | MN |
| 19162 | Texas One 16-Cobalt | 1512 | 24-26 | 48% | 16 | TX |
| 19163 | PR Arsenal 12-Jetzel | 1512 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | PR |
| 19164 | SPVC 16-Melissa | 1512 | 8-6 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 19165 | Vaqueras 14-F manuel | 1512 | 4-5 | 44% | 14 | PR |
| 19166 | EOVBC 16-Black | 1512 | 10-8 | 56% | 16 | OR |
| 19167 | Marshall JO 13-Orange | 1512 | 11-12 | 46% | 13 | MN |
| 19168 | Sporting Albany Girls 18-Blue | 1512 | 24-23 | 51% | 18 | NY |
| 19169 | Spiketown VBC 11-3 | 1512 | 5-4 | 56% | 11 | OH |
| 19170 | MGA 15-Stars | 1512 | 17-15 | 53% | 15 | MA |
| 19171 | Blast 13-Dragons | 1512 | 16-12 | 57% | 13 | RI |
| 19172 | 314 VBC 18-Navy | 1512 | 26-16 | 55% | 18 | MO |
| 19173 | HHVBC 13-2 | 1512 | 1-1 | 25% | 13 | IA |
| 19174 | No Coast 17-Atlantic | 1512 | 18-21 | 46% | 17 | MO |
| 19175 | IEV 13-Blue | 1512 | 11-4 | 73% | 13 | FL |
| 19176 | Illini Elite 16-L maroon | 1512 | 19-13 | 59% | 16 | IL |
| 19177 | Mavericks 16-Elite | 1512 | 20-11 | 65% | 16 | MI |
| 19178 | NIVA 15 RUBY | 1512 | 24-19 | 56% | 15 | IN |
| 19179 | UNION 18-Purple | 1512 | 19-16 | 54% | 18 | IN |
| 19180 | Point Break VBC 16 Marisa | 1512 | 15-11 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 19181 | Attack VBC 14-Mizuno lime | 1512 | 25-24 | 51% | 14 | MI |
| 19182 | Diablo VBC 15-Brentwood | 1512 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | NV |
| 19183 | SIVA 18-White | 1512 | 2-4 | 33% | 18 | ID |
| 19184 | Knightro 12-Black | 1512 | 11-7 | 61% | 12 | MN |
| 19185 | Insanity Volleyball 14-2 | 1512 | 15-16 | 48% | 14 | TN |
| 19186 | Acers 16-Blue | 1512 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | WI |
| 19187 | oe 14-2 | 1512 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | OH |
| 19188 | NWAJS 15-National | 1512 | 3-1 | 60% | 15 | NE |
| 19189 | KNVBC 15-2 crossfire | 1512 | 7-5 | 58% | 15 | KS |
| 19190 | VC United 14-1 regional | 1512 | 9-8 | 50% | 14 | IL |
| 19191 | Blizzard 15 Blizzard (NO) | 1512 | 6-7 | 40% | 15 | |
| 19192 | Weimar Wranglers 12 | 1512 | 3-4 | 38% | 12 | TX |
| 19193 | VIP 17-Elite | 1512 | 7-16 | 24% | 17 | |
| 19194 | MVP 12-1 | 1512 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | OH |
| 19195 | Iowa Impact 13-1 premier | 1512 | 16-12 | 53% | 13 | IA |
| 19196 | CEVC 18 Travel | 1512 | 20-15 | 54% | 18 | NY |
| 19197 | Pipestone Area 12 | 1512 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 19198 | Mount Vernon 13 | 1512 | 2-1 | 50% | 13 | IA |
| 19199 | KVA Pack 15-Ug black | 1512 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | |
| 19200 | Sunset West 14-Wave | 1512 | 2-1 | 50% | 14 | NE |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.