2025-2026 Season — Page 383 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19101 | House of Sports 14-Blue | 1513 | 14-8 | 64% | 14 | NY |
| 19102 | Aim High 16 Aim High Danielle (MI) | 1513 | 23-14 | 62% | 16 | |
| 19103 | SC Midlands Volleyball 12 SC Midlands KP Black (PM) (2) | 1513 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | SC |
| 19104 | CALI 16-Red | 1513 | 24-25 | 49% | 16 | NY |
| 19105 | United 15-Blue | 1513 | 13-18 | 42% | 15 | AL |
| 19106 | Harmoni 13-1 | 1513 | 14-13 | 52% | 13 | CA |
| 19107 | WGVC 17-1 elite purple | 1513 | 8-3 | 73% | 17 | FL |
| 19108 | Seal Beach 12-Blue | 1513 | 20-20 | 50% | 12 | CA |
| 19109 | Xcel VB 12-1 adidas | 1513 | 9-10 | 45% | 12 | TX |
| 19110 | Vortex 16-Lexy | 1513 | 1-1 | 25% | 16 | GA |
| 19111 | AVBC 16-A moody/roggow | 1513 | 16-11 | 59% | 16 | OH |
| 19112 | Circle City 11-Black | 1513 | 25-22 | 53% | 11 | IN |
| 19113 | MVA 14-Regionals | 1513 | 21-12 | 53% | 14 | MT |
| 19114 | CWAVE Savron-Buit 10 | 1513 | 3-2 | 60% | 10 | OH |
| 19115 | Elevate Ak Volleyball Club 18 13 Claire (AK) | 1513 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | AK |
| 19116 | Angels 11-Shannon | 1513 | 15-15 | 50% | 11 | NM |
| 19117 | purple storm 14-2 | 1513 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | TN |
| 19118 | SVC 18-1 (NE) | 1513 | 33-29 | 53% | 18 | NY |
| 19119 | PAO STL 18-Rda black | 1513 | 29-20 | 58% | 18 | MO |
| 19120 | Fusion 13-1 (BG) | 1513 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | WI |
| 19121 | Black Hills Juniors 13-Black | 1513 | 7-4 | 58% | 13 | WY |
| 19122 | EVA 15-Black | 1513 | 30-20 | 60% | 15 | IL |
| 19123 | TEVO 12 TEVO-6A | 1513 | 2-2 | 50% | 12 | |
| 19124 | Slainte 12-Forest | 1513 | 17-15 | 53% | 12 | CA |
| 19125 | VVA 13-Shaver | 1513 | 22-25 | 47% | 13 | CA |
| 19126 | SEIVB 13-Midwest muscle | 1513 | 7-6 | 54% | 13 | IN |
| 19127 | SCVC 14-Peight | 1513 | 11-7 | 61% | 14 | OH |
| 19128 | Premier 14-Red v | 1513 | 16-13 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 19129 | Prime 15-Adidas g | 1513 | 26-28 | 48% | 15 | CA |
| 19130 | HOU STELLAR 18-Premier | 1513 | 20-22 | 48% | 18 | TX |
| 19131 | Rage 18-Wilson | 1513 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | CA |
| 19132 | LAVA 18-1 | 1513 | 19-15 | 56% | 18 | OH |
| 19133 | H2 14-2 longhorns_larry & brandon | 1513 | 15-15 | 50% | 14 | MO |
| 19134 | NIVBC 16-Desi | 1512 | 12-9 | 57% | 16 | WA |
| 19135 | MSVB 14-R bailee/dorsey | 1512 | 6-8 | 38% | 14 | AK |
| 19136 | NWAJS 15-Elite | 1512 | 2-5 | 29% | 15 | AR |
| 19137 | Zoom Volleyball Club 15-1 | 1512 | 4-2 | 57% | 15 | KS |
| 19138 | E3VB 14-Excel | 1512 | 17-20 | 46% | 14 | NM |
| 19139 | ZTV 12-2 platinum | 1512 | 7-7 | 44% | 12 | MT |
| 19140 | TC ELITE 15-Demarcion | 1512 | 8-3 | 73% | 15 | LA |
| 19141 | Dallas Skyline Juniors 16-Silver | 1512 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | TX |
| 19142 | Lansing Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1512 | 4-2 | 67% | 17 | NY |
| 19143 | Ridgeline 16-2 | 1512 | 13-12 | 45% | 16 | MT |
| 19144 | TuoCo 14-S | 1512 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | CA |
| 19145 | Mill City 14-Orange | 1512 | 20-17 | 54% | 14 | MA |
| 19146 | RockCity 15 A2 | 1512 | 7-9 | 44% | 15 | OH |
| 19147 | Kidron VBC Lewis-Vizzo 13 | 1512 | 10-5 | 67% | 13 | OH |
| 19148 | A2 15 Shamrock | 1512 | 34-25 | 58% | 15 | OH |
| 19149 | Avalanche Volleyball Club 14 Avalanche Brittney (LK) | 1512 | 14-10 | 58% | 14 | MI |
| 19150 | Tehachapi 14-Kelsey | 1512 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.