Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 384 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19151 LRJ 15-Premier 1512 28-26 52% 15 AR
19152 360 15-National black 1512 16-12 53% 15 NV
19153 Idaho ONE 16-Gray 1512 29-30 49% 16 ID
19154 Electric City 17 1512 5-5 50% 17 PA
19155 RRHEAT 15-2 auria 1512 6-17 26% 15 UT
19156 SMASH 12-S energy 1512 20-15 57% 12 MA
19157 UVA 11-C juniors 1512 5-3 63% 11 CA
19158 PNW Premier 15-S 1512 35-29 55% 15 WA
19159 NGT 16-1 1512 6-3 67% 16 GA
19160 SEV 16-2 1512 12-10 55% 16 MN
19161 CCV 16-1 1512 16-12 57% 16 MN
19162 Texas One 16-Cobalt 1512 24-26 48% 16 TX
19163 PR Arsenal 12-Jetzel 1512 3-2 60% 12 PR
19164 SPVC 16-Melissa 1512 8-6 57% 16 CA
19165 Vaqueras 14-F manuel 1512 4-5 44% 14 PR
19166 EOVBC 16-Black 1512 10-8 56% 16 OR
19167 Marshall JO 13-Orange 1512 11-12 46% 13 MN
19168 Sporting Albany Girls 18-Blue 1512 24-23 51% 18 NY
19169 Spiketown VBC 11-3 1512 5-4 56% 11 OH
19170 MGA 15-Stars 1512 17-15 53% 15 MA
19171 Blast 13-Dragons 1512 16-12 57% 13 RI
19172 314 VBC 18-Navy 1512 26-16 55% 18 MO
19173 HHVBC 13-2 1512 1-1 25% 13 IA
19174 No Coast 17-Atlantic 1512 18-21 46% 17 MO
19175 IEV 13-Blue 1512 11-4 73% 13 FL
19176 Illini Elite 16-L maroon 1512 19-13 59% 16 IL
19177 Mavericks 16-Elite 1512 20-11 65% 16 MI
19178 NIVA 15 RUBY 1512 24-19 56% 15 IN
19179 UNION 18-Purple 1512 19-16 54% 18 IN
19180 Point Break VBC 16 Marisa 1512 15-11 58% 16 CA
19181 Attack VBC 14-Mizuno lime 1512 25-24 51% 14 MI
19182 Diablo VBC 15-Brentwood 1512 4-4 50% 15 NV
19183 SIVA 18-White 1512 2-4 33% 18 ID
19184 Knightro 12-Black 1512 11-7 61% 12 MN
19185 Insanity Volleyball 14-2 1512 15-16 48% 14 TN
19186 Acers 16-Blue 1512 9-6 60% 16 WI
19187 oe 14-2 1512 3-1 75% 14 OH
19188 NWAJS 15-National 1512 3-1 60% 15 NE
19189 KNVBC 15-2 crossfire 1512 7-5 58% 15 KS
19190 VC United 14-1 regional 1512 9-8 50% 14 IL
19191 Blizzard 15 Blizzard (NO) 1512 6-7 40% 15
19192 Weimar Wranglers 12 1512 3-4 38% 12 TX
19193 VIP 17-Elite 1512 7-16 24% 17
19194 MVP 12-1 1512 2-2 50% 12 OH
19195 Iowa Impact 13-1 premier 1512 16-12 53% 13 IA
19196 CEVC 18 Travel 1512 20-15 54% 18 NY
19197 Pipestone Area 12 1512 2-2 50% 12 MN
19198 Mount Vernon 13 1512 2-1 50% 13 IA
19199 KVA Pack 15-Ug black 1512 4-3 57% 15
19200 Sunset West 14-Wave 1512 2-1 50% 14 NE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.