Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 383 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19101 House of Sports 14-Blue 1513 14-8 64% 14 NY
19102 Aim High 16 Aim High Danielle (MI) 1513 23-14 62% 16
19103 SC Midlands Volleyball 12 SC Midlands KP Black (PM) (2) 1513 3-2 60% 12 SC
19104 CALI 16-Red 1513 24-25 49% 16 NY
19105 United 15-Blue 1513 13-18 42% 15 AL
19106 Harmoni 13-1 1513 14-13 52% 13 CA
19107 WGVC 17-1 elite purple 1513 8-3 73% 17 FL
19108 Seal Beach 12-Blue 1513 20-20 50% 12 CA
19109 Xcel VB 12-1 adidas 1513 9-10 45% 12 TX
19110 Vortex 16-Lexy 1513 1-1 25% 16 GA
19111 AVBC 16-A moody/roggow 1513 16-11 59% 16 OH
19112 Circle City 11-Black 1513 25-22 53% 11 IN
19113 MVA 14-Regionals 1513 21-12 53% 14 MT
19114 CWAVE Savron-Buit 10 1513 3-2 60% 10 OH
19115 Elevate Ak Volleyball Club 18 13 Claire (AK) 1513 3-2 60% 18 AK
19116 Angels 11-Shannon 1513 15-15 50% 11 NM
19117 purple storm 14-2 1513 0-0 0% 14 TN
19118 SVC 18-1 (NE) 1513 33-29 53% 18 NY
19119 PAO STL 18-Rda black 1513 29-20 58% 18 MO
19120 Fusion 13-1 (BG) 1513 2-2 50% 13 WI
19121 Black Hills Juniors 13-Black 1513 7-4 58% 13 WY
19122 EVA 15-Black 1513 30-20 60% 15 IL
19123 TEVO 12 TEVO-6A 1513 2-2 50% 12
19124 Slainte 12-Forest 1513 17-15 53% 12 CA
19125 VVA 13-Shaver 1513 22-25 47% 13 CA
19126 SEIVB 13-Midwest muscle 1513 7-6 54% 13 IN
19127 SCVC 14-Peight 1513 11-7 61% 14 OH
19128 Premier 14-Red v 1513 16-13 50% 14 TX
19129 Prime 15-Adidas g 1513 26-28 48% 15 CA
19130 HOU STELLAR 18-Premier 1513 20-22 48% 18 TX
19131 Rage 18-Wilson 1513 3-5 38% 18 CA
19132 LAVA 18-1 1513 19-15 56% 18 OH
19133 H2 14-2 longhorns_larry & brandon 1513 15-15 50% 14 MO
19134 NIVBC 16-Desi 1512 12-9 57% 16 WA
19135 MSVB 14-R bailee/dorsey 1512 6-8 38% 14 AK
19136 NWAJS 15-Elite 1512 2-5 29% 15 AR
19137 Zoom Volleyball Club 15-1 1512 4-2 57% 15 KS
19138 E3VB 14-Excel 1512 17-20 46% 14 NM
19139 ZTV 12-2 platinum 1512 7-7 44% 12 MT
19140 TC ELITE 15-Demarcion 1512 8-3 73% 15 LA
19141 Dallas Skyline Juniors 16-Silver 1512 4-3 57% 16 TX
19142 Lansing Volleyball Club 17-1 1512 4-2 67% 17 NY
19143 Ridgeline 16-2 1512 13-12 45% 16 MT
19144 TuoCo 14-S 1512 2-3 40% 14 CA
19145 Mill City 14-Orange 1512 20-17 54% 14 MA
19146 RockCity 15 A2 1512 7-9 44% 15 OH
19147 Kidron VBC Lewis-Vizzo 13 1512 10-5 67% 13 OH
19148 A2 15 Shamrock 1512 34-25 58% 15 OH
19149 Avalanche Volleyball Club 14 Avalanche Brittney (LK) 1512 14-10 58% 14 MI
19150 Tehachapi 14-Kelsey 1512 2-5 29% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.